Koh Shu Cii Iris v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Public Prosecutor's Decision to Discontinue Appeal
In Koh Shu Cii Iris v Attorney-General, the High Court of Singapore dismissed an application by Koh Shu Cii Iris for permission to proceed with judicial review against the Attorney-General's decision to discontinue her appeal against the dismissal of her Magistrate's Complaint. The court, presided over by See Kee Oon J, found no arguable case of reasonable suspicion that the Attorney-General's decision was illegal, irrational, or procedurally improper. The application was filed on 14 April 2023 and the judgment was delivered on 17 August 2023.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
General Division of the High Court1.2 Outcome
Application dismissed
1.3 Case Type
Judicial Review
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Judicial review application concerning the Attorney-General's decision to discontinue an appeal against the dismissal of a Magistrate's Complaint. Application dismissed.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Koh Shu Cii Iris | Applicant | Individual | Application dismissed | Lost | Mohamed Arshad bin Mohamed, Patrick Fernandez |
Attorney-General | Respondent | Government Agency | Won | Won | Lim Tze Etsuko, Jiang Ke-Yue |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
See Kee Oon | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Mohamed Arshad bin Mohamed | Fernandez LLC |
Patrick Fernandez | Fernandez LLC |
Lim Tze Etsuko | Attorney-General’s Chambers |
Jiang Ke-Yue | Attorney-General’s Chambers |
4. Facts
- The Applicant was investigated for alleged criminal offences and subsequently charged in court.
- The police seized the Applicant’s MacBook laptop, her Vivo handphone and an Original Cloud E-mail Disk.
- The Applicant asserted legal professional privilege over the material in the Electronic Devices.
- The Applicant alleged that the police officers had breached the legal professional privilege review protocol.
- The Senior Magistrate dismissed her complaint under s 152(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (2020 Rev Ed).
- The Respondent conveyed his position that the Applicant’s appeal was legally unsustainable.
- The Respondent informed the Supreme Court Registry that he would intervene to discontinue the appeal.
5. Formal Citations
- Koh Shu Cii Iris v Attorney-General, Originating Application No 387 of 2023, [2023] SGHC 229
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Magistrate’s Complaint filed | |
Senior Magistrate examined the Applicant on oath | |
Notice of appeal filed | |
Respondent conveyed position that appeal was legally unsustainable | |
Respondent reiterated that complaint had been properly dismissed | |
Respondent informed Supreme Court Registry that he would intervene to discontinue the appeal | |
Application filed | |
Hearing | |
Judgment delivered |
7. Legal Issues
- Illegality
- Outcome: The court held that the Attorney-General's decision was not illegal.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Errors of law
- Erroneous interpretations of statutes
- Irrationality
- Outcome: The court held that the Attorney-General's decision was not irrational.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Taking into account irrelevant considerations
- Failing to take into account relevant considerations
- Procedural Impropriety
- Outcome: The court held that there was no procedural impropriety in the Attorney-General's decision.
- Category: Procedural
- Sub-Issues:
- Denial of fair hearing
- Denial of opportunity to correct erroneous decision
8. Remedies Sought
- Quashing order
- Declaratory relief
9. Cause of Actions
- Judicial Review
10. Practice Areas
- Judicial Review
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jeyaretnam Kenneth Andrew v Attorney-General | Unknown | Yes | [2014] 1 SLR 345 | Singapore | Cited for the requirements for the grant of permission to commence judicial review. |
Iris Koh Shu Cii v Christopher Koh and others | Magistrate Court | Yes | [2023] SGMC 2 | Singapore | Cited for the Senior Magistrate’s written grounds of decision dismissing the Applicant's complaint. |
Knight Glenn Jeyasingam v Public Prosecutor | Unknown | Yes | [1998] 3 SLR(R) 196 | Singapore | Cited for the meaning of a “final order” and held that the test for finality is to see whether the judgment or order finally disposes of the rights of the parties. |
Cheong Chun Yin v Attorney-General | Unknown | Yes | [2014] 3 SLR 1141 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that declaratory relief is contingent on the grant of permission to apply for a prerogative order. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Penal Code 1871 (2020 Rev Ed) s 182 | Singapore |
Penal Code 1871 (2020 Rev Ed) s 187(1) | Singapore |
Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (2020 Rev Ed) s 152(1) | Singapore |
Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (2020 Rev Ed) s 151(2) | Singapore |
Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (2020 Rev Ed) s 374(1) | Singapore |
Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (2020 Rev Ed) s 423 | Singapore |
Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (2020 Rev Ed) s 376 | Singapore |
Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (2020 Rev Ed) s 401(1) | Singapore |
Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (2020 Rev Ed) s 400(2) | Singapore |
Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (2020 Rev Ed) s 400(1) | Singapore |
Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (2020 Rev Ed) s 11(6) | Singapore |
Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (2020 Rev Ed) s 11(1) | Singapore |
Community Mediation Centres Act 1997 s 15 | Singapore |
State Courts Act 1970 (2020 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1999 (2020 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Judicial review
- Magistrate’s Complaint
- Public Prosecutor
- Legal professional privilege
- Criminal Procedure Code
- Illegality
- Irrationality
- Procedural impropriety
15.2 Keywords
- Judicial review
- Attorney-General
- Criminal Procedure Code
- Magistrate's Complaint
- Singapore High Court
16. Subjects
- Administrative Law
- Criminal Procedure
- Judicial Review
17. Areas of Law
- Administrative Law
- Criminal Procedure