Martinez v. Public Prosecutor: Criminal Defamation & Public Prosecutor's Discretion
Marites Dela Cruz Martinez, a Filipina domestic worker, appealed against the acquittal of the second respondent, who she claimed defamed her. The High Court, presided over by Choo Han Teck J, dismissed the appeal, holding that only the Public Prosecutor has the right to appeal an acquittal. The court upheld the Public Prosecutor's discretion to discontinue proceedings, even at the trial stage, and stated that any grievances against the Public Prosecutor's exercise of discretion should be brought under a separate originating action.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
1.3 Case Type
Criminal
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Appeal against acquittal in criminal defamation case dismissed. Public Prosecutor's discretion to discontinue proceedings upheld; private person has no right of appeal.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marites Dela Cruz Martinez | Appellant | Individual | Appeal Dismissed | Lost | Glenn Knight |
Public Prosecutor | Respondent | Government Agency | Nolle Prosequi Entered | Neutral | Eugene Lee, Kevin Yong |
Dr Ashok Segar | Other | Individual | |||
Second respondent | Respondent | Other | Acquitted | Won | Chen Chee Yen, Rubin Mukkam |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Choo Han Teck | J | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Glenn Knight | Glenn Knight |
Eugene Lee | Deputy Public Prosecutors |
Kevin Yong | Deputy Public Prosecutors |
Chen Chee Yen | Tan Rajah & Cheah |
Rubin Mukkam | Tan Rajah & Cheah |
4. Facts
- The appellant, a Filipina domestic worker, believed she was defamed by the second respondent's complaints.
- The appellant swore a Magistrate's Complaint against the second respondent for criminal defamation.
- The Public Prosecutor intervened during a pre-trial conference and entered a nolle prosequi.
- The trial judge discharged and acquitted the second respondent based on the Public Prosecutor's decision.
- The appellant appealed against the order of acquittal.
5. Formal Citations
- Marites Dela Cruz Martinez v Public Prosecutor and another, Magistrate's Appeal No 367 of 2010 (MSC 1713-1714 of 2010), [2011] SGHC 51
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Magistrate’s Complaint sworn against the second respondent. | |
Pre-trial conference held; Public Prosecutor entered a nolle prosequi. | |
Criminal Procedure Code 2010 came into effect. | |
Appeal dismissed. |
7. Legal Issues
- Public Prosecutor's Discretion
- Outcome: The court upheld the Public Prosecutor's discretion to discontinue proceedings.
- Category: Procedural
- Sub-Issues:
- Intervention by Public Prosecutor
- Nolle prosequi
- Related Cases:
- [1999] 1 SLR(R) 616
- [1988] 2 SLR(R) 110
- [1960] MLJ 152
- Right to Appeal
- Outcome: The court held that a private person has no right to appeal an acquittal; only the Public Prosecutor can appeal.
- Category: Procedural
- Sub-Issues:
- Private prosecution
- Appeal against acquittal
8. Remedies Sought
- Criminal Prosecution
9. Cause of Actions
- Criminal Defamation
10. Practice Areas
- Criminal Litigation
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jasbir Kaur v Mukhtiar Singh | N/A | Yes | [1999] 1 SLR(R) 616 | Singapore | Approved the views of Lai Kew Chai J in Hawa bte Haji Mohamed Hussain v Miranda regarding the interests of the State in criminal matters. |
Hawa bte Haji Mohamed Hussain v Miranda | N/A | Yes | [1988] 2 SLR(R) 110 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the interests of the State in a criminal matter are not always the same as those of a complainant. |
Ponniah v Lim | N/A | Yes | [1960] MLJ 152 | N/A | Cited for the principle that a complainant may allow private passions and prejudices to creep into the conduct of a criminal appeal. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Penal Code (Cap 224, 1985 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 1985 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (Act 15 of 2010) | Singapore |
Oaths and Declarations Act (Cap 211, 2001 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Nolle prosequi
- Public Prosecutor's discretion
- Criminal defamation
- Right to appeal
- Private prosecution
- Acquittal
15.2 Keywords
- Criminal defamation
- Public Prosecutor
- Nolle prosequi
- Right to appeal
- Acquittal
- Singapore High Court
16. Subjects
- Criminal Procedure
- Defamation
- Constitutional Law
17. Areas of Law
- Criminal Law
- Criminal Procedure
- Defamation Law