Altvater Jakob v Toh Eng Peng: Discovery Compliance & Competition Covenant

In Altvater Jakob Pte Ltd v Toh Eng Peng, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal against a decision by the Assistant Registrar to enter judgment for the plaintiff, Altvater Jakob Pte Ltd, against the seventh and eighth defendants for failing to comply with an 'unless order' regarding discovery of documents. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants were acting in competition with them, breaching a sale of business agreement and employment contracts. Tay Yong Kwang J allowed the appeal, ordering the seventh defendant to provide discovery and setting aside the judgment, finding that the defendants' failure was not contumelious. The plaintiff has appealed to the Court of Appeal against the whole of the decision.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal allowed, judgment set aside.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal regarding judgment against defendants for failing to comply with discovery order. The court allowed the appeal, finding no contumelious conduct.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Altvater Jakob Pte LtdPlaintiff, RespondentCorporationAppeal allowed, judgment set aside.Lost
Toh Eng PengDefendantIndividualJudgment against first defendantLost
Lim Hui KiangDefendantIndividualJudgment against third to sixth defendantsLost
Always Corporation Pte LtdDefendantCorporationJudgment against third to sixth defendantsLost
Toh Ng SiowDefendantIndividualJudgment against third to sixth defendantsLost
Sin Guan Lee Paper Pte LtdDefendantCorporationJudgment against third to sixth defendantsLost
Merger Link Sdn BhdDefendantCorporationJudgment against third to sixth defendantsLost
Paper Global Pte LtdDefendantCorporationJudgment against third to sixth defendantsLost
Tang SynnieDefendantIndividualAppeal allowed, judgment set aside.Won

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Tay Yong KwangJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The plaintiff belongs to the Sulo group of companies based in Germany.
  2. The plaintiff carries on the business of trading, collecting and processing waste paper for recycling and waste management.
  3. The fifth defendant sold its business and goodwill to the plaintiff and covenanted not to compete.
  4. The first defendant and his brother also covenanted not to compete with the plaintiff.
  5. The first defendant was employed as Vice-President of the plaintiff.
  6. The plaintiff discovered that the first defendant and his brothers had been conducting business in competition with the plaintiff.
  7. The third defendant wrongfully removed more than 428 container-loads of waste paper from the plaintiff’s warehouse.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Altvater Jakob Pte Ltd v Toh Eng Peng and Others, Suit 579/2003, RA 293 of 2004, [2004] SGHC 269

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Sale of business agreement signed
Third defendant incorporated
Third defendant incorporated
Order to file list of documents issued
Deadline to file list of documents
List of documents filed by seventh and eighth defendants
Plaintiff requested further discovery
Order for discovery granted
Deadline for discovery
Supplementary list of documents served
Unless order issued
Deadline for compliance with unless order
Supplementary list of documents filed
Summons filed for judgment
Affidavits filed to oppose application
Assistant Registrar granted plaintiff's application
Appeal allowed
Decision Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Failure to comply with 'unless order'
    • Outcome: The court found that the failure to comply with the 'unless order' was not contumelious or contumacious and allowed the appeal.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Related Cases:
      • [1999] 1 SLR 750

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Judgment

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of contract
  • Conspiracy

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Recycling
  • Waste Management

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Syed Mohamed Abdul Muthaliff v Arjan Bisham ChotraniCourt of AppealYes[1999] 1 SLR 750SingaporeCited for the principle that the power of the court to extend time for complying with an unless order should be exercised cautiously and the onus is on the defaulting party to show why his failure to obey the order did not warrant the striking out of the pleading.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Unless order
  • Discovery of documents
  • Contumelious
  • Contumacious
  • Sale of business agreement
  • Covenant not to compete

15.2 Keywords

  • Discovery
  • Compliance
  • Unless order
  • Competition
  • Covenant

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Civil Procedure
  • Contract Law