Lion City Holdings: Asad Jumabhoy's Examination under Companies Act
In the High Court of Singapore, Tay Yong Kwang J dismissed Asad Jumabhoy's application to set aside an order for examination sought by the liquidators of Lion City Holdings Pte Ltd, Mick Aw Cheok Huat and Christopher Bruce Johnson. The liquidators sought the examination under section 285 of the Companies Act to investigate the company's affairs. Jumabhoy argued he had already provided sufficient information and that the examination was a fishing expedition to support a breach of fiduciary duty claim. The court found the examination justified, considering the liquidators' duty to fully investigate the company's affairs and the existence of rival factions within the board of directors.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Application dismissed.
1.3 Case Type
Insolvency
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Former director Asad Jumabhoy sought to discharge an order for examination by liquidators. The court dismissed the application, finding the examination justified.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Asad Jumabhoy | Applicant | Individual | Application dismissed | Lost | |
Mick Aw Cheok Huat | Respondent | Individual | Order for examination upheld | Won | Paul Ng of Independent Practitioner Lionel Tay of Independent Practitioner |
Christopher Bruce Johnson | Respondent | Individual | Order for examination upheld | Won | Paul Ng of Independent Practitioner Lionel Tay of Independent Practitioner |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Tay Yong Kwang | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Loh Wai Mooi | Bih Li & Lee |
Rowena Chew | Bih Li & Lee |
Paul Ng | Independent Practitioner |
Lionel Tay | Independent Practitioner |
4. Facts
- Asad Jumabhoy is the former managing director of Lion City Holdings Pte Ltd.
- Lion City Holdings Pte Ltd was ordered to be wound up on 24 March 2000.
- The liquidators applied for an order to examine Asad Jumabhoy on issues concerning the company's affairs.
- The liquidators commenced Suit No. 450 of 2002 against Asad, his father and his brother for breach of fiduciary duty.
- Asad argued that he had already co-operated with the liquidators and answered their queries.
- The liquidators argued that there were still numerous areas regarding the company’s affairs in which they needed clarification from Asad.
- The liquidators were concerned about two transactions in 1996 in which Asad purchased the company’s shares in two other entities at what appeared to be a significant undervalue.
5. Formal Citations
- Re Lion City Holdings Pte Ltd, CWU 14/2000, SIC 601594/2002, [2003] SGHC 43
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Lion City Holdings Pte Ltd ordered to be wound up | |
Liquidators applied for order to examine Asad Jumabhoy | |
Hearing adjourned | |
Liquidators commenced Suit No. 450 of 2002 against Asad Jumabhoy, his father and his brother | |
Rajendran J granted order for examination | |
Liquidators appointed present solicitors | |
Examination adjourned after Asad's solicitors informed the District Judge that they might be taking out an application to vary the order made by Rajendran J | |
Asad's solicitors took out application seeking to set aside, discharge, vary or modify the order of 23 April 2002 | |
Validity of the writ of summons in Suit No. 450 of 2002 has been extended to 17 April 2003 | |
Application dismissed |
7. Legal Issues
- Whether order for examination should be discharged
- Outcome: The court held that the order for examination should not be discharged.
- Category: Procedural
- Sub-Issues:
- Full disclosure
- Delay in application
- Court's discretionary power to order examination
- Outcome: The court affirmed its discretionary power to order examination.
- Category: Procedural
- Liquidator's entitlement to information
- Outcome: The court held that the liquidators are entitled to information to enable them to give a fuller picture to the creditors and to the Court.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Order to set aside, discharge, vary or modify the order of 23 April 2002
- Costs of the application
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of fiduciary duty
10. Practice Areas
- Insolvency
- Liquidation
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Re Sasea Finance Ltd (in liquidation) | Unspecified | Yes | [1998] 1 BCLC 559 | England and Wales | Cited regarding the court's view on liquidators issuing a protective writ and then applying for examination to obtain information to plead a case. |
Re Atlantic Computers plc | Unspecified | Yes | [1998] BCC 200 | England and Wales | Cited for the principle that section 285 should not be used to confer special advantages on a party in ordinary litigation simply because he happened to be a liquidator. |
Peter Chi Man Kwong & Anor v Ronald Lee Kum Seng | Court of Appeal | Yes | [1984-1985] SLR 227 | Singapore | Cited as an example where the Court of Appeal allowed an order for examination to stand. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Companies Act (Cap 50, 1994 Rev Ed) s 285 | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Winding up
- Liquidator
- Examination
- Companies Act
- Breach of fiduciary duty
- Protective writ
- Statement of Affairs
15.2 Keywords
- Insolvency
- Winding up
- Examination
- Liquidator
- Companies Act
- Singapore
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Insolvency Law | 90 |
Winding Up | 90 |
Company Law | 50 |
Fiduciary Duties | 30 |
16. Subjects
- Insolvency Law
- Company Law
- Civil Procedure