TYS v TYT: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Wife/Child Maintenance

In the divorce case of *TYS v TYT*, the Family Justice Courts of Singapore heard ancillary matters concerning the division of matrimonial assets and maintenance for the wife and child. The court, presided over by Valerie Thean JC, ordered the transfer of the Balmoral condominium to the wife, with the husband bearing the costs. The court also set monthly maintenance payments for the son and wife. The husband appealed against the orders on asset division and maintenance for the wife and son. The orders made as to custody, care and control and access for the son are not the subject of appeal.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Family Justice Courts of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Orders made regarding asset division and maintenance for the wife and son.

1.3 Case Type

Family

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Divorce case concerning division of matrimonial assets and maintenance for wife and child. The court ordered transfer of the Balmoral condominium to the wife.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
TYSPlaintiffIndividualOrders made regarding asset division and maintenanceNeutral
TYTDefendantIndividualOrders made regarding asset division and maintenanceNeutral

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Valerie TheanJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The parties married on 30 January 1996 and have a son who is on the autism spectrum.
  2. The Husband worked as a corporate banker and later as CEO of [A] Inc in the US.
  3. The Wife worked as a flight stewardess until 2004 and then became a housewife.
  4. The Husband filed for divorce in Singapore on 26 December 2012 based on four years of separation.
  5. The Wife claimed the Husband failed to account for significant sums of money.
  6. The Husband claimed the Wife failed to account for withdrawals from her bank accounts.
  7. The Balmoral condominium was a key asset in dispute.

5. Formal Citations

  1. TYS v TYT, Divorce Transfer No 6222 of 2012, [2017] SGHCF 7

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Parties married
Wife stopped working as a flight stewardess
Parties began living separately
Husband relocated to the US
Husband filed for divorce
Interim judgment granted
Oral judgment given on ancillary matters

7. Legal Issues

  1. Division of Matrimonial Assets
    • Outcome: The court determined the pool of matrimonial assets and ordered the transfer of the Balmoral condominium to the Wife.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2015] 4 SLR 1043
  2. Maintenance for Wife
    • Outcome: The court ordered the Husband to pay the Wife monthly maintenance of $4,000.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Maintenance for Child
    • Outcome: The court ordered the Husband to pay the Wife $2,000 per month for the son's maintenance.
    • Category: Substantive
  4. Adverse Inference
    • Outcome: The court drew an adverse inference against the Husband due to unexplained expenditure and non-disclosure of assets.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Related Cases:
      • [2007] SGCA 21
      • [2015] 2 SLR 195
      • [2012] 3 SLR 402

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Division of Matrimonial Assets
  2. Maintenance for Wife
  3. Maintenance for Child

9. Cause of Actions

  • Divorce
  • Division of Matrimonial Assets
  • Maintenance

10. Practice Areas

  • Divorce
  • Family Law
  • Asset Division
  • Child Custody
  • Maintenance

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
ARY v ARXCourt of AppealYes[2016] 2 SLR 686SingaporeCited for guidance on selecting the appropriate operative date for determining matrimonial assets.
Koh Bee Choo v Choo Chai HuahCourt of AppealYes[2007] SGCA 21SingaporeCited for the requirements to draw an adverse inference.
Chan Tin Sun v Fong Quay SimCourt of AppealYes[2015] 2 SLR 195SingaporeCited for the requirements to draw an adverse inference.
Chan Yuen Boey v Sia Hee SoonCourt of AppealYes[2012] 3 SLR 402SingaporeCited for the means by which an adverse inference may be given effect.
AZZ v BAAHigh CourtYes[2016] SGHC 44SingaporeCited regarding adverse inferences.
ANJ v ANKCourt of AppealYes[2015] 4 SLR 1043SingaporeCited for the structured approach to work out a just and equitable division of matrimonial assets.
Twiss, Christopher James Hans v Twiss, Yvonne PrendergastCourt of AppealYes[2015] SGCA 52SingaporeCited for the structured approach to work out a just and equitable division of matrimonial assets.
NK v NLCourt of AppealYes[2007] 3 SLR 743SingaporeCited for the approach to make a “rough and ready approximation” based on the evidence before it.
AVM v AWHHigh CourtYes[2015] SGHC 194SingaporeCited for the relevance of in-vitro fertilization treatment to indirect contribution.
Au Kin Chung v Ho Kit JooHigh CourtYes[2007] SGHC 150SingaporeCited for the uplift approach to address the adverse inference.
Chan Pui Yin v Lim Tiong KeiCourt of AppealYes[2011] 4 SLR 875SingaporeCited for the uplift approach to address the adverse inference.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Women’s Charter (Cap 353, 2009 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Matrimonial Assets
  • Interim Judgment Date
  • Adverse Inference
  • Direct Contribution
  • Indirect Contribution
  • Balmoral Condominium
  • Maintenance
  • Autism Spectrum
  • Uplift Approach

15.2 Keywords

  • divorce
  • matrimonial assets
  • maintenance
  • child
  • wife
  • Singapore
  • family law

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Matrimonial Assets
  • Maintenance