Rockwills Trustee Ltd v Wong Meng Hang: Medical Negligence, Liposuction Death & Loss of Inheritance Claim

In Rockwills Trustee Ltd v Wong Meng Hang, the High Court of Singapore addressed the taxation of costs following a medical negligence suit (Suit 165/2011) brought by Rockwills Trustee Ltd, as administrators of the estate of Franklin Heng Ang Tee, against Wong Meng Hang, Zhu Xiu Chuan, and Reves Clinic Pte Ltd. The suit arose from a liposuction procedure that resulted in Heng's death. After the respondents conceded liability, the court assessed damages, initially awarding $5,323,253.58, later reduced to $3,293,652.50 on appeal. The court taxed the Bill of Costs, addressing disputes over Section 1 (costs), Section 2 (costs), and Section 3 (disbursements), reducing the claimed amounts based on considerations of complexity, novelty, and proportionality.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Bill of Costs taxed.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Medical negligence suit for liposuction death. Court assessed costs after damages awarded for loss of inheritance claim under Civil Law Act.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Rockwills Trustee LtdApplicantCorporationBill of Costs taxedPartialKuah Boon Theng, Chain Xiao Jing Felicia
Wong Meng HangRespondentIndividualPartialPartialMelvin See Hsien Huei
Zhu Xiu Chuan @ Myint Myint KyiRespondentIndividualPartialPartialEdward Leong
Reves Clinic Pte LtdRespondentCorporationPartialPartial

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
James Elisha LeeAssistant RegistrarYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Kuah Boon ThengLegal Clinic LLC
Chain Xiao Jing FeliciaLegal Clinic LLC
Melvin See Hsien HueiDentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP
Edward LeongMyintSoe & Selvaraj

4. Facts

  1. Rockwills Trustee Ltd sued as administrators of the estate of Franklin Heng Ang Tee.
  2. The suit was against Wong Meng Hang, Zhu Xiu Chuan, and Reves Clinic Pte Ltd for medical negligence.
  3. The negligence related to a liposuction procedure resulting in Heng's death.
  4. Default judgment was entered against Reves Clinic.
  5. Interlocutory judgment was entered against the Respondents after they conceded liability.
  6. The judge awarded damages amounting to $5,323,253.58 in favor of the Applicant.
  7. On appeal, the amount of damages was reduced to $3,293,652.50.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Rockwills Trustee Ltd v Wong Meng Hang, Bill of Costs No 157 of 2018, [2018] SGHCR 16

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Default judgment entered against Reves Clinic
Interlocutory judgment entered against the Respondents
Judgment awarding damages of $5,323,253.58
Damages reduced to $3,293,652.50 by Court of Appeal
Court directed costs to be taxed on the standard basis
Applicant filed the Bill of Costs
Respondents filed Notice of Dispute
Respondents filed Notice of Dispute
Substantive arguments heard
Further arguments heard; decision reserved
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Taxation of Costs
    • Outcome: The court determined the appropriate amounts for Section 1, Section 2, and Section 3 costs, reducing some of the claimed amounts.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Reasonableness of legal fees
      • Proportionality of costs
      • Necessity of expenses
    • Related Cases:
      • [2011] 3 SLR 1052
      • [2006] 1 SLR(R) 182
  2. Expert Witness Fees
    • Outcome: The court found the expert fees somewhat excessive and taxed off 20% of the claimed amount.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Reasonableness of expert fees
      • Sufficiency of breakdown of fees
    • Related Cases:
      • [2015] SGHCR 6

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Medical Negligence

10. Practice Areas

  • Litigation
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Civil Litigation

11. Industries

  • Healthcare

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Lin Jian Wei and another v Lim Eng Hock PeterCourt of AppealYes[2011] 3 SLR 1052SingaporeCited for the approach to be adopted in taxation proceedings, emphasizing the assessment of complexity, reasonableness, and proportionality of costs.
Shorvon Simon v Singapore Medical CouncilCourt of AppealYes[2006] 1 SLR(R) 182SingaporeCited for the principle that the court should ascertain the amount of costs allowed for similar cases and justify any departure from the norm.
Lim Jun Xi Kaydon (BC NO T0830997Z), A Person Under Disability Suing By His Litigation Representative v Dr Koh Gim Hwee & AnorN/AYesS 1066/2009SingaporeCited as a precedent taxation case for medical negligence, involving injury suffered by a baby during delivery.
Zainab Bte Muhammad, A Person Under Disability, Suing by Her Litigation Representative Azizah D/O Mangarath Mohamed v National HealthCare Group Pte Ltd Trading As Alexandra Hospital & 4 OrsN/AYesS 433/2006SingaporeCited as a precedent taxation case for medical negligence, involving alleged negligence in tracheostomy care.
Trans Eurokars Pte Ltd v Koh Wee MengN/AYes[2015] SGHCR 6SingaporeCited for the principle that expert fees can be found excessive and taxed off.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Civil Law Act, Chapter 43Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Taxation of costs
  • Bill of costs
  • Medical negligence
  • Liposuction
  • Assessment of damages
  • Expert fees
  • Loss of inheritance claim
  • Interlocutory judgment
  • Default judgment

15.2 Keywords

  • medical negligence
  • liposuction
  • death
  • costs
  • taxation
  • damages
  • Singapore
  • Civil Law Act
  • expert fees
  • loss of inheritance

16. Subjects

  • Civil Procedure
  • Medical Law
  • Personal Injury

17. Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure
  • Costs
  • Taxation
  • Medical Negligence