Standard Chartered Bank v Loh Chong Yong Thomas: Striking Out Application & Bankrupt's Locus Standi

In Standard Chartered Bank v Loh Chong Yong Thomas, the Court of Appeal of Singapore heard an appeal by Standard Chartered Bank against Loh Chong Yong Thomas, a bankrupt, regarding a striking-out application. The bank sought to strike out Loh's suit for breach of contract, tort, and defamation, arguing he lacked locus standi due to his bankruptcy. The court allowed the appeal, holding that Loh required the Official Assignee's prior sanction to bring the suit, which he did not obtain, and that his claims for breach of contract and tort vested in the Official Assignee.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Court of Appeal

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Allowed

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal regarding a striking-out application. The court addressed whether a bankrupt had the right to sue without the Official Assignee's sanction.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Standard Chartered BankAppellantCorporationAppeal AllowedWonPatrick Ang, Chin Wei Lin, Jonathan Lee
Loh Chong Yong ThomasRespondentIndividualAppeal DismissedLostAndre Arul

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Chan Sek KeongChief JusticeYes
Andrew Phang Boon LeongJustice of the Court of AppealYes
V K RajahJustice of the Court of AppealYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Patrick AngRajah & Tann LLP
Chin Wei LinRajah & Tann LLP
Jonathan LeeRajah & Tann LLP
Andre ArulArul Chew & Partners
Chan Wang HoInsolvency & Public Trustee's Office

4. Facts

  1. The respondent, a lawyer, maintained bank accounts with the appellant, Standard Chartered Bank.
  2. The respondent's partner embezzled $413,000 from the firm's client account.
  3. The appellant commenced an action against the respondent to recover an outstanding debt.
  4. The respondent counterclaimed for negligence, alleging the appellant allowed unauthorized withdrawals.
  5. The respondent was made a bankrupt on 4 July 2003.
  6. The respondent commenced a District Court Suit against the appellant without prior sanction from the Official Assignee.
  7. The respondent alleged unauthorized transactions and wrongful dishonoring of cheques.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Standard Chartered Bank v Loh Chong Yong Thomas, Civil Appeal No 47 of 2009, [2010] SGCA 2

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Lim Yee Kai embezzled funds from the firm's client account.
Lim Yee Kai embezzled funds from the firm's client account.
Standard Chartered Bank commenced an action against the respondent.
First cheque dishonored.
Second cheque dishonored.
Third cheque dishonored.
Settlement letter was signed.
Loh Chong Yong Thomas was made a bankrupt.
District Court Suit No 2018 of 2004 commenced.
Writ served on the appellant.
First amendment to statement of claim.
Second amendment to statement of claim.
Appellant's appeal dismissed by a district judge.
Appellant obtained leave to appeal.
Judgment reserved.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Locus Standi of Bankrupt
    • Outcome: The court held that the bankrupt lacked locus standi to bring the action without the Official Assignee's prior sanction, except for the defamation claim.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Right of bankrupt to maintain action without Official Assignee's sanction
      • Vesting of property in Official Assignee upon bankruptcy
  2. Interpretation of 'Injury to Person'
    • Outcome: The court held that defamation is not considered an injury to the person under s 131(1)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Whether defamation constitutes injury to the person under bankruptcy law
  3. Retrospective Sanction
    • Outcome: The court held that the Official Assignee's sanction must be obtained prior to commencing the action and cannot be granted retrospectively.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Validity of Official Assignee's sanction obtained after commencement of action

8. Remedies Sought

  1. General Damages
  2. Exemplary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract
  • Negligence
  • Defamation

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Insolvency Law

11. Industries

  • Banking
  • Legal Services

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Law Society of Singapore v Lim Yee KaiHigh CourtYes[1998] 2 SLR(R) 895SingaporeCited for the finding that the respondent had adopted a cavalier attitude towards the firm's accounts.
Ord v UptonEnglish Court of AppealYes[2000] Ch 352EnglandCited to determine the meaning of 'property' in the context of bankruptcy and what vests in the Official Assignee.
Daniel Beckham v William Walker Drake and John SurgeyHouse of LordsYes2 HL Cas 579EnglandCited for the principle that actions for damages to the body, mind, or character of a bankrupt do not vest in the trustee.
Heath v TangUnspecifiedYes[1993] 1 W.L.R. 1421EnglandCited for the principle that certain causes of action personal to the bankrupt do not vest in his trustee.
Wilson v United Counties Bank, LimitedHouse of LordsYes[1920] A.C. 102EnglandCited for the principle that claims for damage to the person or reputation of the bankrupt remain vested in the bankrupt.
Goh Eng Hwa v M/s Laksamana Realty Sdn BhdMalaysian Court of AppealYes[2004] 3 MLJ 97MalaysiaCited regarding whether the Official Assignee's sanction requires an assignment of property back to the bankrupt.
K Ismail Ganey Rowther v M A Abdul Kader and The Official Assignee of the Property of K P Peer Mohamed, a BankruptCourt of Appeal of the Federated Malay StatesYes[1933] MLJ 98MalaysiaCited regarding whether the Official Assignee's sanction divests the property vested in him.
Overseas Union Bank v Lew Keh LamCourt of AppealYes[1998] 3 SLR(R) 219SingaporeCited for the interpretation of 'leave of the court' in the context of bankruptcy legislation.
Loh Chong Yong Thomas v Standard Chartered BankDistrict CourtYes[2007] SGDC 82SingaporeCited as the decision under appeal.
Sharifah Aini binte Syed Jaafar v Karangkraf Sdn BhdUnspecifiedYes[1989] 2 CLJ 1269MalaysiaCited as a Malaysian defamation case that took the same position as K Ismail.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 1994 Rev Ed) s 27ASingapore
Legal Profession (Solicitors’ Accounts) Rules (Cap 161, R 8, 1990 Rev Ed)Singapore
Bankruptcy Act (Cap 20, 2000 Rev Ed) s 131(1)(a)Singapore
Bankruptcy Act (Cap 20, 2000 Rev Ed) s 76(1)(a)(i)Singapore
Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322, 2007 Rev Ed) s 34(2)(d)Singapore
Insolvency Act 1986 (c 45) (UK) s 436United Kingdom
Bankruptcy Act 1967 (Act 360, 1988 Rev Ed) (M’sia) s 38(1)(a)Malaysia
Bankruptcy Ordinance 1888 (SS Ord No 2 of 1888) s 33(1)(a)Singapore
Bankruptcy Enactment 1912 (No 2 of 1912) (FMS) s 33(i)(a)Malaysia
Bankruptcy Act 1995 (Act 15 of 1995)Singapore
Bankruptcy Act (Cap 20, 1996 Rev Ed) s 76(1)(c)(ii)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Bankruptcy
  • Official Assignee
  • Locus Standi
  • Choses in Action
  • Sanction
  • Defamation
  • Injury to Person
  • Retrospective Sanction

15.2 Keywords

  • Bankruptcy
  • Official Assignee
  • Locus Standi
  • Defamation
  • Injury to Person
  • Singapore
  • Court of Appeal

16. Subjects

  • Bankruptcy
  • Civil Procedure
  • Banking Law
  • Defamation

17. Areas of Law

  • Bankruptcy Law
  • Civil Procedure
  • Defamation Law
  • Contract Law
  • Tort Law