Chua Jian Construction v Zhao Xiaojuan: Work Injury Compensation for Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Chua Jian Construction and China Taiping Insurance (Singapore) Pte Ltd appealed against the decision of the Assistant Commissioner of Labour regarding compensation for Zhao Xiaojuan, as deputy for Qian Guo Liang, under the Work Injury Compensation Act. The High Court, presided over by Choo Han Teck J, allowed the appeal, finding no evidence that Qian Guo Liang's intracerebral hemorrhage was caused by his employment.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court of Singapore1.2 Outcome
Appeal Allowed
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Appeal regarding work injury compensation for Qian Guo Liang, who suffered an intracerebral hemorrhage at work. The court allowed the appeal, finding no evidence linking the injury to his employment.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
China Taiping Insurance (Singapore) Pte Ltd | Applicant | Corporation | Appeal Allowed | Won | |
Chua Jian Construction | Applicant | Corporation | Appeal Allowed | Won | |
Zhao Xiaojuan | Respondent | Individual | Appeal Dismissed | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Choo Han Teck | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- Qian Guo Liang was employed by Chua Jian Construction as a manual worker.
- On 19 October 2013, QGL was found unconscious at the construction site.
- QGL was diagnosed with an intracerebral haemorrhage.
- Zhao Xiaojuan, QGL's wife, initially filed a claim without being a properly appointed deputy.
- Zhao was subsequently appointed QGL’s deputy on 28 July 2015.
- The second Notice of Assessment was filed 33 months after the incident.
- Medical evidence indicated that QGL suffered from untreated hypertension.
5. Formal Citations
- Chua Jian Construction and another v Zhao Xiaojuan (deputy for Qian Guo Liang), HC/Tribunal Appeal No 18 of 2017, [2018] SGHC 98
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Qian Guo Liang born | |
Qian Guo Liang married Zhao Xiaojuan | |
Zhao Xiaojuan gave birth to their daughter | |
Qian Guo Liang came to work in Singapore | |
Qian Guo Liang found unconscious at work | |
Chua Jian Construction filed an incident report | |
Notice of Assessment issued | |
Zhao Xiaojuan appointed QGL’s deputy | |
Objections heard, adjourned | |
Objections dismissed | |
Objections heard by the Assistant Commissioner of Labour | |
Objections heard by the Assistant Commissioner of Labour | |
Assistant Commissioner for Labour made a decision | |
Judgment reserved | |
Judgment issued |
7. Legal Issues
- Work Injury Compensation
- Outcome: The court allowed the appeal, finding no evidence that the employee's intracerebral hemorrhage was caused by his employment.
- Category: Substantive
- Related Cases:
- [2016] 3 SLR 598
- [2006] 4 SLR(R) 507
- Validity of Claim under Work Injury Compensation Act
- Outcome: The court found that the delay in filing the claim was reasonable and understandable, and the Assistant Commissioner of Labour was not wrong to proceed with the second assessment.
- Category: Procedural
- Related Cases:
- [2016] 3 SLR 598
8. Remedies Sought
- Compensation under the Work Injury Compensation Act
9. Cause of Actions
- Work Injury Compensation Claim
10. Practice Areas
- Personal Injury
- Workplace Accidents
11. Industries
- Construction
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGB Starkstrom Pte Ltd v Commissioner of Labour | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2016] 3 SLR 598 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that only a properly appointed deputy may commence a claim on behalf of a mentally incapacitated workman. |
NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Ltd and another v Next of kin of Narayasamy s/o Ramasamy, deceased | N/A | Yes | [2006] 4 SLR(R) 507 | Singapore | Cited regarding compensation under the WICA for an employee who died at his workplace due to ischaemic heart disease; distinguished because in the present case there was no evidence that something transpired in the course of work which made the injury occur when it did. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
Order 55, Rule 1 of the Rules of Court (Cap 322, Rule 5) |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Work Injury Compensation Act (Cap 354) | Singapore |
Section 11(4) of the WICA | Singapore |
Section 3(1) of the WICA | Singapore |
subsection (3) of s 3 of the WICA | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Intracerebral haemorrhage
- Work Injury Compensation Act
- Deputy
- Incident report
- Notice of Assessment
- Course of employment
- Hypertension
15.2 Keywords
- Work Injury Compensation
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage
- Employment Law
- Singapore
- Construction
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Work Injury Compensation | 95 |
Employment Law | 70 |
Personal Injury | 30 |
16. Subjects
- Employment Law
- Work Injury Compensation