Law Society v Mohammed Lutfi: False Attestation & Professional Misconduct

In Law Society of Singapore v Mohammed Lutfi bin Hussin, the Court of Three Judges addressed the professional misconduct of Mohammed Lutfi, who falsely attested to witnessing a signature on a mortgage instrument and neglected his professional duties in a conveyancing transaction. The Law Society brought charges against Lutfi, and the Disciplinary Tribunal found him guilty of grossly improper conduct. The Court of Three Judges imposed a three-year suspension, emphasizing the importance of honesty and diligence in the legal profession.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Court of Three Judges of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Respondent suspended from practice for three years.

1.3 Case Type

Regulatory

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Lawyer suspended for 3 years for falsely attesting a mortgage instrument and neglecting professional duties in a conveyancing transaction.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Law Society of SingaporeApplicantStatutory BoardOrder for suspension grantedWon
Mohammed Lutfi bin HussinRespondentIndividualSuspension from practiceLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Andrew Phang Boon LeongJustice of the Court of AppealYes
Judith PrakashJustice of the Court of AppealNo
Steven ChongJustice of the Court of AppealNo

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Respondent falsely represented that he witnessed Naseeruddin signing the Mortgage Instrument.
  2. Respondent did not meet Naseeruddin throughout the conveyancing transaction.
  3. Respondent signed the Certificate of Correctness to the Transfer Instrument without verifying information with Naseeruddin.
  4. Respondent had a 'system' where his staff handled conveyancing transactions without his direct involvement.
  5. Naseeruddin defaulted on his mortgage after perpetrating fraud on Maybank.
  6. Respondent pleaded guilty to charges under s 59(6) of the Land Titles Act.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Law Society of Singapore v Mohammed Lutfi bin Hussin, Originating Summons No 6 of 2021, [2022] SGHC 182

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Mohammed Lutfi bin Hussin admitted to the Roll of Advocates and Solicitors.
Lutfi Law Corporation incorporated.
Naseeruddin introduced to Angela, a conveyancing secretary of Lutfi Law Corporation.
Respondent signed as witness to Naseeruddin’s signature on the Mortgage Instrument.
Respondent signed the Certificate of Correctness to the Transfer Instrument.
Respondent charged under s 59(6) of the LTA for falsely certifying the Mortgage Instrument.
Respondent faced an additional charge under s 59(6) of the LTA for falsely certifying the Transfer Instrument.
Respondent pleaded guilty to both charges in the State Courts.
Respondent convicted on the LTA Charges and sentenced to a fine of S$5,600.
Attorney-General requested the Law Society to refer the matter to a disciplinary tribunal.
Judgment reserved.
Judgment delivered.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Grossly Improper Conduct
    • Outcome: The court found the respondent guilty of grossly improper conduct.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • False attestation
      • Negligence in professional duty
  2. Misconduct Unbefitting an Advocate and Solicitor
    • Outcome: The court found the respondent guilty of misconduct unbefitting an advocate and solicitor.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Disciplinary Action
  2. Suspension from Practice
  3. Striking off the Roll

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Professional Duty
  • Violation of Legal Profession Act

10. Practice Areas

  • Regulatory Law
  • Professional Discipline

11. Industries

  • Legal Services
  • Real Estate

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Law Society of Singapore v Ezekiel Peter LatimerCourt of Three JudgesYes[2019] 4 SLR 1427SingaporeCited for the objectives of imposing sanctions under s 83(1) of the LPA.
Law Society of Singapore v Udeh Kumar s/o Sethuraju and another matterCourt of Three JudgesYes[2017] 4 SLR 1369SingaporeCited for the principle that any form of dishonesty, even 'technical' dishonesty, will almost invariably lead to an order for striking off.
Law Society of Singapore v Chia Choon YangCourt of Three JudgesYes[2018] 5 SLR 1068SingaporeCited for the operative legal principles for determining the appropriate sanction against a dishonest errant solicitor.
Loh Der Ming Andrew v Koh Tien HuaHigh CourtYes[2022] SGHC 84SingaporeCited for the firm stance that the court takes towards dishonest conduct.
Law Society of Singapore v Thirumurthy Ayernaar PambayanHigh CourtYes[2022] SGHC 79SingaporeCited as a case where the C3J imposed a suspension of nine months to sanction an act of false attestation, and distinguished from the present case.
Anwar Patrick Adrian and another v Ng Chong & Hue LLC and anotherCourt of AppealYes[2014] 3 SLR 761SingaporeCited for the principle that an accurate certificate of correctness for registration is of paramount importance.
Law Society of Singapore v Sum Chong Mun and anotherCourt of Three JudgesYes[2017] 4 SLR 707SingaporeCited as a case with similar facts that resulted in a one-year suspension, and distinguished from the present case.
Wong Kok Chin v Mah Ten Kui JosephCourt of AppealYes[1992] 1 SLR(R) 894SingaporeCited for the mirror principle underpinning the Torrens System of land registration.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2009 Rev Ed)Singapore
Land Titles Act (Cap 157, 2004 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • False Attestation
  • Certificate of Correctness
  • Mortgage Instrument
  • Transfer Instrument
  • Conveyancing
  • Professional Misconduct
  • Grossly Improper Conduct
  • Land Titles Act
  • Disciplinary Tribunal
  • Court of Three Judges

15.2 Keywords

  • legal profession
  • professional misconduct
  • false attestation
  • conveyancing
  • disciplinary action
  • suspension
  • Singapore

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Legal Ethics
  • Professional Responsibility
  • Conveyancing Practice