Trans Eurokars v Koh Wee Meng: Taxation of Costs for Defective Rolls-Royce
Trans Eurokars Pte Ltd, the Applicant, applied to tax Bill of Costs No 247 of 2014 against Dr Koh Wee Meng, the Respondent, following the dismissal of the Respondent's claim in Suit 873 for an allegedly defective Rolls-Royce Phantom. The High Court, presided over by Justin Yeo AR, heard arguments regarding the reasonableness and proportionality of the claimed costs. The court taxed the bill, reducing the amounts claimed for Section 1 (costs) and Section 3 (disbursements), and fixed the Section 2 (costs of taxation) amount.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Bill of Costs taxed with reductions to Sections 1 and 3; Section 2 costs fixed.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Taxation of costs application following dismissal of claim for defective Rolls-Royce. The court assessed the reasonableness and proportionality of claimed costs.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trans Eurokars Pte Ltd | Applicant | Corporation | Bill of Costs Taxed | Partial | Quek Kian Teck |
Koh Wee Meng | Respondent | Individual | Costs Reduced | Partial | Samantha Tan, Tan Rui Wen |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Justin Yeo | Assistant Registrar | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Quek Kian Teck | WongPartnership LLP |
Samantha Tan | Drew & Napier LLC |
Tan Rui Wen | Drew & Napier LLC |
4. Facts
- The Respondent sued the Applicant for an allegedly defective Rolls-Royce.
- The Judge dismissed the Respondent's claims in Suit 873.
- The Judge ordered costs of Suit 873 to be awarded to the Applicant and taxed on a standard basis.
- The Applicant filed a Bill of Costs claiming $608,807.28 for Section 1 costs.
- The Respondent disputed the Bill of Costs, arguing the claimed costs were excessive.
- The Applicant's legal team included four solicitors and counsel.
- There was no certificate for more than two counsel.
5. Formal Citations
- Trans Eurokars Pte Ltd v Koh Wee Meng, Bill of Costs No 247 of 2014, [2015] SGHCR 6
- Koh Wee Meng v Trans Eurokars Pte Ltd, , [2014] 3 SLR 663
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Suit 873 commenced | |
Hearing of Registrar’s Appeal No 6 | |
Judgment dismissing Respondent’s claims | |
Clarification hearing | |
Applicant filed the Bill of Costs | |
Respondent filed a Notice of Dispute | |
Adjournment granted to Respondent | |
Substantive arguments heard | |
Further arguments heard | |
Judgment rendered |
7. Legal Issues
- Taxation of Costs
- Outcome: The court determined the appropriate amount of costs to be awarded, considering the complexity of the case, the time spent, and the principle of proportionality.
- Category: Procedural
- Sub-Issues:
- Reasonableness of costs
- Proportionality of costs
- Application of the indemnity principle
- Two counsel rule
- Related Cases:
- [2009] 4 SLR(R) 155
- [2014] 1 SLR 245
- [2011] 3 SLR 1052
- Two Counsel Rule
- Outcome: The court adopted a 'notional' approach to the two counsel rule, allowing consideration of work done by the entire legal team, but limiting the total amount claimable to what would have been reasonably incurred by a notional two-man team.
- Category: Procedural
- Sub-Issues:
- Interpretation of Order 59 Rule 19 of the Rules of Court
- Whether costs of more than two solicitors can be considered in the absence of a certificate
8. Remedies Sought
- Taxation of Costs
9. Cause of Actions
- No cause of actions
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
11. Industries
- Automotive
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ng Eng Ghee and others v Mamata Kapildev Dave and others (Horizon Partners Pte Ltd, intervener) and another appeal | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2009] 4 SLR(R) 155 | Singapore | Cited for the indemnity principle in civil litigation, where the unsuccessful party pays the successful party's reasonable litigation costs. |
Then Khek Koon and another v Arjun Permanand Samtani and another and other suits | Unknown | Yes | [2014] 1 SLR 245 | Singapore | Cited for the indemnity principle and the court's discretion in awarding costs. |
Lin Jian Wei and anor v Lim Eng Hock Peter | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2011] 3 SLR 1052 | Singapore | Cited for the approach to be taken in taxation, assessing complexity, reasonableness, and proportionality of costs. |
Koh Wee Meng v Trans Eurokars Pte Ltd | High Court | Yes | [2014] 3 SLR 663 | Singapore | The primary case for which costs are being taxed; details the underlying dispute regarding the allegedly defective Rolls-Royce. |
Basil Anthony Herman v Premier Security Co-Operative Ltd and others | Unknown | Yes | [2012] 2 SLR 616 | Singapore | Cited by the Respondent to argue that Section 1 costs should be in the range of $10,000 to $20,000 per trial day. |
Colliers International (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Senkee Logistics Pte Ltd | Unknown | Yes | [2007] 2 SLR(R) 230 | Singapore | Cited regarding the conditions for granting a certificate for more than two solicitors. |
Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd v Lim Eng Hock Peter and others (Tung Yu-Lien Margaret and others, third parties) | Unknown | Yes | [2011] 1 SLR 852 | Singapore | Cited regarding the conditions for granting a certificate for more than two solicitors. |
ST International Company Limited v General Nice Resources (Hong Kong) Ltd | District Court | Yes | ST International Company Limited v General Nice Resources (Hong Kong) Ltd DCCJ 4192 of 2007 | Hong Kong | Cited by the Applicant to support the argument that it is reasonable for a senior solicitor to supervise a junior solicitor in litigation. |
Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa | Unknown | Yes | [2008] 3 SLR(R) 189 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that disbursements must be supported by documentary evidence. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2006 Rev Ed) |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Sale of Goods Act (Cap 393, 1999 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
Companies Act (Cap 50, 2006 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
Copyright Act (Cap 63, 2006 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Taxation of costs
- Bill of costs
- Indemnity principle
- Standard basis
- Proportionality
- Reasonableness
- Two counsel rule
- Disbursements
- Section 1 costs
- Section 2 costs
- Section 3 costs
15.2 Keywords
- taxation
- costs
- Rolls-Royce
- defective
- litigation
- Singapore
- civil procedure
16. Subjects
- Civil Procedure
- Costs
- Legal Fees
17. Areas of Law
- Civil Procedure
- Taxation of Costs