Koh Swee Hoon v Yeo Hee Chong: Negligence and Contributory Negligence in Road Accident on Tampines Expressway
In Koh Swee Hoon Joanna Ophelia v Yeo Hee Chong, the High Court of Singapore addressed a negligence claim arising from a road accident on the Tampines Expressway (TPE). The plaintiff, Koh Swee Hoon Joanna Ophelia, collided with a stationary lorry driven by the defendant, Yeo Hee Chong. The court, presided over by Belinda Ang Saw Ean J, found the defendant negligent for leaving the lorry in a dangerous position but also held the plaintiff contributorily negligent for failing to keep a proper lookout. The court apportioned responsibility, awarding the plaintiff 60% of the assessed damages.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff; damages to be assessed by the registrar, reduced by 40% due to contributory negligence.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
High Court case involving a road accident where a scooter collided with a stationary lorry. The court considered negligence and contributory negligence, apportioning liability.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Koh Swee Hoon Joanna Ophelia | Plaintiff | Individual | Judgment for Plaintiff | Partial | |
Yeo Hee Chong | Defendant | Individual | Judgment Against Defendant | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Belinda Ang Saw Ean | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Benedict Chan | Benedict Chan and Partners |
Roy Monoj Kumar | Roy and Partners |
P E Ashokan | KhattarWong |
4. Facts
- Plaintiff's scooter collided with the rear of defendant's stationary lorry on the TPE.
- Defendant's lorry had a puncture and was stopped on the second lane of the TPE.
- Plaintiff was travelling at 60km/h and intended to filter onto the TPE.
- Plaintiff saw the lorry about 20m away but believed it to be moving.
- A vehicle in front of the plaintiff swerved left, revealing the stationary lorry.
- Plaintiff braked but collided with the lorry, sustaining injuries.
- The road surface was wet at the time of the accident.
5. Formal Citations
- Koh Swee Hoon Joanna Ophelia v Yeo Hee Chong, Suit 942/2004, [2005] SGHC 190
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Road traffic accident occurred | |
Defendant made police report | |
Defendant made report with the General Insurance Association of Singapore | |
Suit 942/2004 filed | |
Judgment delivered |
7. Legal Issues
- Breach of Duty of Care
- Outcome: The court found that the defendant breached his duty of care by leaving the lorry in a position that presented a possible source of danger to other road users.
- Category: Substantive
- Contributory Negligence
- Outcome: The court found the plaintiff contributorily negligent for failing to keep a proper lookout and following the vehicle in front too closely.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Monetary Damages
9. Cause of Actions
- Negligence
10. Practice Areas
- Personal Injury
- Motor Vehicle Accidents
- Civil Litigation
11. Industries
- Transportation
- Logistics
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ahmad Nordin bin Haji Maslan v Eng Ngak Hua | Unknown | Yes | [1985] 2 MLJ 431 | Malaysia | Cited but distinguished as fact-sensitive and not of assistance to the court. |
Moore v Maxwells of Emsworth Ltd | Unknown | Yes | [1968] 1 WLR 1077 | England and Wales | Cited but distinguished as fact-sensitive and not of assistance to the court. |
Kang Hock Seng Paul v Lee Teck Nam | High Court | Yes | [2002] SGHC 308 | Singapore | Cited but distinguished as fact-sensitive and not of assistance to the court. |
Ang Kuang Hoe v Chia Chor Yew | Unknown | Yes | [2004] 1 SLR 696 | Singapore | Followed for the test in Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd (1985) 59 ALR 529 regarding apportionment of responsibility. |
Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd | Unknown | Yes | (1985) 59 ALR 529 | Australia | Cited for the test regarding apportionment of responsibility in cases of contributory negligence. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Road Traffic (Expressway Traffic) Rules | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Road traffic accident
- Stationary lorry
- Tampines Expressway
- Contributory negligence
- Duty of care
- Hazard lights
- Breakdown sign
- Loyang Avenue
- Expressway Traffic Rules
15.2 Keywords
- negligence
- contributory negligence
- road accident
- expressway
- stationary vehicle
- duty of care
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Negligence | 95 |
Contributory negligence | 90 |
Automobile Accidents | 80 |
Torts | 75 |
Causation | 60 |
Civil Procedure | 30 |
Evidence | 25 |
Damages | 20 |
16. Subjects
- Tort Law
- Negligence Law
- Traffic Accidents