VWW v VWX: Appeal for Abridgement of Time to Enter Final Judgment in Divorce Proceedings
In VWW v VWX, before the General Division of the High Court (Family Division), the husband, VWW, appealed against the dismissal of his application for abridgement of time to enter final judgment in divorce proceedings against the wife, VWX. The husband sought the abridgement to marry his girlfriend, the mother of his child, to secure their immigration status in Singapore. Choo Han Teck J dismissed the appeal, holding that the husband's extramarital affairs did not justify expediting the final judgment, and he could legitimize his children after the divorce.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
General Division of the High Court (Family Division)1.2 Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
1.3 Case Type
Family
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Appeal concerning the dismissal of an application for abridgement of time to enter final judgment in divorce. The court dismissed the appeal, citing the husband's extramarital affairs.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Choo Han Teck | Judge of the High Court | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Alina Sim Jin Simm | Axis Law Corporation |
Nicholas Leow Zhi Wei | Netto & Magin LLC |
4. Facts
- The wife filed for divorce on 2 November 2020.
- The interim judgment was made on 4 March 2021.
- The husband applied to enter Final Judgment on 8 June 2021.
- The husband's girlfriend gave birth to his child on 7 May 2020 and is pregnant with their second child.
- The husband sought to expedite the divorce to marry his girlfriend and secure her and their child's immigration status in Singapore.
- The wife contended she had no knowledge of the husband's extramarital affairs.
5. Formal Citations
- VWWvVWX and another matter, , [2021] SGHCF 35
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Husband and wife married | |
Husband's girlfriend gave birth to a child | |
Wife filed for divorce | |
Interim judgment made | |
Husband applied to enter Final Judgment | |
Appeal dismissed |
7. Legal Issues
- Abridgement of time to enter final judgment
- Outcome: The court dismissed the appeal, refusing to abridge the time for entering the final judgment.
- Category: Procedural
8. Remedies Sought
- Abridgement of time to enter final judgment
9. Cause of Actions
- Divorce
10. Practice Areas
- Family Law
- Divorce
- Appeals
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No cited cases |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
Rule 96(3)(a) of the Family Justice Rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Legitimacy Act (Cap 162, 1985 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Abridgement of time
- Final judgment
- Interim judgment
- Extramarital affairs
- Illegitimacy
- Immigration status
15.2 Keywords
- Divorce
- Family Law
- Abridgement
- Final Judgment
- Singapore
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Family Law | 95 |
Matrimonial Proceedings | 70 |
Abridgement of Time | 60 |
Civil Practice | 40 |
16. Subjects
- Family Law
- Divorce
- Civil Procedure