Lim Choo Hin v Lim Sai Ing Peggy: Resulting Trusts & Inter Vivos Gifts Dispute

In Lim Choo Hin (as the sole executrix of the estate of Lim Guan Heong, deceased) v Lim Sai Ing Peggy, the High Court of Singapore addressed a dispute between siblings over their late father's property. The applicant, Lim Choo Hin, sought a declaration that the property was held on trust by the respondent, Lim Sai Ing Peggy, for the estate of their father. The court dismissed the application, finding that the respondent was the beneficial owner of the property due to a gift from their father, and there was no basis for a resulting trust.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court

1.2 Outcome

Application dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

A dispute among siblings over their late father's property. The court determined that the respondent was the beneficial owner of the property due to a gift.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Lim Choo Hin (as the sole executrix of the estate of Lim Guan Heong, deceased)ApplicantIndividualApplication dismissedLostTan Kwee Sain Pauline
Lim Sai Ing PeggyRespondentIndividualApplication dismissedWonLim Cheng Hock Lawrence

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Chan Seng OnnJudge of the High CourtYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Tan Kwee Sain PaulineP Tan & Co
Lim Cheng Hock LawrenceMatthew Chiong Partnership

4. Facts

  1. Mr Lim was the owner of a Housing Development Board flat.
  2. Mr Lim held the Property as joint tenants with Ms Lim Sai Ing Peggy.
  3. Ms Lim Choo Hin seeks a declaration that the Property is held on trust by the respondent for the estate of Mr Lim.
  4. The respondent claims that she is the true beneficial owner of the Property.
  5. The Property was purchased under a sale and purchase agreement dated 7 November 1975.
  6. The Property was registered in Mr Lim’s sole name at the time of purchase.
  7. On 1 April 1981, the respondent was registered as a joint owner of the Property.
  8. In 2001, Mr Lim arranged for the applicant’s name to be added to the Property as another joint owner.
  9. On 6 September 2013, the applicant removed her name from the Property.
  10. Prior to his passing on 4 September 2015, Mr Lim executed a will on 27 April 2015.
  11. Under the Will, Mr Lim bequeathed his share in the Property to LKY.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Lim Choo Hin (as the sole executrix of the estate of Lim Guan Heong, deceased)vLim Sai Ing Peggy, , [2021] SGHC 52

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Sale and purchase agreement for the Property signed
Completion of Property purchase
Mr Lim's wife passed on
Respondent registered as a joint owner of the Property
Mr Lim, LKY, LSE, the applicant and the respondent purchased the Shophouse under the HDB Tenants Priority Scheme
Applicant's name added to the Property as another joint owner
Applicant removed her name from the Property
Transfer instruments lodged for applicant's removal from Property title
Respondent moved out of the Property
Sale of the Shophouse completed
Mr Lim executed a will
Mr Lim passed away
Grant of Probate obtained
Applicant furnished respondent with copies of Grant of Probate and the Will
Respondent filed the Notice of Death of Mr Lim over the Property
Applicant discovered the Notice of Death filed by the respondent
Applicant lodged a caveat against the Property
Applicant filed the Application
Respondent filed HC/SUM 4277/2020
Judgment reserved on the Application and SUM 4277
Judgment delivered

7. Legal Issues

  1. Resulting Trust
    • Outcome: The court found that there was never a trust over the Property.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [1996] AC 669
  2. Inter Vivos Gift
    • Outcome: The court found that Mr Lim bestowed a gift to the respondent when he added her name to the property register.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Declaration that the Property is held on trust by the respondent for the estate of Mr Lim

9. Cause of Actions

  • Declaration of Trust

10. Practice Areas

  • Trust Law
  • Estate Planning

11. Industries

  • Real Estate

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington London Borough CouncilN/AYes[1996] AC 669N/ACited for the principle of presumption of resulting trust where an individual makes a voluntary payment for the purchase of a property that is then vested in the other person or in both of them jointly.
Lim Beng Kiat v Mohammad Sarman bin SaidiHigh CourtYes[2020] SGHC 253SingaporeCited as an instance where Lord Browne-Wilkinson’s observations in Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington London Borough Council were accepted locally.
Estate of Yang Chun (Mrs) née Sun Hui Min, deceased v Yang Chia-YinN/AYes[2019] 5 SLR 593N/ACited as an instance where Lord Browne-Wilkinson’s observations in Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington London Borough Council were accepted locally.
Lau Siew Kim v Yeo Guan Chye Terence and anotherN/AYes[2008] 2 SLR(R) 108N/ACited as an instance where Lord Browne-Wilkinson’s observations in Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington London Borough Council were accepted locally.
Chan Yuen Lan v See Fong MunN/AYes[2014] 3 SLR 1048N/ACited for the principle that the presumption of resulting trust is equity’s response to the lack of intention by the transferor to benefit the transferee.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Housing and Development Act (Cap 129, 2004 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Resulting trust
  • Inter vivos gift
  • Joint tenants
  • Beneficial interest
  • Bare legal title
  • Right of survivorship
  • Housing Development Board
  • Property register

15.2 Keywords

  • trusts
  • resulting trusts
  • inter vivos gifts
  • property
  • inheritance
  • Singapore
  • High Court

16. Subjects

  • Trusts
  • Property Law
  • Inheritance Law

17. Areas of Law

  • Trusts
  • Resulting trusts
  • Presumed resulting trusts
  • Gifts
  • Inter vivos