Anpex Pte Ltd v Cheng Yong Sun: Unlawful Conspiracy to Injure in Delivery & Logistics Business

In Anpex Pte Ltd v Cheng Yong Sun and Lee Chai Yun, Winnie, the High Court of Singapore ruled in favor of the plaintiff, Anpex Pte Ltd, finding that the defendants, Cheng Yong Sun and Lee Chai Yun, Winnie, conspired to misappropriate funds from Anpex, causing a loss of $578,347.30. The court found the second defendant liable for unlawful conspiracy to injure the plaintiff. The plaintiff brought a claim of conspiracy to injure.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for Plaintiff

1.3 Case Type

Tort

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Anpex sued Cheng & Lee for conspiracy to injure. The court found they conspired to misappropriate funds, causing Anpex to lose $578,347.30.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Anpex Pte LtdPlaintiffCorporationJudgment for PlaintiffWonRakesh s/o Pokkan Vasu, Farhan Tyebally
Cheng Yong SunDefendantIndividualJudgment in default of appearanceLost
Lee Chai Yun, WinnieDefendantIndividualJudgment for PlaintiffLostNg Boon Gan

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudge of the High CourtYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Rakesh s/o Pokkan VasuGomez & Vasu LLC
Farhan TyeballyGomez & Vasu LLC
Ng Boon GanVanillaLaw LLC

4. Facts

  1. The plaintiff is a company providing delivery, logistics and transport services.
  2. Ms Leow is the director and shareholder of the plaintiff.
  3. Cheng Yong Sun was employed by Auto as an associate manager.
  4. Winnie was employed by Auto as an administrative executive.
  5. Ms Leow discovered suspicious payments from the plaintiff’s account to the defendants.
  6. The plaintiff’s subcontractors were transferring monies directly to the second defendant’s bank account.
  7. The plaintiff says that the first and second defendants misappropriated $578,347.30.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Anpex Pte Ltd v Cheng Yong Sun and another, Suit No 415 of 2021, [2022] SGHC 115

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Cheng Yong Sun employed by Auto
Suspicious payments out of plaintiff’s account began
Plaintiff’s subcontractors began transferring monies to the second defendant’s bank account
Cheng Yong Sun introduced Winnie to Ms Leow
Winnie employed by Auto
Suspicious payments out of plaintiff’s account ended
Plaintiff’s subcontractors transferring monies to the second defendant’s bank account ended
Judgment in default of appearance obtained against the first defendant
Suit No 415 of 2021 filed
Hearing date
Hearing date
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Conspiracy to Injure
    • Outcome: The court found that the first and second defendants conspired to misappropriate funds from the plaintiff, and knowingly caused the plaintiff to lose $578,347.30.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Conspiracy to Injure
  • Unjust Enrichment
  • Breach of Duties of Honesty and Loyalty

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Logistics
  • Transportation

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Misappropriation
  • Unlawful Conspiracy
  • Delivery Services
  • Logistics
  • Transport Services

15.2 Keywords

  • conspiracy
  • misappropriation
  • delivery
  • logistics
  • transport

16. Subjects

  • Tort Law
  • Conspiracy Law
  • Commercial Dispute

17. Areas of Law

  • Tort
  • Conspiracy
  • Unlawful Conspiracy to Injure