BZZ v Comptroller of Income Tax: Capital Allowance & Income Tax Act Interpretation

In BZZ v Comptroller of Income Tax, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal by BZZ against the decision of the Income Tax Board of Review regarding a balancing charge levied by the Comptroller of Income Tax. The charge arose from the sale of a property by BZZ to BMT, as trustee of FCOT. BZZ argued that Section 24(1) of the Income Tax Act should nullify the balancing charge because the sale was not a true commercial sale due to FCL's control over both the seller and the buyer. The court dismissed the appeal, holding that FCL's influence over FCOT did not constitute control over BMT, the buyer, as required by Section 24(1) of the Income Tax Act.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Appeal dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Tax

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The High Court dismissed BZZ's appeal, affirming the Comptroller's balancing charge on the sale of property. The court held that Section 24(1) of the Income Tax Act did not apply.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Comptroller of Income TaxRespondentGovernment AgencyJudgment for RespondentWon
Pang Mei Yu of Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Law Division)
Quek Hui Ling of Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Law Division)
Desiree Sim Wei Yen of Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Law Division)
BZZAppellantCorporationAppeal dismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Pang Mei YuInland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Law Division)
Quek Hui LingInland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Law Division)
Desiree Sim Wei YenInland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Law Division)
Ong Sim HoDrew & Napier LLC
Keith Brendan Lam Xun-YuDrew & Napier LLC
Emma Gan Xin CiDrew & Napier LLC

4. Facts

  1. BZZ sold property AT to BMT, acting as trustee of FCOT.
  2. FCAM manages FCOT and is 100% owned by FCL, as is BZZ.
  3. The Comptroller levied a balancing charge of $40,476,347 against BZZ.
  4. BZZ disputed the balancing charge, claiming s 24(1) of the Income Tax Act applied.
  5. FCL owns the appellant and the Manager, and has a 22.2% stake in FCOT.
  6. The Trust Deed requires BMT to exercise its powers as directed by the Manager.
  7. FCOT's accounts are consolidated with those of FCL.

5. Formal Citations

  1. BZZ v Comptroller of Income Tax, Tax Appeal No 8 of 2019, [2019] SGHC 252

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Assessment raised for the Year of Assessment 2010
Appeal dismissed by the Income Tax Board of Review
Hearing date
Judgment reserved
Judgment date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Applicability of Section 24(1) of the Income Tax Act
    • Outcome: The court held that Section 24(1) of the Income Tax Act did not apply because FCL's influence over FCOT did not constitute control over BMT, the buyer.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Nullification of balancing charge

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Taxation
  • Tax Appeals

11. Industries

  • Real Estate
  • Finance

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Armitage v NurseHigh CourtYes[1998] Ch 241England and WalesCited regarding the irreducible core of duties of a trustee, but found not applicable in defining control under s 24(1) of the Income Tax Act.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Income Tax Act (Cap 134, 2008 Rev Ed)Singapore
Income Tax Act (Cap 134, 2008 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Balancing charge
  • Capital allowance
  • Income Tax Act
  • Control
  • Trustee
  • Beneficiary
  • Real estate investment trust
  • Tax written-down value

15.2 Keywords

  • Income Tax
  • Capital Allowance
  • Balancing Charge
  • Singapore
  • Property Sale
  • Control
  • Trust
  • FCL
  • FCOT
  • BZZ
  • Comptroller of Income Tax

17. Areas of Law

Area NameRelevance Score
Revenue Law95
Income taxation95
Capital allowance95

16. Subjects

  • Taxation
  • Corporate Law