Wong Jin Fah v L&M Prestressing Pte Ltd: Construction Dispute over Defective Materials
In Wong Jin Fah v L&M Prestressing Pte Ltd, the High Court of Singapore delivered a judgment on August 31, 2001, regarding a construction dispute. The court's decision favored Wong Jin Fah.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Judgment for Plaintiff
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Wong Jin Fah v L&M Prestressing Pte Ltd concerns a construction dispute regarding defective materials. The High Court rendered its decision on August 31, 2001.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wong Jin Fah | Plaintiff | Individual | Judgment for Plaintiff | Won | |
L&M Prestressing Pte Ltd | Defendant | Corporation | Judgment against Defendant | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Lai Siu Chiu | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|
4. Facts
5. Formal Citations
- Wong Jin Fah v L&M Prestressing Pte Ltd, Suit No 474 of 2000/L, [2001] SGHC 250
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Suit filed (Suit No 474 of 2000/L) | |
Judgment delivered |
7. Legal Issues
8. Remedies Sought
- No remedies sought
9. Cause of Actions
- No cause of actions
10. Practice Areas
- Construction Dispute
11. Industries
- Construction
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No cited cases |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Construction Dispute
- Defective Materials
15.2 Keywords
- Construction
- Dispute
- Defective Materials
- Singapore
- High Court
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Civil Litigation | 60 |
16. Subjects
- Construction Dispute
- Defective Materials