Tararone Investments v DBS Bank: Scope of Charge over Fixed Deposit for Banking Facilities

In Tararone Investments Pte Ltd v DBS Bank, the Court of Appeal of Singapore, on 2001-09-04, addressed the scope of a charge over a fixed deposit account. Tararone Investments had provided a fixed deposit to DBS as security for banking facilities granted to Sogo Department Stores. When Sogo faced financial difficulties, DBS terminated the overdraft facility but continued to honor certain cheques. The court considered whether the charge secured only the initial overdraft or all monies owed by Sogo to DBS. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, declaring that the charge secured all facilities extended by DBS to Sogo, not just the initial overdraft.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Court of Appeal

1.2 Outcome

Appeal allowed.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The Court of Appeal determined the scope of a charge over a fixed deposit account securing banking facilities, ruling it covered all monies owed, not just the initial overdraft.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Tararone Investments Pte LtdRespondentCorporationAppeal LostLost
DBSAppellantCorporationAppeal AllowedWonLeslie Chew, Chan Kia Pheng
Sogo Department Stores (S) Pte LtdOtherCorporation

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Chao Hick TinJustice of AppealNo
L P TheanJustice of AppealNo
Yong Pung HowChief JusticeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Leslie ChewKhattar Wong & Partners
Chan Kia PhengKhattar Wong & Partners
Ronald ChooRajah & Tann
Chio Yuen-LynRajah & Tann

4. Facts

  1. Sogo was indebted to DBS for $18m in an overdraft account.
  2. DBS agreed to continue the overdraft facility subject to a repayment schedule and security.
  3. Tararone executed a charge over a $18m fixed deposit to secure Sogo's facilities.
  4. DBS terminated the overdraft facility due to Sogo's financial difficulties.
  5. DBS continued to honor certain cheques drawn by Sogo after termination.
  6. Sogo and Tararone were placed under interim judicial management.
  7. DBS sought to enforce the charge on the fixed deposit to satisfy Sogo's debt.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Tararone Investments Pte Ltd, CA 600022/2001, [2001] SGCA 57

6. Timeline

DateEvent
DBS informed Sogo of overdraft facility terms.
Tararone executed charge in respect of fixed deposit.
DBS notified Sogo of overdraft facility termination.
DBS notified Tararone of overdraft facility termination.
Sogo protested DBS's decision to terminate overdraft facility.
DBS stated they would honor specific cheques on a without prejudice basis.
Sogo and Tararone placed under interim judicial management.
Interim judicial managers instructed DBS to close Sogo's accounts.
Sum deducted from overdraft facility for payment on letter of guarantee.
Judicial management order made against Tararone.
Sum owing by Sogo in overdraft account was $2,878,586.28.
DBS sought consent to enforce charge on fixed deposit.
Interim judicial managers explained they had to consider questions before replying.
Originating summons filed.
Decision Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Scope of Charge
    • Outcome: The court held that the charge was an 'all money' charge, securing all facilities extended by DBS to Sogo, not just the initial overdraft.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Interpretation of 'all monies' clause
      • Effect of termination of overdraft facility on charge
    • Related Cases:
      • [1983] 2 Lloyd`s Rep 298
      • [1986] 2 BCC 98
  2. Estoppel
    • Outcome: The court held that the elements of estoppel were not satisfied, as there was no clear and unambiguous representation, no reliance, and no detriment suffered.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Representation by conduct
      • Reliance on representation
      • Detriment suffered
  3. Duty to Disclose
    • Outcome: The court held that there was no duty to disclose the revival of the overdraft account, as it was not an unusual feature.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Unusual features of transaction
      • Disclosure to surety
    • Related Cases:
      • [1999] 3 SLR 650

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Declaration
  2. Recovery of Debt

9. Cause of Actions

  • Enforcement of Charge
  • Breach of Contract (Overdraft Facility)

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Banking Litigation

11. Industries

  • Banking

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Bank of India v Trans Continental Commodity MerchantsEnglish Court of AppealYes[1983] 2 Lloyd`s Rep 298EnglandCited for the purposive and practical approach taken by the court in relation to a wide `all money` clause in a guarantee given to a bank.
Re Rudd & SonEnglish Court of AppealYes[1986] 2 BCC 98EnglandCited to gauge judicial attitudes in relation to such `all money` clauses and to interpret such clauses in accordance with its commercial sense, in order to give effect to the parties` intention.
Estoril Investments v Westpac Banking CorpN/AYes[1993] 6 BPR 13AustraliaCited by counsel for Tararone to contend that the present charge should sensibly be read down to circumscribe its application, but the court disagreed.
Habibullah Mohamed Yousuff v Indian BankCourt of AppealYes[1999] 3 SLR 650SingaporeCited by Tararone on the basis that a bank must disclose to a surety `unusual features` relating to a transaction, but the court distinguished it.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Companies Act (Cap 50, 1994 Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Charge
  • Fixed Deposit
  • Overdraft Facility
  • Banking Facilities
  • All Money Charge
  • Continuing Security
  • Termination
  • Estoppel
  • Judicial Management

15.2 Keywords

  • charge
  • fixed deposit
  • overdraft
  • banking facilities
  • security
  • DBS
  • Tararone
  • Sogo
  • Singapore
  • contract law
  • banking law

16. Subjects

  • Banking
  • Finance
  • Security
  • Contract Law

17. Areas of Law

  • Banking Law
  • Contract Law
  • Lending and Security
  • Construction Law