Emma Maersk: Negligence & Statutory Duty in Pilot Disembarkation

In the case of *Kulasegaram Ranjakunalan v The "Emma Maersk"*, heard in the High Court of Singapore on 13 October 2006, the plaintiff, a harbor pilot, claimed damages for injuries sustained while disembarking from the defendant's ship, the "Emma Maersk". The plaintiff alleged negligence, breach of statutory duty, and breach of duty as an invitee. The court, presided over by Judith Prakash J, dismissed the claim, finding no breach of duty on the part of the defendant.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Claim dismissed with costs.

1.3 Case Type

Admiralty

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Personal injury claim where a harbor pilot was injured disembarking from a ship. The court found no breach of duty by the defendant.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Kulasegaram RanjakunalanPlaintiffIndividualClaim DismissedLost
Emma MaerskDefendantCorporationJudgment for DefendantWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Judith PrakashJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiff, a harbor pilot, was injured while disembarking from the defendant's ship.
  2. The accident occurred when the pilot boat went under the gangway, lifting it and causing the plaintiff to fall.
  3. The plaintiff claimed the defendant breached its duty to provide a safe disembarkation method.
  4. The defendant argued the pilot boat was responsible for guiding the height of the gangway.
  5. The court found the ship followed the pilot boat's instructions regarding the gangway height.
  6. The court determined the accident was caused by the pilot boat's improper approach.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Emma Maersk, Adm in Rem 67/2004, [2006] SGHC 180

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Plaintiff instructed to assist in navigation of the ship.
Plaintiff injured while disembarking from the ship.
Judgment reserved.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Duty
    • Outcome: The court found no breach of duty on the part of the defendant.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Negligence
    • Outcome: The court found no negligence on the part of the defendant.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Negligence
  • Breach of Statutory Duty

10. Practice Areas

  • Personal Injury
  • Maritime Law

11. Industries

  • Maritime

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Merchant Shipping (Safety Convention) Regulations (Cap 179, Rg 11, 1999 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Gangway
  • Pilot boat
  • Disembarkation
  • Negligence
  • Statutory duty
  • Pilot transfer arrangements
  • Telescopic cylinder

15.2 Keywords

  • Personal injury
  • Pilot disembarkation
  • Negligence
  • Statutory duty
  • Shipping accident

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Shipping
  • Personal Injury
  • Torts