HSBC vs Chief Assessor: Property Tax Assessment of Plaza Singapura's Annual Value

In HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) Limited (as Trustee of Capitaland Mall Trust) v The Chief Assessor, the Court of Appeal of Singapore dismissed the appeal by HSBC against the High Court's decision, which affirmed the Chief Assessor's 2008 assessment of the annual value of the subject property, the seventh floor of Plaza Singapura. The court held that the annual value should include the value of the fixtures installed by the tenant, Golden Village Multiplex Pte Ltd, and rejected the argument that the fixtures should be excluded because the tenant was obliged to remove them at the end of the lease.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Tax

1.4 Judgment Type

Ex Tempore Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The Court of Appeal upheld the Chief Assessor's property tax assessment of Plaza Singapura, ruling that tenant-installed fixtures should be included in the annual value.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
The Chief AssessorRespondentGovernment AgencyAppeal DismissedWon
Pang Mei Yu of Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore
Quek Hui Ling of Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore
Lau Sze Leng Serene of Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore
HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) Limited (as Trustee of Capitaland Mall Trust)Appellant, ApplicantTrustAppeal DismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Andrew Phang Boon LeongJudge of AppealYes
Tay Yong KwangJudge of AppealNo
Belinda Ang Saw EanJudgeNo

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Pang Mei YuInland Revenue Authority of Singapore
Quek Hui LingInland Revenue Authority of Singapore
Lau Sze Leng SereneInland Revenue Authority of Singapore
Ong Sim HoDrew & Napier LLC
Keith Brendan Lam Xun-YuDrew & Napier LLC
Gan Xin Ci EmmaDrew & Napier LLC

4. Facts

  1. HSBC is the trustee of CapitaLand Mall Trust, which owns Plaza Singapura.
  2. The subject property is the seventh floor of Plaza Singapura.
  3. The property has been leased to Golden Village Multiplex Pte Ltd since 1999.
  4. GV spent over $7.8m on fitting-out works, including air-conditioning and cinema equipment.
  5. The Chief Assessor determined the annual value of the property to be $3,292,000 in 2008.
  6. The tenancy agreement provides that the tenant is to pay the landlord any increase in property tax.
  7. The fitting-out works were only 9 years old as of 2008.

5. Formal Citations

  1. HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) Ltd (trustee of Capitaland Mall Trust)vChief Assessor, Civil Appeal No 227 of 2018, [2020] SGCA 10

6. Timeline

DateEvent
CapitaLand Mall Trust acquired Plaza Singapura
Property leased to Golden Village Multiplex Pte Ltd as a bare shell
Chief Assessor determined the annual value of the Property
Decision delivered on Valuation Review Board Appeal No 321 of 2010
Tribunal Appeal No 9 of 2018
Civil Appeal No 227 of 2018
Judgment delivered
Tenancy agreement signed

7. Legal Issues

  1. Annual Value Assessment
    • Outcome: The court held that tenant-installed fixtures should be included in the annual value assessment.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Inclusion of tenant's fixtures in annual value
      • Application of rebus sic stantibus principle
    • Related Cases:
      • [2012] 3 SLR 933
      • [2006] 4 SLR(R) 521
      • [2006] 1 SLR(R) 888
      • [2013] 2 SLR 173
  2. Fixtures vs Chattels
    • Outcome: The court determined that the fitting-out works were fixtures.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. No remedies sought

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Taxation
  • Property Assessment

11. Industries

  • Real Estate
  • Entertainment

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Chief Assessor v HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) LimitedSingapore High CourtYes[2012] 3 SLR 933SingaporeCited regarding the statutory exception in s 2(2) of the Property Tax Act.
Aspinden Holdings Ltd v Chief Assessor and anotherCourt of AppealYes[2006] 4 SLR(R) 521SingaporeCited for the rebus sic stantibus principle of valuation.
Leivest International Pte Ltd v Top Ten Entertainment Pte LtdSingapore High CourtYes[2006] 1 SLR(R) 888SingaporeCited regarding a landlord-tenant dispute over rent for fixtures.
HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) Limited v Chief AssessorCourt of AppealYes[2013] 2 SLR 173SingaporeCited regarding the objective inquiry of the rent that a hypothetical tenant can reasonably be expected to pay.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Property Tax Act (Cap 254, 2005 Rev Ed)Singapore
Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2014 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Annual value
  • Property tax
  • Fixtures
  • Chattels
  • Rebus sic stantibus
  • Hypothetical tenant
  • Fitting-out works
  • Bare shell
  • Tenant's covenants

15.2 Keywords

  • property tax
  • annual value
  • fixtures
  • CapitaLand
  • Plaza Singapura
  • Singapore
  • Chief Assessor

17. Areas of Law

Area NameRelevance Score
Revenue Law95
Property Tax90
Annual Value85
Property Law70

16. Subjects

  • Property Law
  • Tax Law
  • Real Estate Valuation