Silvester Selvan v Hilda Loe: En Bloc Sale Dispute over GSM Building
In Silvester Selvan s/o Jeyaperagasam and others v Hilda Loe Associates Pte Ltd and others, the General Division of the High Court of Singapore heard an application concerning the en bloc sale of the GSM Building to Coliwoo (TK) Pte Ltd. The claimants, members of the collective sale committee, sought a court order for the sale after objections from the defendants, subsidiary proprietors, led to a stop order from the Strata Titles Board. Christopher Tan JC dismissed the defendants' objections and granted the claimants' application, finding no lack of good faith in the transaction.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
General Division of the High Court1.2 Outcome
Application Granted
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
En bloc sale dispute over GSM Building. Court dismissed objections, granting order for sale to Coliwoo, finding no lack of good faith.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Silvester Selvan s/o Jeyaperagasam | Claimant | Individual | Application Granted | Won | |
Hilda Loe Associates Pte Ltd | Defendant | Corporation | Objections Dismissed | Lost | |
Coliwoo (TK) Pte Ltd | Purchaser | Corporation | Sale Approved | Won |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Christopher Tan | Judicial Commissioner | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- The application concerned the en bloc sale of the GSM Building to Coliwoo.
- The claimants were members of the collective sale committee overseeing the sale.
- The defendants represented the subsidiary proprietors objecting to the sale.
- The Strata Titles Board issued a stop order due to unresolved objections.
- The property is a 99-year leasehold commencing on 2 May 1978.
- The property was zoned as “Commercial” under the URA Master Plan 2019.
- The CSC authorised Coliwoo to file an application to URA seeking approval for changing the use of the Property from “Commercial” to “Serviced Apartment”.
5. Formal Citations
- Silvester Selvan s/o Jeyaperagasam and others v Hilda Loe Associates Pte Ltd and others, Originating Application No 1026 of 2023, [2024] SGHC 104
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Lease commenced | |
CSA 1 signed | |
URA issued January 2020 Letter | |
Tender 1 called | |
Tender 1 closed | |
URA sent letter regarding zoning | |
Extraordinary General Meeting held | |
80% approval for CSA 2 obtained | |
Tender 2A opened | |
Tender 2A closed | |
Amberdale refused extension | |
KEAF ended negotiations | |
Private treaty deadline expired | |
January 2023 Application filed | |
Tender 2B opened | |
Tender 2B closed | |
CSC voted to accept Coliwoo's offer | |
URA approved change of use | |
Letter of acceptance sent to Coliwoo's solicitors | |
LHN Limited issued exchange circular | |
Application to STB filed | |
Mediation session held | |
SRE's Valuation Report dated | |
Mediation session held | |
STB issued stop order | |
Application filed in court | |
Summons filed for document production | |
Hearing commenced | |
Hearing concluded | |
Judgment issued |
7. Legal Issues
- Good Faith in Collective Sale
- Outcome: The court found that the collective sale committee had acted in good faith, despite some missteps in the process.
- Category: Substantive
- Related Cases:
- [2018] SGCA 86
- [2019] 2 SLR 46
- [2009] 3 SLR(R) 109
- [2017] 2 SLR 413
- Duty to Obtain Best Price
- Outcome: The court found that the collective sale committee had taken reasonable steps to obtain an appropriate price for the property, even if a better price could theoretically have been obtained.
- Category: Substantive
- Related Cases:
- [2009] 3 SLR(R) 109
- [2017] 2 SLR 413
- Duty to Consult Subsidiary Proprietors
- Outcome: The court found that while there were some instances where the collective sale committee could have been more transparent with the subsidiary proprietors, these did not amount to a lack of good faith.
- Category: Substantive
- Related Cases:
- [2009] 3 SLR(R) 109
8. Remedies Sought
- Court Order for the Sale of Property
9. Cause of Actions
- Application for Court Order for Sale of Property
10. Practice Areas
- Real Estate Law
- Commercial Litigation
11. Industries
- Real Estate
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low Kwang Tong v Karen Teo Mei Ling and others | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2018] SGCA 86 | Singapore | Cited for the approach to assessing good faith in collective sales under s 84A of the Land Titles (Strata) Act. |
Kok Yin Chong and others v Lim Hun Joo and others | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2019] 2 SLR 46 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the burden of proving lack of good faith rests on the objectors to the collective sale. |
Ng Eng Ghee and others v Mamata Kapildev Dave and others (Horizon Partners Pte Ltd, intervener) and another appeal | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2009] 3 SLR(R) 109 | Singapore | Cited for the extensive exposition of the concept of good faith in the collective sale context. |
Ramachandran Jayakumar and others v Woo Hon Wai and others and another matter | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2017] 2 SLR 413 | Singapore | Cited for reaffirming the exposition of good faith in Ng Eng Ghee (Horizon Towers) and explaining that a lack of good faith usually entails some want of probity. |
Lim Hun Joo and others v Kok Yin Chong and others | High Court | No | [2019] SGHC 3 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that valuation should not be based on speculative elements. |
Mrs Spykerman Chwee Wah Christina née Lim v Yow Jia Wen and others | High Court | No | [2023] SGHC 158 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that a valuation should not be based on a speculative estimate of a property’s potential. |
Ngui Gek Lian Philomene and others v Chan Kiat and others (HSR International Realtors Pte Ltd, intervener) | High Court | No | [2013] 4 SLR 694 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that even if a valuation report has shortcomings, it does not necessarily lead to the conclusion that the collective sale committee breached its duty to obtain the best price. |
Sakthivel Punithavathi v Public Prosecutor | Court of Appeal | No | [2007] 2 SLR(R) 983 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the court is not obliged to unquestioningly accept a party’s expert evidence, just because the other side decides not to call an expert of its own. |
Saeng-Un Udom v PP | Court of Appeal | No | [2001] 2 SLR(R) 1 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the court should not reject expert evidence which is unopposed and appears not to be obviously lacking in defensibility. |
Armstrong, Carol Ann (executrix of the estate of Peter Traynor, deceased, and on behalf of the dependents of Peter Traynor, deceased) v Quest Laboratories Pte Ltd and another and other appeals | Court of Appeal | No | [2020] 1 SLR 133 | Singapore | Cited for the principle that the court is not bound to reject an expert’s opinion in its entirety simply because it has rejected some portions. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Land Titles (Strata) Act 1967 | Singapore |
s 84A(2A)(a) of the Land Titles (Strata) Act 1967 | Singapore |
s 84A(6A)(b) of the Land Titles (Strata) Act 1967 | Singapore |
s 84A(2A)(b) of the Land Titles (Strata) Act 1967 | Singapore |
s 84A(9)(a)(i)(A) of the Land Titles (Strata) Act 1967 | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- En Bloc Sale
- Collective Sale
- Subsidiary Proprietors
- Collective Sale Committee
- Good Faith
- Reserve Price
- Strata Titles Board
- URA Master Plan
- Gross Floor Area
- Gross Plot Ratio
15.2 Keywords
- En Bloc
- Collective Sale
- Strata Titles
- Property
- Singapore
- GSM Building
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
En Bloc Sales | 95 |
Strata Titles | 90 |
Property Law | 80 |
Real Estate | 75 |
Contracts | 40 |
Commercial Law | 30 |
16. Subjects
- Real Estate
- Strata Titles
- En Bloc Sales
- Property Law