Sompo Insurance v Royal & Sun Alliance: Subrogation & Performance Bonds
In Sompo Insurance Singapore Pte Ltd v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance plc, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal regarding the right of subrogation in marine insurance. Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance plc (RSA), as the insurer of the Government of Singapore, sought to exercise its right of subrogation to call upon a performance bond issued by Sompo Insurance Singapore Pte Ltd (Sompo) to the Government, following a loss of cargo during shipment. The High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that RSA's right of subrogation extended to calling upon the performance bond.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
General Division of the High Court1.2 Outcome
Appeal Dismissed
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
The High Court held that an insurer's subrogation rights extend to calling on a performance bond provided to the insured.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sompo Insurance Singapore Pte Ltd | Appellant | Corporation | Appeal Dismissed | Lost | |
Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance plc | Respondent | Corporation | Appeal Dismissed | Won |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Philip Jeyaretnam | Judicial Commissioner | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- The Government of Singapore contracted with Geometra for the shipment of cargo.
- Sompo issued a performance bond to the Government as security for Geometra's obligations.
- RSA insured the Government for losses to the cargo.
- Cargo was damaged during shipment.
- RSA indemnified the Government for the loss.
- RSA, as subrogee, sought to call on the performance bond issued by Sompo.
- Sompo refused to pay, arguing RSA had no right to call on the bond.
5. Formal Citations
- Sompo Insurance Singapore Pte Ltd v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance plc, Registrar’s Appeal from State Courts No 12 of 2021, [2021] SGHC 152
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Government of Singapore and Geometra Worldwide Movers Pte Ltd entered into a Carriage Contract | |
Sompo issued a Performance Bond in favour of the Government | |
Cargo was loaded on board a vessel in good order and condition at Singapore | |
One of the containers fell into the sea during discharge | |
RSA indemnified the Government for the full quantified loss | |
RSA’s solicitors, Clyde & Co LLP, wrote to Sompo on behalf of RSA and the Government to call on the Performance Bond | |
Sompo denied RSA’s claim | |
The Government and RSA entered into a Deed of Assignment | |
RSA obtained judgment in the District Court | |
Hearing date | |
Judgment reserved |
7. Legal Issues
- Strict Compliance with Terms of Performance Bond
- Outcome: The court held that the demand made by RSA's solicitors complied with the terms of the Performance Bond.
- Category: Substantive
- Related Cases:
- [2012] 3 SLR 125
- Extent of Subrogation Rights
- Outcome: The court held that the right of subrogation extends to calling upon a performance bond provided to the insured by a third party.
- Category: Substantive
- Related Cases:
- [1993] AC 713
- [1883] 11 QBD 380
8. Remedies Sought
- Payment under Performance Bond
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Contract
- Subrogation
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
- Insurance Litigation
11. Industries
- Insurance
- Shipping
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Master Marine AS v Labroy Offshore Ltd | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2012] 3 SLR 125 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that a demand on a bond must strictly comply with the terms of the bond. |
Maridive & Oil Services (SAE) and another v CAN Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd | English Court of Appeal | No | [2002] 1 All ER (Comm) 653 | England and Wales | Cited regarding the validity of a demand made by solicitors on behalf of a protection and indemnity club. |
Lord Napier and Ettrick and another v Hunter and others | House of Lords | Yes | [1993] AC 713 | England and Wales | Cited for the juridical basis of the law of subrogation. |
Castellain v Preston and others | Queen's Bench Division | Yes | [1883] 11 QBD 380 | England and Wales | Cited for the classic description of the doctrine of subrogation. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Marine Insurance Act 1906 (c 41) (UK), s 79(2) | United Kingdom |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Subrogation
- Performance Bond
- Marine Insurance
- Indemnity
- Strict Compliance
- Carriage Contract
- Beneficiary
- Insured Loss
15.2 Keywords
- subrogation
- performance bond
- marine insurance
- insurance
- contract
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Subrogation | 95 |
Performance Bond | 90 |
Insurance | 75 |
Contract Law | 60 |
Admiralty and Maritime Law | 40 |
Breach of Contract | 30 |
Banking and Finance | 30 |
Commercial Law | 25 |
Assignment | 20 |
Shipping | 20 |
16. Subjects
- Insurance
- Contract Law
- Shipping Law