Yam Lai Lin Angeline v Campbell Harvey Llewellyn: Division of Matrimonial Assets
In the High Court of Singapore, Woo Bih Li J presided over an ancillary matrimonial proceeding between Yam Lai Lin Angeline (the Wife) and Campbell Harvey Llewellyn (the Husband) concerning the division of their matrimonial flat. The court ordered the Bishan flat to be sold in the open market and the net sale proceeds to be divided 80:20 between the Wife and the Husband, with each party to use their share to reimburse their Central Provident Fund accounts. The Husband's appeal against this decision was dismissed.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Appeal dismissed; order made for the Bishan flat to be sold in the open market and the net sale proceeds to be divided 80:20 between the Wife and the Husband respectively.
1.3 Case Type
Family
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Appeal regarding the division of matrimonial assets, specifically the Bishan flat, in a divorce case. The court ordered the flat to be sold and proceeds divided 80:20.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yam Lai Lin Angeline | Petitioner | Individual | Appeal dismissed; order made for the Bishan flat to be sold in the open market and the net sale proceeds to be divided 80:20 between the Wife and the Husband respectively. | Won | |
Campbell Harvey Llewellyn | Respondent | Individual | Appeal dismissed; order made for the Bishan flat to be sold in the open market and the net sale proceeds to be divided 80:20 between the Wife and the Husband respectively. | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Woo Bih Li | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Seenivasan Lalita | Virginia Quek Lalita & Partners |
4. Facts
- The parties were married on 22 May 1983 and have two children.
- The Wife obtained a personal protection order against the Husband in 1997, which was later rescinded.
- The Wife obtained another personal protection order against the Husband in 1998 for herself and her son.
- The Wife petitioned for divorce on 10 March 2003 on the ground that the parties had lived apart for four years.
- The Wife had paid $48,000 from her CPF account towards the acquisition of the Bishan flat.
- The Husband had paid $7,458 from his CPF account and $50,650 in cash towards the Bishan flat.
- The Wife single-handedly brought up the children in an environment of violence from the Husband.
5. Formal Citations
- Yam Lai Lin Angeline v Campbell Harvey Llewellyn, Divorce Petition No 600777 of 2003 (Registrar's Appeal No 720017 of 2009), [2010] SGHC 102
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Parties married | |
Daughter born | |
Son born | |
Wife obtained a personal protection order against the Husband by consent | |
Personal protection order rescinded by consent | |
Wife and children left the Bishan flat | |
Wife obtained another personal protection order against the Husband for herself and on behalf of her son | |
Wife petitioned for divorce | |
Decree nisi granted | |
Ancillary matters fixed before the District Judge | |
Order for sale of Bishan flat at no less than $480,000 made | |
Judgment issued |
7. Legal Issues
- Division of Matrimonial Assets
- Outcome: The court ordered the Bishan flat to be sold in the open market and the net sale proceeds to be divided 80:20 between the Wife and the Husband respectively.
- Category: Substantive
- Related Cases:
- [1999] 2 SLR(R) 385
8. Remedies Sought
- Division of Matrimonial Assets
9. Cause of Actions
- No cause of actions
10. Practice Areas
- Divorce
- Family Litigation
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tay Sin Tor v Tan Chay Eng | Unknown | Yes | [1999] 2 SLR(R) 385 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that apportionment between parties should be made first, and then parties should use their respective shares to reimburse their own CPF accounts and interest. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Matrimonial Assets
- Bishan Flat
- Central Provident Fund
- Personal Protection Order
- Apportionment
- Sale Proceeds
15.2 Keywords
- Divorce
- Matrimonial Assets
- Singapore
- Family Law
- Property Division
17. Areas of Law
16. Subjects
- Family Law
- Divorce
- Matrimonial Assets