Sinnadurai Thirumoorthy v Goh Seck Kang: Dispute over Personal Loans for Company Debt

In the case of Sinnadurai Thirumoorthy v Goh Seck Kang, heard in the High Court of Singapore on 2002-10-02, the plaintiff, Sinnadurai Thirumoorthy, claimed that the defendant, Goh Seck Kang, owed him money from several personal loans. The defendant denied the debt, arguing that the sums were either company expenses or had been repaid through the transfer of shares. The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim, finding the defendant's testimony more credible and consistent with the evidence presented.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs to the defendant.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

A dispute arose between Sinnadurai Thirumoorthy and Goh Seck Kang over alleged personal loans. The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim, finding the defendant's testimony more credible.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Sinnadurai ThirumoorthyPlaintiffIndividualClaim DismissedLostSiaw Kheng Boon
Goh Seck KangDefendantIndividualJudgment for DefendantWonGoh Seck Kang

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Lai Siu ChiuJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Siaw Kheng BoonSiaw Kheng Boon & Co
Goh Seck KangIn Person

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiff claimed the defendant borrowed money to pay Mega's debt to Heisei.
  2. Defendant denied requesting loans from the plaintiff.
  3. Defendant claimed the plaintiff paid Heisei on behalf of Mega.
  4. Defendant transferred 400,000 shares in Mega to the plaintiff.
  5. Plaintiff purchased shares in Mega from other shareholders.
  6. Plaintiff made payments to the defendant for shares purchased.
  7. The court found the defendant's testimony more credible.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Sinnadurai Thirumoorthy v Goh Seck Kang, Suit 681/2001/S, [2002] SGHC 230

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Mega Consortium Pte Ltd incorporated in Singapore.
Mega obtained approval for a joint-venture in Beijing.
Mega assigned the contract with the municipal government to Mitten International Pte Ltd.
Mega signed a Financial Services Agreement with Fidelity.
Plaintiff purchased shares in Mega and became a director.
Mega signed a Convertible Loan Stock Agreement with Heisei.
Plaintiff and defendant resigned as directors of Mega.
Mega held an Extraordinary General Meeting.
First interest installment due to Heisei.
Heisei brought an action against Mega, the defendant and Simon Lim.
Plaintiff re-appointed Mega's managing director.
Mega and Heisei entered into a Settlement Agreement.
Heisei discontinued the Suit after receiving the first interest payment.
Plaintiff indicated he could finance the project on better terms than Chang Cheng.
Resolution passed to revoke the offer of shareholding to Chang Cheng.
T M Hoon & Co demanded payment of $315,000.
Plaintiff issued a cheque for $315,000 to Heisei.
Judgment issued.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Contract
    • Outcome: The court found that the defendant did not breach any contract with the plaintiff.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Debt Claim
    • Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for the alleged debt.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract
  • Debt

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Personal Loan
  • Mega Consortium Pte Ltd
  • Heisei Kami Express (S) Pte Ltd
  • Convertible Loan Stock Agreement
  • Mitten International Pte Ltd
  • Share Transfer
  • Payment Voucher

15.2 Keywords

  • loan
  • shares
  • debt
  • payment
  • agreement

16. Subjects

  • Contract Dispute
  • Loan Agreement
  • Shareholder Dispute

17. Areas of Law

  • Contract Law
  • Civil Procedure