VWM v VWN: Division of HDB Flat in Divorce Proceedings
In the case of VWM v VWN, the Appellate Division of the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal regarding the division of a Housing and Development Board (HDB) flat in divorce proceedings. The wife, VWM, appealed against the decision of the lower court, which had ordered the flat to be returned to the HDB. The Appellate Division allowed the wife's appeal, ordering the husband, VWN, to transfer his interest in the flat to the wife, subject to her reimbursing his contributions to the flat's purchase.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
Appellate Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore1.2 Outcome
Appeal Allowed
1.3 Case Type
Family
1.4 Judgment Type
Ex Tempore Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Appeal regarding the division of a Housing and Development Board (HDB) flat in divorce proceedings. The court allowed the wife's appeal, ordering the husband to transfer his interest in the flat to the wife.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Woo Bih Li | Judge of the Appellate Division | Yes |
Kannan Ramesh | Judge of the Appellate Division | No |
Debbie Ong Siew Ling | Judge of the Appellate Division | No |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Patrick Fernandez | Fernandez LLC |
Mohamed Arshad Mohamed Tahir | Fernandez LLC |
4. Facts
- Parties applied to purchase an HDB flat before divorce proceedings.
- The purchase of the flat was not completed pending the outcome of divorce proceedings.
- The wife sought the transfer of the husband's interest in the flat to her.
- The District Judge declined the wife's request and ordered the flat to be returned to the HDB.
- The wife appealed the District Judge's decision.
- The wife offered to reimburse the husband's CPF contributions towards the flat.
- The husband lives in another HDB flat.
5. Formal Citations
- VWM v VWN, Civil Appeal No 65 of 2022, [2023] SGHC(A) 4
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Parties applied to purchase the flat from the HDB | |
Divorce proceedings commenced | |
District Judge made ancillary orders | |
Wife appealed against the orders of the District Judge | |
Appeal was heard by a judge of the General Division of the High Court | |
Wife applied to the AD for leave to appeal | |
AD granted the wife leave to appeal only in respect of the flat | |
Wife filed her Notice of Appeal | |
Wife obtained valuation from AUG Valuers LLP | |
Husband submitted valuation report by Savills Valuation and Professional Services (S) Pte Ltd | |
Grounds of decision were issued | |
Deadline for parties to tender written submissions in response to the GD | |
Judgment delivered |
7. Legal Issues
- Division of Matrimonial Assets
- Outcome: The court allowed the wife's appeal and ordered the husband to transfer his interest in the flat to the wife, subject to reimbursement of his contributions.
- Category: Substantive
- Whether the HDB flat is a matrimonial asset
- Outcome: The court held that the right to acquire the flat during the marriage is a matrimonial asset even though the purchase had not been completed yet.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Transfer of husband's interest in HDB flat to wife
9. Cause of Actions
- No cause of actions
10. Practice Areas
- Divorce
- Family Law
11. Industries
- Real Estate
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No cited cases |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
s 112(10)(b) Women’s Charter | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Matrimonial asset
- HDB flat
- Division of assets
- Minimum occupation period
- Central Provident Fund
15.2 Keywords
- Divorce
- Matrimonial Assets
- HDB Flat
- Singapore
- Family Law
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Family Law | 95 |
Matrimonial Assets | 95 |
Division of Assets | 90 |
16. Subjects
- Family Law
- Divorce
- Property Law