Chan Lung Kien v Chan Shwe Ching: Severance of Joint Tenancy by Unilateral Declaration

In Chan Lung Kien v Chan Shwe Ching, the Court of Appeal of Singapore addressed whether a joint tenant can unilaterally sever a joint tenancy by declaration and how severance is implemented under the Land Titles Act. Chan Lung Kien appealed against the High Court's decision that his writ of seizure and sale was ineffective because the joint tenancy was not severed by a Severance Notice. The court dismissed the appeal, holding that the joint tenancy was not severed because the instrument of declaration was not registered, and Mdm Leong's share of the sale proceeds must be paid to her estate in bankruptcy.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The Court of Appeal held that a joint tenancy cannot be unilaterally severed by a declaration of intention without registration under the Land Titles Act.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Chan Lung KienAppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLost
Chan Shwe ChingRespondentIndividualAppeal DismissedNeutral
Leong Lai YeeOtherIndividual
Lim Eng SoonOtherIndividual

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Sundaresh MenonChief JusticeNo
Andrew Phang Boon LeongJudge of AppealNo
Judith PrakashJudge of AppealYes
Tay Yong KwangJudge of AppealNo
Steven ChongJudge of AppealNo

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Mdm Leong and Mr Lim were registered as joint tenants of the Property.
  2. Two separate actions were commenced against Mdm Leong by Ms Chan Shwe Chiang and Mr Chan Lung Kien.
  3. The respondent obtained a summary judgment against Mdm Leong for approximately $1.4m plus interest and costs.
  4. The appellant entered judgment against Mdm Leong in default of appearance for in excess of $8.4m plus interest and costs.
  5. Mr Lim executed an instrument of declaration to sever the joint tenancy and served a Severance Notice.
  6. The instrument of declaration was not registered.
  7. Mdm Leong was made a bankrupt.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Chan Lung Kien v Chan Shwe Ching, Civil Appeal No 141 of 2017, [2018] SGCA 24

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Action commenced by Ms Chan Shwe Chiang against Mdm Leong Lai Yee
Action commenced by Mr Chan Lung Kien against Mdm Leong Lai Yee
Appellant and respondent succeeded in their respective claims against Mdm Leong
Mr Lim executed an instrument of declaration to sever the joint tenancy
Respondent obtained an order for Mdm Leong’s interest in the Property to be attached
Writ of seizure and sale was registered with the Singapore Land Authority
Severance Notice appeared in the Straits Times
Appellant obtained a writ of seizure and sale against the Property
Appellant's writ was registered with the Singapore Land Authority
Mortgagee’s sale was completed
Mdm Leong was made a bankrupt
Originating summons filed by the appellant
Judge questioned the status of the appellant’s WSS at the hearing
High Court Judge issued judgment identified as Chan Lung Kien v Chan Shwe Ching [2017] SGHC 136
Judgment reserved
Judgment delivered

7. Legal Issues

  1. Severance of Joint Tenancy
    • Outcome: The court held that a joint tenancy cannot be unilaterally severed by a declaration of intention without registration under the Land Titles Act.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Unilateral declaration of intention to sever
      • Statutory mode of severance
      • Registration requirements
  2. Effectiveness of Writ of Seizure and Sale
    • Outcome: The court declined to opine on the issue of whether a joint tenant's interest can be attached under a writ of seizure and sale prior to severance, as it was not properly before the court.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Attachment of joint tenant's interest
      • Priority of writs

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Declaration that the respondent’s WSS order was void and/or unenforceable
  2. Payment of $623,341.50 to the appellant
  3. Division of $623,341.50 between the appellant and the respondent

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Real Estate Law
  • Civil Litigation

11. Industries

  • Real Estate

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Malayan Banking Bhd v Focal Finance LtdHigh CourtYes[1998] 3 SLR(R) 1008SingaporeUpheld as good law regarding the ineffectiveness of a writ of seizure and sale to sever a joint tenancy.
Chan Lung Kien v Chan Shwe ChingHigh CourtYes[2017] SGHC 136SingaporeThe Court of Appeal overturned the High Court's holding that the Severance Notice did not sever the joint tenancy.
Diaz Priscilla v Diaz AngelaCourt of AppealYes[1997] 3 SLR(R) 759SingaporeOverruled regarding the doctrine of severance inter partes pursuant to section 53(5) of the Land Titles Act.
Sivakolunthu Kumarasamy v Shanmugam Nagaiah and anotherCourt of AppealYes[1987] SLR(R) 702SingaporeAffirmed as stating the law in Singapore that a unilateral declaration of intention to sever a joint tenancy does not sever it into a tenancy in common.
Williams v HensmanCourt of ChanceryYes(1861) 70 ER 862EnglandCited for the classic dicta on the three ways a joint-tenancy may be severed.
Tan Chew Hoe Neo v Chee Swee Cheng and othersPrivy CouncilYes(1929) 1 MLJ 643SingaporeApplied Williams v Hensman regarding severance of joint tenancy.
Jack Chia-MPH Ltd v Malayan Credit LtdCourt of AppealYes[1983–1984] SLR(R) 420SingaporeApplied Williams v Hensman regarding severance of joint tenancy.
Shanmugam Nagaiah and another v Sivakolunthu Kumarasamy (Trustees of Ramakrishna Mission Boys’ Home, interested party)High CourtYes[1985–1986] SLR(R) 408SingaporeDiscussed the High Court decision in Sivakolunthu Kumarasamy v Shanmugam Nagaiah and another.
Burgess v RawnsleyEnglish Court of AppealYes[1975] 3 All ER 142EnglandDiscussed regarding severance by unilateral declaration.
Harris v GoddardEnglish Court of AppealYes[1983] 1 WLR 1203EnglandDiscussed regarding severance by unilateral declaration.
Hawkesley v MayHigh CourtYes[1956] 1 QB 304EnglandDiscussed regarding severance by unilateral declaration.
In re Draper’s ConveyanceHigh CourtYes[1969] Ch 486EnglandDiscussed regarding severance by unilateral declaration.
Partejche v PowletCourt of ChanceryYes(1740) 4 West T Hard 788EnglandDiscussed regarding severance by unilateral declaration.
In re WilksHigh CourtYes(1891) 3 Ch 59EnglandDiscussed regarding severance by unilateral declaration.
Nielson-Jones v Fedden and othersHigh CourtYes[1974] 3 WLR 583EnglandDiscussed regarding severance by unilateral declaration.
Ng Kim Chwee (executor and trustee of the estate of Ng Ham Chau, deceased) v Chua Chiew Hai and othersHigh CourtYes[1998] 2 SLR(R) 111SingaporeDiscussed regarding severance of joint tenancy in unregistered land.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
Orders 46 and 47 of the Rules of Court

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Land Titles Act (Cap 157, 2004 Rev Ed)Singapore
Land Titles Act s 132Singapore
Land Titles Act s 45(1)Singapore
Land Titles Act s 115(3)Singapore
Land Titles Act s 53(8)Singapore
Land Titles Act s 60A(4)(b)Singapore
Land Titles Act s 60A(2)Singapore
Bankruptcy Act (Cap 20) Sections 105 and 106Singapore
Conveyancing and Law of Property Act (Cap 61, 1994 Rev Ed)Singapore
Conveyancing and Law of Property Act ss 66A(3) and (4)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Joint tenancy
  • Severance
  • Unilateral declaration
  • Instrument of declaration
  • Writ of seizure and sale
  • Land Titles Act
  • Tenancy in common
  • Registration
  • Severance Notice
  • Land-register

15.2 Keywords

  • Joint tenancy
  • Severance
  • Land Titles Act
  • Singapore
  • Property
  • Real estate
  • Writ of seizure and sale

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Land Law
  • Property Law
  • Civil Procedure
  • Bankruptcy Law