Fitzgerald v Dulwich College: Anticipatory Breach of Employment Contract Dispute
In the case of Ruth Fitzgerald against Dulwich College (Singapore) Pte Ltd, heard in the General Division of the High Court of Singapore on 20-21 March and 18 April 2024, the court addressed the issue of whether Fitzgerald wrongfully terminated her employment contract. Dulwich College claimed Fitzgerald anticipatorily breached her contract by stating she would not return to Singapore until January 2022. The court dismissed Fitzgerald's claim, finding that she had communicated her intention to delay her return, justifying the termination.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore1.2 Outcome
Claim Dismissed
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Ruth Fitzgerald sued Dulwich College for wrongful termination. The court found Fitzgerald anticipatorily breached her contract by indicating she wouldn't return to Singapore on time.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ruth Fitzgerald | Claimant | Individual | Claim Dismissed | Lost | |
Dulwich College (Singapore) Pte Ltd | Defendant | Corporation | Judgment for Defendant | Won |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Choo Han Teck | Judge of the High Court | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- Claimant was employed as a school counsellor under a 3-year fixed term contract.
- Claimant's contract was terminated on 5 August 2021.
- Claimant left Singapore on 28 June 2021 for Ireland for the summer vacation.
- Claimant received an email on 5 August 2021 notifying her of termination.
- Defendant alleged claimant stated she would not return to Singapore until January 2022.
- School term was scheduled to recommence on 18 August 2021.
- Claimant's husband required medical treatment in Ireland.
5. Formal Citations
- Fitzgerald, Ruth v Dulwich College (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Originating Claim No 314 of 2022, [2024] SGHC 114
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Claimant's 3-year fixed term employment contract commenced | |
School headmaster's letter stated all staff required to be at College on the first day back of the new academic year in August | |
Claimant indicated intent to travel overseas | |
HR informed claimant she has to provide her full travel itinerary | |
Claimant responded to HR email | |
HR sent email to claimant informing her of updates to the travel restrictions | |
HR asked claimant to update her on her travel plans | |
Claimant responded she was intending to travel to Ireland | |
HR asked for claimant’s flight itinerary and planned return date | |
Claimant responded to HR email | |
Claimant and her family left for Ireland | |
Line manager asked claimant if there was any news on returning to Singapore | |
Claimant informed line manager they were expecting to have her husband’s final results over the coming days | |
Claimant confirmed she had a clearer picture of her husband’s situation | |
Claimant and line manager scheduled a video call | |
Claimant and line manager had a WhatsApp call | |
Claimant received the emailed letter of termination | |
Line manager reached out to the claimant on WhatsApp | |
Defendant’s school term was scheduled to recommence | |
Claimant instructed her solicitors to write to the defendant | |
Ransomware attack on the Health Service Executive of Ireland | |
Trial began | |
Trial | |
Trial | |
Judgment reserved |
7. Legal Issues
- Anticipatory Breach of Contract
- Outcome: The court found that the claimant's statement that she would not return until January 2022 constituted an anticipatory breach of her employment contract.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Deprivation of benefit of contract
- Inability to perform duties
- Wrongful Termination
- Outcome: The court held that the termination was justified due to the claimant's anticipatory breach.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Compensation for wrongful termination
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Contract
- Wrongful Termination
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
- Employment Dispute
11. Industries
- Education
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No cited cases |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Anticipatory breach
- Wrongful termination
- Employment contract
- Fixed term contract
- School counsellor
- International school
15.2 Keywords
- Employment
- Contract
- Termination
- Breach
- Singapore
- School
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Employment Law | 95 |
Anticipatory Breach | 90 |
Termination | 90 |
Breach of Contract | 90 |
Wrongful Termination | 85 |
Evidence Law | 60 |
Commercial Disputes | 30 |
Estoppel | 20 |
16. Subjects
- Contract Law
- Employment Law
- Anticipatory Breach