AAG v Estate of AAH: Illegitimate Child's Claim for Maintenance Under Inheritance (Family Provision) Act

In AAG v Estate of AAH, deceased, the High Court of Singapore, on 11 February 2009, addressed whether illegitimate children could claim maintenance from a deceased's estate under the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act (Cap 138, 1985 Rev Ed). Choo Han Teck J held that, based on the original interpretation of the UK legislation upon which the Act was based, illegitimate children could not claim such maintenance. Consequently, the plaintiff's application for maintenance for her two illegitimate daughters was dismissed.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Application dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Family

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The High Court held that illegitimate children cannot claim maintenance from a deceased's estate under the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
AAGPlaintiffIndividualApplication dismissedLost
Estate of AAH, deceasedDefendantTrustApplication dismissedWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The plaintiff sought maintenance from the deceased's estate for her two daughters.
  2. The daughters were born out of wedlock and are the illegitimate children of the deceased.
  3. The plaintiff brought the action under the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act (Cap 138, 1985 Rev Ed).

5. Formal Citations

  1. AAG v Estate of AAH, deceased, OS 1136/2008, [2009] SGHC 33

6. Timeline

DateEvent
OS 1136/2008 filed
Judgment reserved
Application dismissed

7. Legal Issues

  1. Whether illegitimate child could claim maintenance under the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act
    • Outcome: The court held that an illegitimate child cannot apply for maintenance under the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Reasonable maintenance from the estate of the deceased

9. Cause of Actions

  • Claim for maintenance under the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act

10. Practice Areas

  • Family Provision
  • Estate Law

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Makein v MakeinChancery DivisionYes[1955] 1 Ch 194England and WalesCited for the established interpretation of the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act 1938 (UK) that it excluded illegitimate children from making maintenance claims against the estate of a deceased.
PP v Low Kok HengHigh CourtYes[2007] 4 SLR 183SingaporeCited regarding the interpretation of statutes under s 9A of the Interpretation Act (Cap 1, 1999 Rev Ed).

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Inheritance (Family Provision) Act (Cap 138, 1985 Rev Ed)Singapore
Inheritance (Family Provision) Act 1938 (UK)United Kingdom
Family Law Reform Act 1969 (UK)United Kingdom
Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependents) Act 1975 (UK)United Kingdom
Interpretation Act (Cap 1, 1999 Rev Ed)Singapore
Women’s Charter (Cap 353, 1997 Rev Ed)Singapore
Civil Law Act (Cap 43, 1999 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Illegitimate children
  • Maintenance
  • Inheritance (Family Provision) Act
  • Estate of deceased
  • Daughter
  • Born out of wedlock

15.2 Keywords

  • illegitimate child
  • maintenance
  • inheritance
  • family provision
  • estate

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Family Law
  • Inheritance
  • Legitimacy