Teng Cheng Sin v Law Fay Yuen: Appeal Against Personal Protection Order

In Teng Cheng Sin v Law Fay Yuen, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal by Teng Cheng Sin against a personal protection order granted to his wife, Law Fay Yuen, by the Family Court. The order stemmed from an incident on 2 January 2002, where Law Fay Yuen alleged that Teng Cheng Sin assaulted her. Kan Ting Chiu J dismissed the appeal, finding that the likelihood of repeated family violence justified the order.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Family

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal against a personal protection order. The High Court dismissed the appeal, finding a likelihood of repeated family violence.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Teng Cheng SinAppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLost
Law Fay Yuen (m.w.)RespondentIndividualPersonal Protection Order UpheldWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Kan Ting ChiuJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The parties were married in 1990 and have three children.
  2. The wife left the matrimonial home on 6 December 2001.
  3. The wife returned to the house on 2 January 2002 to pick up items for her sons.
  4. The wife alleged the husband assaulted her on 2 January 2002.
  5. The wife called the police after the alleged assault.
  6. The wife sought medical attention and obtained medical reports.
  7. The husband denied assaulting the wife.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Teng Cheng Sin v Law Fay Yuen (m.w.), DA 38/2002/W, [2003] SGHC 76

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Parties married
Law Fay Yuen left the matrimonial home
Incident at matrimonial home; Law Fay Yuen alleges assault
Law Fay Yuen made a police report
Law Fay Yuen examined at National University Hospital
Another incident between parties
Appeal dismissed

7. Legal Issues

  1. Family Violence
    • Outcome: The court found that family violence was likely to be committed and upheld the personal protection order.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Fair Trial
    • Outcome: The court acknowledged an error in admitting evidence of a later incident but found that it did not affect the essential validity of the order.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Personal Protection Order

9. Cause of Actions

  • Family Violence

10. Practice Areas

  • Family Violence
  • Appeals

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Women’s Charter (Cap 353, 1997 Rev Ed) s 65Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Personal Protection Order
  • Family Violence
  • Matrimonial Home
  • Assault
  • Medical Reports

15.2 Keywords

  • family law
  • personal protection order
  • family violence
  • domestic dispute
  • singapore

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Family Law
  • Family Violence
  • Civil Procedure