Foo Jee Boo v Foo Jee Seng: Resulting Trusts, Sale of Land Under Court Order, and Equitable Accounting
In Foo Jee Boo v Foo Jee Seng, the High Court of Singapore addressed a dispute between two brothers, Foo Jee Boo and Foo Jee Seng, regarding the beneficial interests in a property. Foo Jee Boo sought a court order for the property's sale and apportionment of the proceeds according to their legal interests (44% and 56%, respectively). Foo Jee Seng claimed a 93.4% beneficial interest. The court determined that the beneficial interests matched the legal interests, ordering the property's sale with proceeds divided accordingly, subject to equitable accounting to reimburse Foo Jee Seng for excess mortgage payments.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court of the Republic of Singapore1.2 Outcome
Judgment for Plaintiff; Property to be sold with proceeds divided 44% to Plaintiff and 56% to Defendant, subject to equitable accounting.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
The High Court determined the beneficial interests in a property dispute between brothers, ordering its sale and apportionment of proceeds based on legal interests.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foo Jee Boo | Plaintiff | Individual | Judgment for Plaintiff | Won | Foo Jee Boo |
Foo Jee Seng | Defendant | Individual | Partial | Partial | Foo Jee Seng |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Debbie Ong | Judicial Commissioner | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Foo Jee Boo | Independent Practitioner |
Foo Jee Seng | Independent Practitioner |
4. Facts
- Plaintiff and Defendant are brothers with legal interests in the Property as tenants in common (44% and 56% respectively).
- Plaintiff sought an order for the Property to be sold and proceeds apportioned according to legal interests.
- Defendant claimed a 93.4% beneficial interest in the Property.
- The Property was purchased for $685,900 with a loan of $160,000.
- A table prepared before registration of interests showed how the 44:56 ratio was derived.
- The court found that the parties intended to acquire the property in the registered shares.
- Defendant made significantly more loan repayments than initially contemplated.
5. Formal Citations
- Foo Jee Boo v Foo Jee Seng, Originating Summons No 803 of 2015, [2016] SGHC 225
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Option to purchase initially obtained | |
Purchase of the Property was completed | |
Interests were registered | |
Loan was re-financed by Hong Leong Finance | |
Plaintiff stopped Loan repayments | |
Defendant started funding the monthly repayments | |
Originating Summons No 803 of 2015 filed | |
Hearing date | |
Hearing date | |
Hearing date and oral judgment delivered | |
Grounds of decision issued |
7. Legal Issues
- Beneficial Interest in Property
- Outcome: The court held that the beneficial interests matched the legal interests, with the Plaintiff having 44% and the Defendant 56%.
- Category: Substantive
- Related Cases:
- [2016] 3 SLR 1222
- Resulting Trust
- Outcome: The court considered the principles of resulting trust but found that the parties' intentions at the time of purchase indicated that the legal interests reflected the beneficial interests.
- Category: Substantive
- Related Cases:
- [2016] 3 SLR 1222
- Equitable Accounting
- Outcome: The court ordered equitable accounting to reimburse the Defendant for mortgage payments made in excess of his agreed share.
- Category: Remedial
- Related Cases:
- [2016] 3 SLR 1222
8. Remedies Sought
- Order for Sale of Property
- Apportionment of Sale Proceeds
- Equitable Accounting
9. Cause of Actions
- Determination of Beneficial Interest in Property
- Sale of Property
10. Practice Areas
- Property Law
- Trusts Law
- Civil Litigation
11. Industries
- Real Estate
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Su Emmanuel v Emmanuel Priya Ethel Anne | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2016] 3 SLR 1222 | Singapore | Cited for the principles on resulting trusts and how mortgage repayments should be treated in determining beneficial interests. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Beneficial Interest
- Resulting Trust
- Equitable Accounting
- Tenants in Common
- Mortgage Repayments
- Legal Interest
- Apportionment of Proceeds
- Common Understanding
15.2 Keywords
- property
- trust
- sale
- mortgage
- accounting
- beneficial interest
- legal interest
16. Subjects
- Property Law
- Trusts
- Equity
- Real Estate
- Land Dispute
17. Areas of Law
- Trusts
- Resulting Trusts
- Equity
- Remedies
- Equitable Accounting
- Land Law
- Sale of Land