Lim Keng Teck v Official Assignee: Review of Monthly & Target Contribution under IRDA
In the matter of Lim Keng Teck, the High Court of Singapore heard an application by Mr. Lim Keng Teck to review the Official Assignee's determination of his monthly contribution (MC) and target contribution (TC) under the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018. The court allowed the application in part, adjusting the MC to $4,004.90 until 2 January 2025, to account for the claimant's existing tenancy agreement. The court emphasized that this adjustment was made to achieve justice and equity, not due to any deficiency in the Official Assignee's determination.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore1.2 Outcome
Application allowed in part
1.3 Case Type
Insolvency
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
The High Court reviewed the Official Assignee's determination of Lim Keng Teck's monthly and target contributions, adjusting the monthly contribution to account for existing rental obligations.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Official Assignee | Respondent | Government Agency | Determination varied | Partial | Christopher Eng Chee Yang of Insolvency & Public Trustee’s Office Lim Yew Jin of Insolvency & Public Trustee’s Office |
Lim Keng Teck | Claimant | Individual | Application allowed in part | Partial |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Goh Yihan | Judge of the High Court | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Christopher Eng Chee Yang | Insolvency & Public Trustee’s Office |
Lim Yew Jin | Insolvency & Public Trustee’s Office |
Sim Puay Jain Edwin | Lexton Law Corporation |
Faith Tan Fen Yi | Lexton Law Corporation |
4. Facts
- Lim Keng Teck was adjudged a bankrupt on 23 February 2023.
- The Official Assignee issued a Second Determination on 18 August 2023, setting Lim Keng Teck's monthly contribution at $7,630 and target contribution at $396,760.
- Lim Keng Teck applied to the court to review the Second Determination.
- Lim Keng Teck is employed as an independent consultant.
- Lim Keng Teck is in a tenancy agreement that cannot be terminated until 2 January 2025 without paying the full 24 months’ rent.
- Lim Keng Teck's spouse earns a monthly income of $2,800.
5. Formal Citations
- Re Lim Keng Teck, Bankruptcy No 206 of 2023 (Summons No 2771 of 2023), [2023] SGHC 287
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Claimant adjudged bankrupt | |
Official Assignee issued First Determination | |
Claimant filed SUM 1686 | |
SUM 1686 allowed, Official Assignee directed to reassess MC and TC | |
Official Assignee issued Second Determination | |
Claimant filed application to review Second Determination | |
Judgment reserved | |
Judgment issued | |
Claimant's tenancy agreement expires | |
Claimant to inform OA of new rental arrangements |
7. Legal Issues
- Review of Official Assignee's Determination of Monthly Contribution and Target Contribution
- Outcome: The court allowed the application in part, adjusting the monthly contribution to account for the claimant's existing rental obligations.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Consideration of bankrupt's income stability
- Consideration of bankrupt's employment nature
- Consideration of bankrupt's tenancy agreement
- Consideration of spouse's contribution to family maintenance
- Power of Court to Vary Monthly Contribution and Target Contribution
- Outcome: The court held that it had the power to vary the monthly contribution and target contribution if it was just and equitable to do so, and ordered a 'step-up MC plan' to account for the claimant's tenancy agreement.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Review of Monthly Contribution
- Review of Target Contribution
9. Cause of Actions
- Review of Official Assignee's Determination
10. Practice Areas
- Bankruptcy
- Insolvency
- Restructuring
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mirmohammadali Hadian v Ambika d/o Ramachandran (Official Assignee, non-party) | High Court | Yes | [2023] SGHC 116 | Singapore | Cited for the two-stage framework for reviewing the Official Assignee's determination of monthly contribution and target contribution under s 340(1) of the IRDA. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution (Personal Insolvency) Rules 2020 |
Rule 121(1) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution (Personal Insolvency) Rules 2020 |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 | Singapore |
Section 340 Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 | Singapore |
Sections 341(1) and 341(2)(c) Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 | Singapore |
Section 339(2) Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 | Singapore |
Section 339(1)(a) Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 | Singapore |
Section 342(1) Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 | Singapore |
Section 342(2)(c) Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Monthly Contribution
- Target Contribution
- Official Assignee
- Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018
- Bankruptcy
- Tenancy Agreement
- Step-up MC plan
15.2 Keywords
- Bankruptcy
- Insolvency
- Monthly Contribution
- Target Contribution
- Official Assignee
- Singapore
- IRDA
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Bankruptcy | 95 |
Insolvency Law | 95 |
Restructuring and Dissolution | 90 |
Civil Procedure | 40 |
Property Law | 30 |
16. Subjects
- Bankruptcy
- Insolvency
- Restructuring
- Civil Procedure