Foo Tee Sey v Loy Hui Eng: Division of Matrimonial Assets After 18-Year Marriage

In Foo Tee Sey v Loy Hui Eng, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal regarding the division of matrimonial assets following an 18-year marriage. The Family Court had ordered a 60-40 division in favor of the wife, Loy Hui Eng, citing her non-pecuniary contributions. The husband, Foo Tee Sey, appealed, arguing unequal financial contributions and an agreement to keep finances separate. Choo Han Teck JC dismissed the appeal, upholding the original apportionment, emphasizing the wife's significant non-financial contributions and the lack of evidence for a formal agreement regarding asset division in contemplation of divorce.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Family

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Division of matrimonial assets after an 18-year marriage. The High Court upheld the Family Court's decision to divide the assets 60-40 in the wife's favor.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Foo Tee SeyAppellant, PetitionerIndividualAppeal dismissedLost
Loy Hui EngRespondentIndividualAssets division of 60%Won

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The petitioner and respondent were married on 18 September 1982 and separated in June 1996.
  2. The respondent was granted custody of their two sons.
  3. The matrimonial home was purchased in 1985 for $540,000.
  4. The judge found that the respondent was entitled to more because of her non-pecuniary contributions although the direct contributions were about equal.
  5. The parties had an agreement to keep their respective finances separate and apart.
  6. The judge accepted the respondent's claim that a sum of $5,406 was paid by her towards the maintenance and upkeep of the house from 1997 to 2000.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Foo Tee Sey v Loy Hui Eng, Div P 143/2000, [2001] SGHC 276

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Parties married
Matrimonial home purchased
Loan granted by employers
Sum credited into account
Parties separated
Wife paid for maintenance and upkeep of the house
Parties divorced
Respondent's affidavit
Valuation of CLOB shares
Decision date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Division of Matrimonial Assets
    • Outcome: The court upheld the division of matrimonial assets with 60% to the respondent and 40% to the petitioner.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Direct contribution towards purchase of matrimonial home
      • Indirect contribution towards purchase of matrimonial home
      • Non-pecuniary contributions
      • Agreement to maintain income in separate bank accounts
  2. Duty to Maintain Matrimonial Home
    • Outcome: The court held that both parties were under a shared duty to maintain the matrimonial home until its division has been adjudicated upon.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. No remedies sought

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Divorce
  • Family Law
  • Asset Division

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Wong Kam Fong Anne v Ang Ann LiangN/AYes[1993] 2 SLR 192SingaporeCited regarding agreements made in contemplation of divorce and the division of matrimonial assets.
Hyman v HymanN/AYes[1929] AC 601N/ACited in relation to agreements regarding the division of matrimonial assets.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Women's Charter (Cap 353, 1997 Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Matrimonial assets
  • Direct contribution
  • Indirect contribution
  • Non-pecuniary contribution
  • Division of assets
  • Separate accounts
  • Maintenance of matrimonial home

15.2 Keywords

  • matrimonial assets
  • division of assets
  • family law
  • divorce
  • singapore
  • high court

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Matrimonial Assets