JBB v JBA: Costs in Matrimonial Proceedings and Divorce Judgments
In JBB v JBA, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal regarding costs in matrimonial proceedings. The husband, JBB, appealed against the grant of an interim judgment of divorce to the wife, JBA. The court dismissed the appeal and awarded costs of the appeal to the wife. The court provided guidance on awarding costs in matrimonial proceedings, emphasizing the court's discretion and the need to minimize acrimony between parties.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Appeal dismissed; costs of the appeal awarded to the wife.
1.3 Case Type
Family
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
High Court decision on costs in matrimonial proceedings, dismissing the husband's appeal and awarding costs to the wife. The court outlines principles for awarding costs in divorce cases.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Debbie Ong | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Mahadevan Lukshumayeh | S T Chelvan & Company |
Sandra Segeram Mahendra | Segeram & Co |
4. Facts
- The parties were married on 17 November 1994.
- The wife commenced divorce proceedings in October 2012.
- The wife initially based her divorce petition on four years' separation.
- The wife later amended her writ to rely on the husband's behavior.
- The District Judge granted an interim judgment of divorce in October 2014.
- The District Judge ordered that parties bear their own costs.
- The husband appealed against the decision of the District Judge.
5. Formal Citations
- JBB v JBA, District Court Appeal from the Family Courts No [X], [2015] SGHCF 6
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Parties married in Singapore | |
Wife commenced divorce proceedings | |
Wife amended writ to rely on husband's behavior | |
District Judge granted an interim judgment of divorce | |
Costs of the appeal awarded to the wife | |
Decision Date |
7. Legal Issues
- Award of Costs in Matrimonial Proceedings
- Outcome: The court held that the award of costs lies in the discretion of the court and costs should generally follow the event, but there are usually good reasons in the context of matrimonial proceedings to depart from it.
- Category: Procedural
- Related Cases:
- [2013] 2 SLR 246
- [2014] SGHC 112
- [2015] 1 SLR 496
- [2014] 1 SLR 245
- [1996] 1 SLR(R) 906
- [1997] 1 SLR(R) 336
- [2011] SGHC 138
- [2006] 4 SLR(R) 605
- [1988] 1 SLR(R) 631
- [2015] 3 SLR 973
- [1996] SGHC 206
- [2012] SGHC 213
- [2010] SGHC 148
8. Remedies Sought
- Interim Judgment of Divorce
- Costs
9. Cause of Actions
- Divorce
10. Practice Areas
- Family Law
- Divorce
- Matrimonial Litigation
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aurol Anthony Sabastian v Sembcorp Marine Ltd | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2013] 2 SLR 246 | Singapore | Cited for the broad discretion of the courts in relation to costs and the overriding concern to achieve the fairest allocation of costs. |
BMG v BMH | High Court | Yes | [2014] SGHC 112 | Singapore | Cited to support the principle that the matter of costs is within the discretion of the court. |
Maryani Sadeli v Arjun Permanand Samtani and another and other appeals | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2015] 1 SLR 496 | Singapore | Cited for the cost-shifting rule and the policy considerations which inform the indemnity principle. |
Then Khek Koon and another v Arjun Permanand Samtani and another and other suits | High Court | Yes | [2014] 1 SLR 245 | Singapore | Cited for the rationale of the indemnity principle and enhancing access to justice. |
Shi Fang v Koh Pee Huat | Court of Appeal | Yes | [1996] 1 SLR(R) 906 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the wife should be entitled to the full costs of the hearing of the divorce petition. |
Tham Khai Meng v Nam Wen Jet Bernadette | Court of Appeal | Yes | [1997] 1 SLR(R) 336 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the wife should be allowed the costs of the hearing of ancillary matters as a continuation of the hearing of the divorce petition. |
AQT v AQU | High Court | Yes | [2011] SGHC 138 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the court must be sensitive that the cost order does not run contrary to the no-fault basis that underlies jurisprudence on divorce. |
Chen Siew Hwee v Low Kee Guan (Wong Yong Yee, co-respondent) | High Court | Yes | [2006] 4 SLR(R) 605 | Singapore | Cited for the observation that the hearing of ancillary matters is a discrete set of proceedings. |
Sujatha v Prabhakaran Nair | High Court | Yes | [1988] 1 SLR(R) 631 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the court could not make an order for the costs incurred in subsequent proceedings. |
BNS v BNT | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2015] 3 SLR 973 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the court can exercise its discretion to depart from the general principle that costs should follow the event. |
Lum Cheng Yee (M W) v Lai Choon Seng | High Court | Yes | [1996] SGHC 206 | Singapore | Cited for the usual attitude of the court in ancillary matters is that each party should bear his/her own costs. |
Cheung Kam Yi Betty v Liu Tsun Kie | High Court | Yes | [2012] SGHC 213 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that in general, costs are not ordered in matrimonial matters. |
AHJ v AHK | High Court | Yes | [2010] SGHC 148 | Singapore | Cited for the view that parties should bear their own costs as is usual in proceedings of this nature. |
BNH v BNI | High Court | Yes | [2013] SGHC 283 | Singapore | Cited for the reason for ordering that parties bear their own costs is the courts’ desire to minimise acrimony and discontent between parties. |
Povey v Povey | N/A | Yes | [1971] 2 WLR 381 | N/A | Cited for the sentiment that the “event” in my judgment is not a sufficiently sensitive indicator in the family division. |
Tan Kay Poh v Tan Surida and another | N/A | Yes | [1988] 2 SLR(R) 515 | Singapore | Cited for affirming the notion of “no-fault” divorce. |
Cheng William v Chai Mei Leng | N/A | Yes | [1999] 1 SLR(R) 1093 | Singapore | Cited for affirming the notion of “no-fault” divorce. |
AQS v AQR | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2012] SGCA 3 | Singapore | Cited for affirming the notion of “no-fault” divorce. |
ALJ v ALK | High Court | Yes | [2010] SGHC 255 | Singapore | Cited as a case where no order as to costs was made for matrimonial proceedings. |
Tan Hwee Lee v Tan Cheng Guan and another appeal and another matter | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2012] 4 SLR 785 | Singapore | Cited as a case where no order as to costs was made for matrimonial proceedings. |
AYQ v AYR and another matter | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2013] 1 SLR 476 | Singapore | Cited as a case where no order as to costs was made for matrimonial proceedings. |
BCB v BCC | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2013] 2 SLR 324 | Singapore | Cited as a case where no order as to costs was made for matrimonial proceedings. |
BJS v BJT | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2013] 4 SLR 41 | Singapore | Cited as a case where no order as to costs was made for matrimonial proceedings. |
Kwee Lee Fung Ivon v Lim Gordon | High Court | Yes | [2013] SGHC 228 | Singapore | Cited as a case where no order as to costs was made for matrimonial proceedings. |
ANH v ANI | High Court | Yes | [2014] SGHC 184 | Singapore | Cited as a case where no order as to costs was made for matrimonial proceedings. |
Guo Ningqun Anthony v Chan Wing Sun | High Court | Yes | [2014] SGHC 56 | Singapore | Cited as a case where no order as to costs was made for matrimonial proceedings. |
AYM v AYL and another appeal | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2014] 4 SLR 559 | Singapore | Cited as a case where no order as to costs was made for matrimonial proceedings. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
Family Justice Rules 2014 (S 813/2014) |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Women’s Charter (Cap 353, 2009 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
Family Justice Act 2014 (Act 27 of 2014) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Costs
- Matrimonial Proceedings
- Divorce
- Interim Judgment
- Ancillary Matters
- No-Fault Divorce
- Irretrievable Breakdown
- Family Justice Rules
15.2 Keywords
- divorce
- matrimonial
- costs
- family law
- singapore
- appeal
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Costs | 95 |
Divorce | 95 |
Matrimonial Proceedings | 90 |
Family Law | 90 |
Appeal | 70 |
Matrimonial Assets | 60 |
Civil Procedure | 40 |
16. Subjects
- Family Law
- Divorce
- Costs in Legal Proceedings