Chinese Calligraphy Society v Khoo Seng Kong: Passing Off Dispute

The Chinese Calligraphy Society of Singapore sued Khoo Seng Kong in the High Court of Singapore on 30 July 2008, alleging passing off. The Society claimed that Khoo Seng Kong's use of the name 'Singapore Calligraphy Centre' was confusingly similar to the Society's use of the same name for its building and activities, thereby damaging the Society's reputation and fundraising efforts. The court ruled in favor of the Society, granting the injunctions and ordering an assessment of damages.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for Plaintiff

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The Chinese Calligraphy Society sued Khoo Seng Kong for passing off, alleging he used a confusingly similar name. The court ruled in favor of the Society.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
The Chinese Calligraphy Society of SingaporePlaintiffAssociationJudgment for PlaintiffWon
Khoo Seng KongDefendantIndividualClaim DismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Tay Yong KwangJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The plaintiff is a society registered under the Societies Act since 1968.
  2. The plaintiff adopted the name Singapore Calligraphy Centre in 1994 for its building.
  3. The plaintiff has been using the name Singapore Calligraphy Centre since 1995.
  4. The defendant registered a sole proprietorship with the name Singapore Calligraphy Centre in 2005.
  5. The defendant used to be a member of the plaintiff.
  6. The plaintiff claims the defendant's use of the name caused confusion and diverted funds.
  7. The plaintiff's funding comes from government grants and public donations.

5. Formal Citations

  1. The Chinese Calligraphy Society of Singapore v Khoo Seng Kong, Suit 481/2006, [2008] SGHC 121

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Society registered under the Societies Act
National Arts Council agreed to lease building to plaintiff
Plaintiff adopted the name Singapore Calligraphy Centre
Plaintiff moved into the building
Singapore Calligraphy Centre declared open
Defendant registered sole proprietorship
Plaintiff's member informed president of defendant's use of name
Plaintiff's president registered company known as Singapore Calligraphy Centre (1995)
Plaintiff's solicitors sent letter to defendant
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Passing Off
    • Outcome: The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, finding that the defendant had passed off his business as being associated with the plaintiff.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [1990] 1 WLR 491
      • [2000] 3 SLR 145
      • [1998] 2 SLR 550

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Injunction to restrain passing off
  2. Mandatory injunction to terminate registration of sole proprietorship
  3. Delivery up of printed or written matter
  4. Assessment of damages or account of profits

9. Cause of Actions

  • Passing Off

10. Practice Areas

  • Intellectual Property Litigation

11. Industries

  • Arts and Culture

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden IncN/AYes[1990] 1 WLR 491N/ACited for the three elements required to establish passing off: goodwill, misrepresentation, and damage.
Super Coffeemix Manufacturing Ltd v Unico Trading Pte LtdN/AYes[2000] 3 SLR 145SingaporeCited for the three elements required to establish passing off: goodwill, misrepresentation, and damage.
The Clock Ltd v The Clock House HotelN/AYes(1936) 53 RPC 269N/ACited as an example of acquiring goodwill in a name used for a building where business is carried out.
CDL Hotels International Ltd v Pontiac Marina Pte LtdCourt of AppealYes[1998] 2 SLR 550SingaporeCited for the principle that parties in a passing off action need not be in mutual competition and that geographical names can be distinctive.
British Legion v British Legion Club (Street) LtdN/AYes(1931) 48 RPC 555N/ACited to show that a social club could be viewed as connected in some way with a charitable organization.
Jumbo Seafood Pte Ltd & Anor v Hong Kong Jumbo Seafood Restaurant Pte LtdN/AYes[1998] 1 SLR 860SingaporeCited for the principle that even without intention to cause confusion, liability can still arise if the use of names is likely to cause confusion.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Property Tax Act (Cap 254, 2005 Rev Ed) s 52(2)(b)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Passing off
  • Goodwill
  • Misrepresentation
  • Singapore Calligraphy Centre
  • Chinese Calligraphy Society of Singapore

15.2 Keywords

  • Passing off
  • Chinese Calligraphy Society
  • Singapore Calligraphy Centre
  • Intellectual Property
  • Goodwill
  • Misrepresentation

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Intellectual Property
  • Passing Off
  • Tort Law