Samwoh Resources v Lee Ah Poh: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Damages Assessment

In Samwoh Resources Pte Ltd v Lee Ah Poh, the Singapore High Court assessed damages owed by Lee Ah Poh to Samwoh Resources Pte Ltd following a finding of fraudulent misrepresentation. Samwoh Resources claimed damages resulting from Lee Ah Poh's misrepresentation regarding the condition of equipment. The court determined the appropriate measure of damages and calculated the amount owed, considering factors such as the value of missing equipment, the value of recovered equipment, and the cost of renting replacement equipment. The court awarded damages of $190,284 to Samwoh Resources.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Damages assessed in favour of Samwoh Resources Pte Ltd.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Assessment of Damages

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

High Court case where Samwoh Resources sued Lee Ah Poh for fraudulent misrepresentation. The court assessed damages after finding liability.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Samwoh Resources Pte LtdPlaintiffCorporationDamages assessedWonRonald Choo
Lee Ah PohDefendantIndividualDamages assessed againstLostS. Thulasidas

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Amy Tung Chew MingAssistant RegistrarYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Ronald ChooRajah and Tann
S. ThulasidasLing Das and Partners

4. Facts

  1. Samwoh entered into a pre-bid agreement with Ng Huat Foundations Pte Ltd (NHF) for a quarry project.
  2. Lee Ah Poh, a director and majority shareholder of NHF, allegedly misrepresented the condition of equipment.
  3. Samwoh purchased equipment from Tokyo Leasing (Singapore) Pte Ltd (TL) for $330,000 based on Lee Ah Poh's representations.
  4. Some of the purchased equipment was missing, leading Samwoh to commence an action against Lee Ah Poh.
  5. The trial judge found fraudulent misrepresentation on Lee Ah Poh's part, ordering damages to be assessed.
  6. Some missing equipment was later found at a construction site.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Samwoh Resources Pte Ltd v Lee Ah Poh, Suit 829/2002, NA 53/2003, [2004] SGHC 83

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Samwoh purchased equipment from Tokyo Leasing (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
Invoice issued for equipment sold to Gali Batu.
Samwoh commenced action against Rosalind.
Assessment of damages hearing.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Measure of Damages for Fraudulent Misrepresentation
    • Outcome: The court applied the principle of putting the plaintiff in the position they would have been in had the misrepresentation not occurred.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Assessment of Damages
    • Outcome: The court determined the quantum of damages based on the purchase price, value of missing equipment, and cost of replacement rentals.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Fraudulent Misrepresentation
  • Tort of Deceit

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Construction

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Fraudulent Misrepresentation
  • Damages Assessment
  • Equipment Valuation
  • Loss of Use
  • Quarry Project

15.2 Keywords

  • fraudulent misrepresentation
  • damages
  • equipment
  • assessment
  • Samwoh Resources
  • Lee Ah Poh

16. Subjects

  • Contract Law
  • Tort Law
  • Civil Litigation
  • Damages

17. Areas of Law

  • Tort Law
  • Fraudulent Misrepresentation
  • Civil Procedure
  • Damages Assessment