Koh Chai Kwang v Teo Ai Ling: Appeal on Damages for Motor Accident Injuries and Loss of Future Earnings

In Koh Chai Kwang v Teo Ai Ling, the Court of Appeal of Singapore heard an appeal regarding the High Court's decision on damages awarded to Teo Ai Ling for injuries sustained in a motor accident. The primary legal issue was whether Teo Ai Ling was entitled to damages for loss of future earnings (LFE) or loss of earning capacity (LEC). The Court of Appeal substituted the High Court's award for LFE with a provisional damage order based on LEC, modifying the judgment accordingly.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Court of Appeal

1.2 Outcome

Appeal allowed in part; provisional damage order made based on loss of earning capacity.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal regarding damages awarded to Teo Ai Ling for injuries sustained in a motor accident, focusing on loss of future earnings. Court of Appeal modified the judgment.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Koh Chai KwangAppellantIndividualAppeal allowed in partPartial
Teo Ai Ling (by her next friend, Chua Wee Bee)RespondentIndividualJudgment modified; provisional damage order made based on loss of earning capacityPartial

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Chao Hick TinJustice of the Court of AppealYes
Andrew Phang Boon LeongJustice of the Court of AppealNo
V K RajahJustice of the Court of AppealNo

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Teo Ai Ling sustained serious injuries in a motor accident on 12 July 2004.
  2. Koh Chai Kwang's motorcycle collided with Teo Ai Ling.
  3. Teo Ai Ling was hospitalized for 36 days at National University Hospital and 51 days at Tan Tock Seng Rehabilitation Centre.
  4. Teo Ai Ling suffered blindness in her right eye, left facial weakness, and hearing loss.
  5. Teo Ai Ling suffered cognitive dysfunction due to brain injury.
  6. Teo Ai Ling deferred her Business Studies at Ngee Ann Polytechnic for three years due to the accident.
  7. Teo Ai Ling failed to pass the Polytechnic examinations and was not awarded the Diploma.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Koh Chai Kwang v Teo Ai Ling (by her next friend, Chua Wee Bee), Civil Appeal No 42 of 2010, [2011] SGCA 23

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Motor accident occurred involving Koh Chai Kwang's motorcycle and Teo Ai Ling.
Teo Ai Ling was given hospitalisation leave.
End of Teo Ai Ling's hospitalisation leave.
Teo Ai Ling resumed her education at Ngee Ann Polytechnic.
The decision from which this appeal arose is reported at [2010] 2 SLR 1037.
Judgment reserved by the Court of Appeal.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Loss of Future Earnings
    • Outcome: The court substituted the award for loss of future earnings with a provisional damage order based on loss of earning capacity.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2010] 3 SLR 587
  2. Loss of Earning Capacity
    • Outcome: The court made a provisional damage order based on loss of earning capacity.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2010] 3 SLR 587
  3. Assessment of Damages for Cognitive Disabilities
    • Outcome: The court upheld the enhanced award for cognitive disabilities.
    • Category: Substantive
  4. Provisional Damages
    • Outcome: The court made a provisional damage order.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Damages for personal injuries
  2. Damages for loss of future earnings
  3. Damages for loss of earning capacity

9. Cause of Actions

  • Negligence

10. Practice Areas

  • Personal Injury Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Chai Kang Wei Samuel v Shaw Linda GillianCourt of AppealYes[2010] 3 SLR 587SingaporeCited for clarifying the law on loss of future earnings and loss of earning capacity, stating that they are distinct and not alternative measures.
Smith v Manchester CorporationN/AYes[1974] 1 KIR 1N/ACited for the view that loss of future earnings refers to the difference between post-accident and pre-accident incomes, while loss of earning capacity addresses the weakening of the plaintiff’s competitive position in the open labour market.
Teo Ai Ling (by her next friend Chua Wee Bee) v Koh Chai KwangHigh CourtYes[2010] SGHC 54SingaporeThe decision from which this appeal arose. The Court of Appeal modified the High Court's decision.
Herring v Ministry of DefenceN/AYes[2004] 1 All ER 44N/ACited for the principle of selecting a specific career model to determine loss of future earnings, especially for young claimants or those pursuing further qualifications.
Paul v RendellN/AYes(1981) 55 ALJR 371N/ACited to support the view that any determination based on future events, as an award of loss of future earnings would be, must necessarily involve some degree of speculation.
Teo Sing Keng & Anor v Sim Ban KiatCourt of AppealYes[1994] 1 SLR(R) 340SingaporeCited for the principle that an award for loss of earning capacity is generally made where there is no available evidence of the plaintiff’s earnings to enable the court to properly calculate future earnings.
Lai Chi Kay and others v Lee Kuo ShinN/AYes[1981-1982] SLR(R) 71SingaporeCited as an example where damages based on loss of future earnings were awarded to an injured party who had yet to enter the employment market.
Tham Yew Heng and another v Chong Toh ChengN/AYes[1983-1984] SLR(R) 782SingaporeCited as an example where the court made an award based on loss of future earnings to a nine-year-old boy whose school performance deteriorated after the accident.
Peh Diana and another v Tan Miang LeeHigh CourtYes[1991] 1 SLR(R) 22SingaporeCited as an example where the High Court awarded loss of future earnings to a sixteen-year-old student who suffered from permanent disabilities and was unable to continue attending a normal school after the accident.
Chang Ah Lek and others v Lim Ah KoonN/AYes[1998] 3 SLR(R) 551SingaporeCited to clarify that the review of Diana Peh was not in relation to the award of loss of future earnings but to the principles governing an appeal from the High Court Judge to the Court of Appeal.
Tan Yu Min Winston v Uni-Fruitveg Pte LtdN/AYes[2008] 4 SLR(R) 825SingaporeCited as a case involving students who were injured and who were only awarded loss of earning capacity.
Muhamad Ilyas bin Mirza Abdul Hamid v Kwek Khim HuiHigh CourtYes[2004] SGHC 12SingaporeCited as a case involving students who were injured and who were only awarded loss of earning capacity.
Lim Yuen Li Eugene v Singapore Shuttle Bus Service Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2005] SGHC 189SingaporeCited as a case involving students who were injured and who were only awarded loss of earning capacity.
Clark Jonathan Michael v Lee Khee ChungHigh CourtYes[2010] 1 SLR 209SingaporeCited as a case involving students who were injured and who were only awarded loss of earning capacity.
Akhinur Nashu Kazi v Chong Siak Hong (trading as Hong Hwa Marine Services)High CourtYes[2009] SGHC 138SingaporeCited for the risk of overlap when 'sub-itemising' what was essentially one single head injury could give rise to over-compensation.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Supreme Court of Judicature ActSingapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Loss of future earnings
  • Loss of earning capacity
  • Cognitive disabilities
  • Provisional damages
  • Multiplicand
  • Multiplier
  • Medical evidence
  • Polytechnic diploma
  • Motor accident
  • Brain injury

15.2 Keywords

  • Motor accident
  • Personal injury
  • Loss of future earnings
  • Loss of earning capacity
  • Cognitive disabilities
  • Provisional damages
  • Singapore
  • Court of Appeal

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Damages
  • Civil Procedure