Law Beng Chong Gary v The Wellness Group Pte Ltd: Contractual Terms & Termination Agreement

In Law Beng Chong Gary v The Wellness Group Pte Ltd, the High Court of Singapore, on 17 October 2017, dismissed the plaintiff's action. The court construed a termination agreement and determined that the 2007 Employment Letter had been terminated, and that the parties had been discharged and released from the obligations contained therein. The plaintiff's claim was based on the 2007 Employment Letter. The plaintiff has filed an appeal against the decision.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Plaintiff's action dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The court construed a termination agreement, determining that a prior employment letter was terminated, dismissing the plaintiff's action. The plaintiff's appeal was filed.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
The Wellness Group Pte LtdDefendantCorporationJudgment for DefendantWon
Law Beng Chong GaryPlaintiffIndividualAction DismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Hoo Sheau PengJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiff was the Chief Operating Officer of the defendant from 2007 to 2011.
  2. The 2007 Employment Letter included a stock option scheme for the plaintiff.
  3. Plaintiff's employment was transferred to TWG Tea in 2008, with the 2007 Employment Letter terms continuing to apply.
  4. In 2011, the plaintiff, defendant, and TWG Tea signed a Termination Agreement.
  5. The Termination Agreement included a profit-sharing scheme for the plaintiff at TWG Tea.
  6. TWG Tea later decided to replace the profit-sharing scheme with a new incentive scheme.
  7. Plaintiff claimed entitlement to shares under the stock option scheme in the 2007 Employment Letter.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Law Beng Chong Gary v The Wellness Group Pte Ltd, Suit No 221 of 2017(Summons No 2331 of 2017), [2017] SGHC 254

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Employment letter between the parties signed
Plaintiff became Chief Operating Officer of the defendant
Plaintiff's employment transferred to TWG Tea
Termination Agreement signed
New letter of employment issued to plaintiff by TWG Tea
First instalment of ex gratia payment made
Final instalment of ex gratia payment made
TWG Tea proposed new incentive scheme
TWG Tea informed plaintiff of decision to lapse profit sharing scheme
Hearing date
Judgment date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Construction of Contractual Terms
    • Outcome: The court construed the termination agreement to mean that the 2007 Employment Letter was terminated and the parties were discharged from their obligations.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Interpretation of termination clauses
      • Obligations under termination agreements
      • Continuing obligations
    • Related Cases:
      • [2012] 1 SLR 447

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Shares in the defendant company

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Food and Beverage

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Ang Tin Yong v Ang Boon Chye and anotherHigh CourtYes[2012] 1 SLR 447SingaporeCited for the principles of contractual construction, including ascertaining the intentions of the parties, taking an objective approach, and considering the commercial purpose of the transaction.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
O 14 r 12 of the Rules of Court

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Rules of Court (Cap 322, R5, 2014 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Termination Agreement
  • 2007 Employment Letter
  • Stock option scheme
  • Profit sharing scheme
  • Ex gratia payment
  • Corporate Gross Turnover Sales

15.2 Keywords

  • contract
  • termination
  • employment
  • stock options
  • profit sharing

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Contractual Interpretation
  • Employment Contract
  • Termination of Contract