Long Well Group Ltd v Commerzbank AG: Discovery of Documents & Funding Obligations in Libyan Oil Venture

Long Well Group Ltd, PT Citrabumi Sacna, Private Energy Pte Ltd, and First Power International Limited sued Commerzbank Aktiengesellschaft, Commerz Asset Management Asia Pacific Pte Ltd, Commerzbank Asset Management Asia Ltd, and Commerz Asia Best SPC in the High Court of Singapore, seeking recovery of losses from a Libyan oil and gas venture. The plaintiffs appealed against Assistant Registrar Bryan Fang's decision regarding further discovery of documents. Justice Choo Han Teck dismissed the appeal, finding the requested documents irrelevant to the plaintiffs' pleaded case concerning the defendants' alleged funding obligations.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Appeal dismissed with costs reserved to the trial judge.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Plaintiffs sought further discovery of documents to prove defendants' funding obligations in a Libyan oil venture. The court dismissed the appeal, finding the documents irrelevant to the pleaded case.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Long Well Group LimitedPlaintiff, AppellantCorporationAppeal DismissedLostChristopher De Souza, Darrell Wee Jiawei, Nandhu
PT Citrabumi SacnaPlaintiff, AppellantCorporationAppeal DismissedLostChristopher De Souza, Darrell Wee Jiawei, Nandhu
Private Energy Pte LtdPlaintiff, AppellantCorporationAppeal DismissedLostChristopher De Souza, Darrell Wee Jiawei, Nandhu
First Power International LimitedPlaintiff, AppellantCorporationAppeal DismissedLostChristopher De Souza, Darrell Wee Jiawei, Nandhu
Commerzbank AktiengesellschaftDefendant, RespondentCorporationAppeal DismissedWonKhelvin Xu Cunhan, Tao Tao
Commerz Asset Management Asia Pacific Pte LtdDefendant, RespondentCorporationAppeal DismissedWonKhelvin Xu Cunhan, Tao Tao
Commerzbank Asset Management Asia LtdDefendant, RespondentCorporationAppeal DismissedWonKhelvin Xu Cunhan, Tao Tao
Commerz Asia Best SPCDefendant, RespondentCorporationAppeal DismissedWonKhelvin Xu Cunhan, Tao Tao

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Christopher De SouzaLee & Lee
Darrell Wee JiaweiLee & Lee
NandhuLee & Lee
Khelvin Xu CunhanRajah & Tann LLP
Tao TaoRajah & Tann LLP

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiffs claimed losses in a business venture with defendants involving oil and gas drilling in Libya.
  2. Plaintiffs alleged defendants represented they would provide/raise funds for exploration and development.
  3. A fund named 'Commerz Asia Emerald' was set up by the third defendant for the venture.
  4. Emerald and Pertamina entered into a joint-operating agreement (JOA).
  5. Plaintiffs claimed defendants failed to contribute US$50m, hindering the venture.
  6. Plaintiffs sought discovery of an arbitral award between Pertamina and the fourth defendant.
  7. Plaintiffs sought discovery of letters of credit issued by the first defendant in favor of PEPL.
  8. Plaintiffs sought discovery related to a bank account opened by PEPL with the first defendant.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Long Well Group Ltd and othersvCommerzbank AG and others, Suit No 28 of 2012(HC/Registrar’s Appeal No 207 of 2016), [2016] SGHC 158

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Discussions held between plaintiffs' and defendants' representatives regarding funding for oil and gas venture in Libya.
Representations allegedly made by defendants to plaintiffs regarding funding.
Representations allegedly made by defendants to plaintiffs regarding funding.
First and second plaintiffs signed a transfer agreement to buy shares Emerald had in the joint venture.
Arbitral award issued in arbitration between Pertamina and the fourth defendant.
Suit filed (Suit 28 of 2012).
Hearing date.
Judgment reserved.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Discovery of Documents
    • Outcome: The court held that the requested documents were not relevant or necessary for the fair disposal of the case.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Relevance of documents
      • Necessity of documents
  2. Breach of Contract
    • Outcome: The court did not make a definitive ruling on breach of contract, but the relevance of the documents sought was tied to establishing a funding obligation.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Negligence
    • Outcome: The court did not make a definitive ruling on negligence, but the relevance of the documents sought was tied to establishing a funding obligation.
    • Category: Substantive
  4. Misrepresentation
    • Outcome: The court did not make a definitive ruling on misrepresentation, but the relevance of the documents sought was tied to establishing a funding obligation.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Recovery of alleged losses

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract
  • Negligence
  • Misrepresentation

10. Practice Areas

  • Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Oil and Gas
  • Finance

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
AAY v AAZHigh CourtYes[2011] 1 SLR 1093SingaporeCited for the principle that confidentiality of arbitral awards may be waived if the court considers discovery relevant and necessary for the fair disposal of the case.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Banking Act (Cap 19, 2008 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Discovery of documents
  • Funding obligation
  • Libyan concession
  • Joint-operating agreement
  • Commerz Asia Emerald
  • Pertamina
  • PEPL
  • Arbitral award
  • Letters of credit
  • Banking secrecy

15.2 Keywords

  • discovery
  • documents
  • funding
  • oil
  • gas
  • venture
  • contract
  • negligence
  • misrepresentation

16. Subjects

  • Civil Procedure
  • Contract Law
  • Banking Law

17. Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure
  • Discovery of Documents