Tan Shi Lin v Poh Che Thiam: Damages for Personal Injuries from Road Accident

In Tan Shi Lin v Poh Che Thiam, the Singapore High Court assessed damages payable to Tan Shi Lin, a physiotherapist, following a road accident caused by Poh Che Thiam. The defendant had already conceded liability. The court considered claims for pain and suffering, loss of earning capacity, loss of future earnings, and special damages, ultimately awarding Tan Shi Lin a total of $483,626.90, plus interest and costs.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for Plaintiff

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Singapore High Court assesses damages for a physiotherapist injured in a road accident, including pain and suffering, loss of earnings, and future medical expenses.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Tan Shi LinPlaintiffIndividualJudgment for PlaintiffWon
Poh Che ThiamDefendantIndividualJudgment against DefendantLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Lai Siu ChiuSenior JudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The plaintiff, a 32-year-old physiotherapist, was involved in a road accident on 26 December 2012.
  2. The defendant's bus slammed into the left side of the plaintiff’s motorcycle.
  3. The plaintiff sustained near amputation of the left big toe and open dislocation of the left second toe.
  4. The plaintiff underwent multiple surgeries, including amputation of the left big toe and disarticulation of the second toe.
  5. The plaintiff was hospitalised twice, spending a total of 42 days in the hospital.
  6. The plaintiff suffered chronic pain, compensatory pain, and decreased range of motion.
  7. The defendant consented to interlocutory judgment being entered against him on the basis he was 100% liable for the accident.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Tan Shi Lin v Poh Che Thiam, Suit No 109 of 2014, [2017] SGHC 219

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Road accident occurred
Plaintiff discharged from hospital after first stay
Plaintiff's second stay in hospital
Plaintiff discharged from hospital after second stay
Plaintiff suffered from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
Plaintiff commenced further studies
Plaintiff commenced suit
Plaintiff obtained a first class honours degree in physiotherapy
Plaintiff completed further studies
Plaintiff resumed full-time employment
Defendant consented to interlocutory judgment
Original date fixed for assessment hearing
Plaintiff requested to convert to part-time employment
Plaintiff converted to part-time employment
Trial began
Trial concluded
Judgment reserved
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Quantum of Damages
    • Outcome: The court determined the quantum of damages due and payable to the plaintiff arising from the injuries she sustained in the accident.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Loss of Earning Capacity
    • Outcome: The court did not award the plaintiff the amount she claimed for loss of earning capacity.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Loss of Future Earnings
    • Outcome: The court awarded the plaintiff $192,000 for loss of future earnings.
    • Category: Substantive
  4. Pain and Suffering
    • Outcome: The court awarded the plaintiff damages for pain and suffering, considering various injuries including degloving injury, amputations, chronic pain, and PTSD.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Negligence

10. Practice Areas

  • Personal Injury Litigation

11. Industries

  • Healthcare
  • Transportation

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Ng Chee Wee v Tan Chin SengHigh CourtYes[2013] SGHC 54SingaporeCited for the appropriate award for pain and suffering and loss of amenities for a degloving injury to the foot.
Zailani bin Putra Ali v Low Keng Huat Construction Company (S) Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[1993] SGHC 277SingaporeCited by the defendant to argue that the plaintiff's injuries were less severe than those of the plaintiff in this case.
Lee Wei Kong (by his litigation representative Lee Swee Chit) v Ng Siok TongCourt of AppealYes[2012] 2 SLR 85SingaporeCited by the defendant to argue that the plaintiff did not suffer injuries that were comparable to those of the plaintiff in this case.
Mei Yue Lan Margaret v Raffles City (Pte) LtdHigh CourtYes[2005] SGHC 168SingaporeCited for the award for pain and suffering for a plaintiff who had to undergo numerous operations and treatment which included the implant of a spinal cord stimulator to control the pain.
Tan Yong Heng Jeffrey v Tay Kiah PorHigh CourtYes[2003] SGHC 278SingaporeCited for the award for potential osteoarthritis in the plaintiff's left metatarsal and left ankle.
Visvalingam s/o Arumugam v Toh Gim ChooHigh CourtYes[1998] 1 SLR (R) 314SingaporeCited for the award for the early onset of osteoarthritis on the left knee joint.
Aw Ang Moh v OCWS Logistics Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[1998] SGHC 167SingaporeCited by the defendant to argue that a sum of $5,000 for the scars would be appropriate.
Chai Kang Wei Samuel v Shaw Linda GillianCourt of AppealYes[2010] 3 SLR 587SingaporeCited for the proposition that an award for loss of earning capacity can be awarded if there is a substantial or real risk that the plaintiff could lose his or her present job at some time before the estimated end of his or her working life.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Retirement and Re-employment Act (Cap 274A, 2012 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Degloving injury
  • Amputation
  • Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
  • Loss of earning capacity
  • Loss of future earnings
  • Pain and suffering
  • Physiotherapist
  • Interlocutory judgment

15.2 Keywords

  • personal injury
  • road accident
  • damages
  • physiotherapist
  • loss of earnings
  • pain and suffering
  • singapore

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Personal Injury
  • Damages Assessment
  • Road Accident