Huationg Contractor Pte Ltd v Choon Lai Kuen: Breach of Contract and Exclusion Clauses in Towing Services

In Huationg Contractor Pte Ltd v Choon Lai Kuen (trading as Yishun Trading Towing Service), the High Court of Singapore heard a case regarding a breach of contract. Huationg Contractor sued Yishun Trading Towing Service after a concrete pump truck, while being towed by Yishun Trading, caught fire. Huationg alleged breaches of a bailment contract, while Yishun Trading denied the breaches and sought to rely on limitation and exemption clauses. The court, presided over by Lee Seiu Kin J, found in favor of Yishun Trading, holding that they were not negligent and that the liability clauses were not successfully incorporated into the contract. The claim was dismissed.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for Defendant

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Huationg Contractor sued Yishun Trading for breach of contract after a towed truck caught fire. The court found no negligence by Yishun Trading and that liability clauses were not incorporated.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Huationg Contractor Pte LtdPlaintiffCorporationClaim DismissedLost
Choon Lai Kuen t/a Yishun Trading Towing ServiceDefendantIndividualJudgment for DefendantWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Lee Seiu KinJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Huationg engaged Yishun Towing to tow a concrete pump truck.
  2. The truck caught fire during towing.
  3. The fire was likely caused by a slow air leak in the parking brake's pressure chamber.
  4. The contract between the parties was not written.
  5. Limitation and exemption clauses were printed on the reverse side of Yishun Towing’s work orders.
  6. The work orders were operational documents used to track job assignments and compute driver salaries.
  7. The limitation and exemption clauses were not discussed during the formation of the contract.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Huationg Contractor Pte Ltd v Choon Lai Kuen (trading as Yishun Trading Towing Service), Suit No 730 of 2018, [2020] SGHC 129

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Truck caught fire while being towed
Suit filed
Trial began
Trial continues
Trial continues
Trial continues
Trial continues
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Contract
    • Outcome: The court found that the defendant was not negligent and therefore did not breach the contract.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Incorporation of Exclusion Clauses
    • Outcome: The court held that the liability clauses had not been successfully incorporated into the services agreement.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Negligence
    • Outcome: The court found that the defendant was not negligent in discharging its duties under the services agreement.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract
  • Breach of Bailment

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Transportation
  • Construction

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Sun Technosystems Pte Ltd v Federal Express Services (M) Sdn BhdHigh CourtYes[2007] 1 SLR(R) 411SingaporeCited for the principle that the onus is on the bailee to prove they took reasonable care of the goods.
Chua Chye Leong Alan v Grand Palace De-luxe Nite Club Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[1993] 2 SLR(R) 420SingaporeCited for the principle regarding the reasonableness of bringing exclusion clauses to the attention of the plaintiff.
R1 International Pte Ltd v Lonstroff AGCourt of AppealYes[2015] 1 SLR 521SingaporeDistinguished from the present case regarding the incorporation of terms in a contract through supplementary documents.
Vinmar Overseas (Singapore) Pte Ltd v PTT International Trading Pte LtdCourt of AppealYes[2018] 2 SLR 1271SingaporeDistinguished from the present case regarding the incorporation of terms through a course of dealing.
Hely-Hutchinson v Brayhead Ltd and anotherEnglish Court of AppealYes[1968] 1 QB 549EnglandDistinguished from the present case regarding the implied authority of employees to contract on behalf of a company.
Harling v EddyCourt of AppealYes[1951] 2 KB 739EnglandCited for the principle that a party cannot escape liability by simply putting up a printed notice with exempting conditions; they must show it is a contractual document accepted by the affected party.
Kua Lee Ngoh v Jagindar SinghHigh CourtYes[1987] SLR(R) 119SingaporeCited for the principle that simple displays of contractual terms are insufficient to incorporate them into a contract without sufficient notice.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Bailment
  • Exclusion Clause
  • Limitation Clause
  • Towing Services
  • Work Order
  • Pressure Leak Theory
  • Accident Theory
  • Riding Theory
  • Incorporation
  • Course of Dealing

15.2 Keywords

  • breach of contract
  • exclusion clause
  • towing service
  • negligence
  • singapore
  • high court

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Contract Law
  • Bailment
  • Exclusion Clauses
  • Transportation Law