Star Entertainment QLD Ltd v Yong Khong Yoong Mark: Reciprocal Enforcement of Foreign Gambling Judgments

In Star Entertainment QLD Ltd v Yong Khong Yoong Mark, the General Division of the High Court of Singapore addressed the issue of registering a foreign judgment based on gambling debts. The Judgment Creditor, Star Entertainment QLD Limited, sought to register a default judgment obtained in Australia against the Judgment Debtor, Yong Khong Yoong Mark, under the Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act. The court, bound by the precedent set in Liao Eng Kiat v Burswood Nominees Ltd, dismissed the Judgment Debtor's appeal and declined to set aside the registration, despite a later Court of Appeal expressing doubts about the correctness of the Burswood Nominees decision. The primary legal issue was whether section 3(2)(f) of the RECJA bars the registration of a foreign judgment based on a gambling debt.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal dismissed; registration of the Australian judgment under the Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act declined to be set aside.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Singapore court considers registration of Australian judgment for gambling debts under RECJA, bound by precedent despite doubts on prior ruling.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
The Star Entertainment QLD LimitedApplicantCorporationAppeal DismissedLostYogarajah Yoga Sharmini, Shawn Tien Si Yuan
Khong Yoong Mark YongRespondentIndividualRegistration of Judgment UpheldWonCheo Chai Beng Johnny

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Pang Khang ChauJudge of the High CourtYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Yogarajah Yoga SharminiHaridass Ho & Partners
Shawn Tien Si YuanHaridass Ho & Partners
Cheo Chai Beng JohnnyCheo Yeoh & Associates LLC

4. Facts

  1. The Judgment Creditor operates a casino in Queensland, Australia.
  2. The Judgment Debtor was a customer of the Casino.
  3. The Judgment Debtor incurred debts arising from his patronage of the Casino.
  4. The Judgment Creditor obtained a default judgment against the Judgment Debtor in the Supreme Court of Queensland.
  5. The debt underlying the Judgment was incurred pursuant to a cheque cashing facility.
  6. The Judgment Debtor was an experienced patron of gambling establishments.
  7. Gambling by the Judgment Debtor at the Casino was not against public policy in Australia.

5. Formal Citations

  1. The Star Entertainment QLD Ltd v Yong Khong Yoong Mark, Originating Summons No 221 of 2021(Registrar’s Appeal No 276 of 2021), [2021] SGHC 280

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Queensland's Casino Control Act 1982 issued.
Judgment Debtor used the Casino’s CCF in Sydney, Australia.
Judgment Debtor used the Casino’s CCF twice.
Judgment Creditor obtained a default judgment against the Judgment Debtor in the Supreme Court of Queensland.
Hearing date.
Judgment date.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Enforcement of Foreign Gambling Debts
    • Outcome: The court held that it was bound by precedent to allow the registration of the foreign judgment, despite reservations about the correctness of that precedent.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Public Policy Exception to Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
    • Outcome: The court found that the domestic public policy against enforcing gambling debts did not meet the higher threshold of 'international' public policy required to refuse registration of a foreign judgment.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Registration of Foreign Judgment
  2. Monetary payment of debt

9. Cause of Actions

  • Recovery of Gambling Debts

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Gaming

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Liao Eng Kiat v Burswood Nominees LtdCourt of AppealYes[2004] 4 SLR(R) 690SingaporeThe Court of Appeal held that s 3(2)(f) of the Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act does not bar the registration of a foreign judgment based on a gambling debt. This case is binding on the present case.
Poh Soon Kiat v Desert Palace Inc (trading as Caesars Palace)Court of AppealYes[2010] 1 SLR 1129SingaporeThe Court of Appeal commented that Liao Eng Kiat v Burswood Nominees Ltd was wrongly decided. However, the court in Star Entertainment took the view that the comments made in Desert Palace regarding Burswood Nominees were obiter.
Star Cruise Services Ltd v Overseas Union Bank LtdN/AYes[1999] 2 SLR(R) 183SingaporeCited for the principle that claims for gambling debts could not be entertained by Singapore courts even if such debts were incurred pursuant to gambling activities overseas and wagering contracts governed by foreign law.
Star City Pty Ltd (formerly known as Sydney Harbour Casino Pty Ltd) v Tan Hong WoonN/AYes[2002] 1 SLR(R) 306SingaporeCited for the principle that claims for gambling debts could not be entertained by Singapore courts even if such debts were incurred pursuant to gambling activities overseas and wagering contracts governed by foreign law.
Star Entertainment QLD Ltd v Wong Yew Choy and another matterN/AYes[2020] 5 SLR 1SingaporeCited for the principle that claims for gambling debts could not be entertained by Singapore courts even if such debts were incurred pursuant to gambling activities overseas and wagering contracts governed by foreign law.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act (Cap 264, 1985 Rev Ed)Singapore
Civil Law Act (Cap 43, 1999 Rev Ed)Singapore
Casino Control Act 1982Queensland, Australia

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act
  • Cheque Cashing Facility
  • Gambling Debt
  • Public Policy
  • Foreign Judgment
  • Casino
  • Registration of Judgment

15.2 Keywords

  • foreign judgment
  • gambling debt
  • RECJA
  • Singapore
  • Australia
  • casino
  • enforcement

16. Subjects

  • Conflict of Laws
  • Enforcement of Judgments
  • Gambling Law

17. Areas of Law

  • Conflict of Laws
  • Foreign Judgments
  • Betting, Gaming and Lotteries
  • Civil Procedure