Han Teck Soo v Teo Ooi Leng: Appeal Against Ancillary Orders in Divorce Case

In the High Court of Singapore, Judicial Commissioner Choo Han Teck heard an appeal by Han Teck Soo against ancillary orders made on 8 February 2001, in a divorce case with Teo Ooi Leng, Irene. The primary issues concerned the division of matrimonial assets, specifically a flat purchased jointly, and custody arrangements for their three children. The court dismissed the appeal, varying the orders only to fix the tuition fees for the eldest child at $100.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal dismissed with a minor variation to the tuition fee order.

1.3 Case Type

Family

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal by husband against ancillary orders in divorce case. The court varied the orders to fix tuition fees for the eldest child.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Han Teck SooAppellant, RespondentIndividualAppeal dismissed with a minor variation to the tuition fee order.Lost
Teo Ooi Leng, IreneRespondent, PetitionerIndividualOrders of 8 February 2001 were varied to fix the tuition fees for the eldest child at $100.Won

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The respondent and petitioner married on 17 August 1985.
  2. They have three children, aged 11, 6, and 3.
  3. The eldest child is dyslexic and requires special attention.
  4. The petitioner earns a net salary of $2,242 a month.
  5. The respondent earns about $1,839 a month and has a car allowance of $800.
  6. The parties purchased two flats prior to the one they bought on 1 January 1998 in joint names.
  7. The petitioner contributed 19% of the purchase price of the flat, and the respondent contributed 81%.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Han Teck Soo v Teo Ooi Leng, Irene, D 3535/1999, RAS 720008/2001, [2001] SGHC 152

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Parties married
Parties bought a flat in joint names
Judge made ancillary orders
Appeal decision date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Division of Matrimonial Assets
    • Outcome: The court ordered that the flat be transferred to the petitioner upon her reimbursing the respondent's CPF.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Child Custody
    • Outcome: The court granted sole custody of the children to the petitioner, with the direction that she consults the respondent in respect of religion and formal education concerning the children.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Child Maintenance
    • Outcome: The court fixed the tuition fees for the eldest child at $100.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Share in the proceeds of the flat
  2. Joint custody of the children
  3. Disturbance of the maintenance order

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Child Custody
  • Division of Matrimonial Assets

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Ancillary orders
  • Matrimonial assets
  • Child custody
  • Maintenance order
  • Dyslexic child
  • CPF reimbursement

15.2 Keywords

  • divorce
  • ancillary orders
  • child custody
  • matrimonial assets
  • Singapore
  • family law

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Child Custody
  • Matrimonial Assets