Zaiton Bee Bee v Chan Poh Teong: Assessment of Damages for Personal Injury in Traffic Accident

In Zaiton Bee Bee bte Abdul Majeed v Chan Poh Teong, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal regarding the assessment of damages for personal injuries sustained by Zaiton Bee Bee in a traffic accident while she was a passenger in a taxi driven by Chan Poh Teong. The primary legal issue was the assessment of damages, particularly concerning pre-trial and post-trial loss of earnings. The court allowed the plaintiff's appeal for post-trial loss of earnings and costs, while dismissing the defendant's cross-appeal regarding pre-trial loss of earnings.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Plaintiff's appeal allowed in relation to the claim for post-trial loss of earnings and costs. Defendant's appeal dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

High Court assesses damages for Zaiton Bee Bee, injured in a traffic accident while in Chan Poh Teong's taxi, focusing on loss of earnings.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Zaiton Bee Bee bte Abdul MajeedPlaintiff, AppellantIndividualAppeal allowed in partPartial
Chan Poh TeongDefendant, RespondentIndividualAppeal dismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Judith PrakashJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiff was injured in a traffic accident on 22 April 2005 while a passenger in a taxi driven by the defendant.
  2. Plaintiff sustained a fracture/dislocation of the thoracic 12th vertebra and the lumbar first vertebra (T12/L1).
  3. Plaintiff also sustained a fracture of her right rib and a fracture of the fifth metatarsal of her left foot.
  4. Plaintiff claimed damages including pain, suffering, loss of amenities, loss of future earnings, and medical expenses.
  5. Assistant Registrar awarded $188,146.63 but made no award for post-trial loss of earnings or loss of earning capacity.
  6. Surveillance video showed the plaintiff teaching henna painting for two and a half hours.
  7. Medical experts agreed the plaintiff's injuries were serious and of a permanent nature.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Zaiton Bee Bee bte Abdul Majeed v Chan Poh Teong, Suit No 731 of 2006 (Registrar's Appeals No 266 of 2008 and 275 of 2008), [2010] SGHC 116

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Plaintiff injured in traffic accident
Surveillance conducted on plaintiff
Plaintiff seen at Dr Chang’s clinic
Plaintiff observed giving henna painting lesson
Plaintiff obtained interlocutory judgment against defendant
Assessment hearing took place
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Assessment of Damages
    • Outcome: The court adjusted the basis for calculating pre-trial loss of earnings but maintained the original amount awarded. The court also awarded post-trial loss of earnings.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Pre-trial loss of earnings
      • Post-trial loss of earnings
      • Loss of earning capacity
  2. Costs
    • Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiff’s appeal in relation to costs and set aside the costs order made below, ordering costs of the assessment in her favor.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Negligence

10. Practice Areas

  • Personal Injury Litigation
  • Civil Litigation

11. Industries

  • Transportation
  • Arts and Crafts

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Teo Seng Kiat v Goh Hwa TeckCourt of AppealYes[2003] 1 SLR 333SingaporeCited for the multiplier used in assessing damages for loss of earnings where the plaintiff is totally unable to work.
Swee Hong Investment Pte Ltd v Swee Hong Exim Pte LtdCourt of AppealYes[1994] 3 SLR(R) 259SingaporeCited regarding the apportionment of costs when a party's submissions are not helpful to the court.
Loh Chia Mei v Kok Kok HanHigh CourtYes[2009] SGHC 181SingaporeCited for the approach of awarding the full multiplicand for the first half of the multiplier and half the multiplicand for the next half of the multiplier when assessing damages for loss of future earnings.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Subordinate Courts Act (Cap 321, 2007 Rev Ed), section 39Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Henna art
  • Loss of earnings
  • Assessment of damages
  • Traffic accident
  • Personal injury
  • Medical evidence
  • Surveillance video
  • Multiplier
  • Multiplicand

15.2 Keywords

  • personal injury
  • traffic accident
  • damages
  • loss of earnings
  • henna art
  • assessment
  • Singapore

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Personal Injury
  • Damages Assessment
  • Civil Litigation