Wee Teng Yau v Comptroller of Income Tax: Income Tax Avoidance via Corporate Structure
Dr. Wee Teng Yau appealed against the Comptroller of Income Tax's decision to tax him on fees received by his company, Straighten Pte Ltd (SPL), from Alfred Cheng Orthodontic Clinic Pte Ltd (ACOC). The High Court dismissed Dr. Wee's appeal, finding that the arrangement's primary purpose was tax avoidance, thus falling under s 33(1) of the Income Tax Act. The court also addressed the Comptroller's cross-appeal regarding the interpretation of AQQ and the 'personal exertion' principle, noting that the Comptroller's submissions could have been incorporated in its submissions in TA 10 of 2020.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court of the Republic of Singapore1.2 Outcome
Dr. Wee’s appeal is dismissed. The Comptroller’s submissions regarding the Income Tax Board of Review’s interpretation were noted.
1.3 Case Type
Tax
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
The High Court held that Dr. Wee's arrangement to receive income through his company, SPL, was primarily for tax avoidance and thus taxable under s 33(1) of the Income Tax Act.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wee Teng Yau | Appellant, Respondent | Individual | Appeal Dismissed | Lost | Lau Kah Hee, Muhammad Fikri Yeong Bin Iskandar Shah |
Comptroller of Income Tax | Respondent, Appellant | Government Agency | Appeal Upheld | Won | Zheng Sicong, Lau Sze Leng Serene |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Choo Han Teck | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Lau Kah Hee | BC Lim & Lau LLC |
Muhammad Fikri Yeong Bin Iskandar Shah | BC Lim & Lau LLC |
Zheng Sicong | Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore |
Lau Sze Leng Serene | Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore |
4. Facts
- Dr. Wee was employed by ACOC from January 2011 to May 2012.
- Dr. Wee incorporated SPL on May 1, 2012, becoming its sole director and shareholder.
- After May 1, 2012, ACOC paid SPL for Dr. Wee's services instead of paying Dr. Wee directly.
- SPL paid Dr. Wee a salary and director's fees, and declared tax-exempt dividends.
- Dr. Wee's remuneration from SPL was significantly lower than his previous direct earnings from ACOC.
- The Comptroller treated the fees received by SPL from ACOC as Dr. Wee's income.
5. Formal Citations
- Wee Teng Yau v Comptroller of Income Tax and another appeal, Tax Appeals Nos 10 and 11 of 2020, [2020] SGHC 236
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Dr. Wee employed by Alfred Cheng Orthodontic Clinic Pte Ltd | |
Straighten Pte Ltd incorporated by Dr. Wee | |
Dr. Wee provides dental services to ACOC through SPL | |
Hearing date | |
Hearing date | |
Judgment reserved |
7. Legal Issues
- Tax Avoidance
- Outcome: The court held that the arrangement's primary purpose was tax avoidance, thus falling under s 33(1) of the Income Tax Act.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Use of corporate structure to reduce personal income tax
- Bona fide commercial reasons vs. tax avoidance as main purpose
- Related Cases:
- [2014] 2 SLR 847
8. Remedies Sought
- Declaration that Dr. Wee is only taxable on his personal income from SPL
- Reversal of the Comptroller's tax assessment
9. Cause of Actions
- Avoidance of Income Tax
10. Practice Areas
- Tax Law
- Tax Litigation
11. Industries
- Healthcare
- Dental
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Comptroller of Income Tax v AQQ and another appeal | High Court | Yes | [2014] 2 SLR 847 | Singapore | Cited regarding the interpretation and application of s 33 of the Income Tax Act. |
Spratt v Commissioner of Inland Revenue | Unknown | Yes | [1964] NZLR 272 | New Zealand | Cited for the 'personal exertion' principle, which the court found not directly applicable in this case due to the existence of s 33 of the Income Tax Act. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Income Tax Act (Cap 134, 2008 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
Income Tax Act (Cap 134, 2014 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
s 33(1) of the Income Tax Act | Singapore |
s 33(3)(b) of the Income Tax Act | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Tax avoidance
- Income Tax Act
- Section 33(1)
- Section 33(3)(b)
- Bona fide commercial reasons
- Personal exertion principle
- Arrangement
- Tax advantage
- Director's remuneration
- Tax-exempt dividends
15.2 Keywords
- Tax avoidance
- Income tax
- Corporate structure
- Singapore
- Dentist
- SPL
- ACOC
16. Subjects
- Taxation
- Corporate Tax
- Personal Income Tax
17. Areas of Law
- Revenue Law
- Income Taxation
- Tax Avoidance