Coterie International v MAE Engineering: Breach of Contract & Incentive Bonus Dispute
In the High Court of Singapore, Coterie International (S) Pte Ltd sued MAE Engineering Ltd for breach of contract, claiming unpaid bonuses. MAE Engineering counterclaimed for damages due to Coterie's breach of the termination clause and sought recovery of a payout made under a mistaken belief. The court, presided over by Choo Han Teck J, dismissed Coterie's claim for the 13th-month bonus but allowed its claim for the incentive bonus for 2001. The court dismissed MAE Engineering's counterclaim for the $50,000 payout but awarded nominal damages for Coterie's failure to provide proper notice of termination.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Judgment for Plaintiff in part; nominal damages awarded to Defendant.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Coterie International sues MAE Engineering for breach of contract regarding bonuses. MAE counterclaims for breach of termination clause and mistaken payment. The court partially ruled in favor of Coterie.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAE Engineering Ltd | Defendant | Corporation | Counterclaim dismissed; nominal damages awarded | Partial | |
Coterie International (S) Pte Ltd | Plaintiff | Corporation | Claim allowed in part | Partial |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Choo Han Teck | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- The plaintiff provided consultancy services to the defendant.
- A contract was signed between the plaintiff and defendant on 1 March 1997.
- The contract was extended for two years from 1 September 1997.
- The plaintiff stopped work on 21 October 2003 without giving three months’ notice.
- The defendant’s accounting records showed a profit of more than $2m after tax for 2001.
- The defendant paid the plaintiff $50,000 believing targets for 2000 had been met.
5. Formal Citations
- Coterie International (S) Pte Ltd v MAE Engineering Ltd, Suit 1112/2003, [2005] SGHC 18
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Contract signed between Coterie International (S) Pte Ltd and MAE Engineering Ltd. | |
Defendant's letter extending the agreement for two years and changing the termination clause. | |
Plaintiff offered to extend the agreement on an ongoing basis. | |
Defendant accepted the offer of extension with exception to the Incentive Scheme. | |
Plaintiff stopped work without giving the required notice. | |
Judgment issued. |
7. Legal Issues
- Breach of Contract
- Outcome: The court found that the plaintiff was in breach of contract for failing to give the requisite three months’ notice.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Failure to give requisite notice of termination
- Entitlement to Incentive Bonus
- Outcome: The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to the incentive bonus for the year 2001.
- Category: Substantive
- Recovery of Money Paid Under Mistake
- Outcome: The court found that there was no mistake in the payment of $50,000 and dismissed the defendant's claim for refund.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Monetary Damages
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Contract
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
11. Industries
- Construction
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No cited cases |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Incentive bonus
- Termination clause
- 13th month bonus
- Profitability
- Fee-in-lieu
- Notice of termination
15.2 Keywords
- Contract
- Breach
- Bonus
- Termination
- Singapore
- High Court
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Breach of Contract | 95 |
Contract Law | 90 |
Mistake | 60 |
Damages | 50 |
16. Subjects
- Contract Law
- Breach of Contract