Suresh s/o Purushothaman v Kusula Kumari d/o A Kesavan: HDB Flat Ownership Dispute

In the case of Suresh s/o Purushothaman v Kusula Kumari d/o A Kesavan, the General Division of the High Court of Singapore heard an originating application regarding a dispute over the ownership of a Housing Development Board (HDB) flat. The claimant, Suresh s/o Purushothaman, sought to compel the defendant, Kusula Kumari d/o A Kesavan, to transfer her share of the flat to him. Choo Han Teck J ordered that the originating application be converted into an originating claim, citing factual disputes that require resolution through a trial.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court

1.2 Outcome

Originating application converted into an originating claim.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Dispute over ownership of a Housing Development Board (HDB) flat between Suresh s/o Purushothaman and Kusula Kumari d/o A Kesavan. The court ordered the originating application to be converted into an originating claim.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Suresh s/o PurushothamanClaimantIndividualOriginating application converted into an originating claimNeutral
Kusula Kumari d/o A KesavanDefendantIndividualOriginating application converted into an originating claimNeutral

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudge of the High CourtYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Darryl Ho Jun HanR. S. Solomon LLC

4. Facts

  1. Claimant and defendant purchased a HDB flat as joint tenants.
  2. Claimant has had no stable employment since 2013.
  3. Defendant works as an optical assistant in the UK.
  4. Defendant left Singapore in early 2018 and resided in the UK.
  5. Defendant was adjudicated a bankrupt on 3 May 2018.
  6. Defendant withdrew her consent to the transfer application.
  7. Claimant alleges defendant's lawyers informed him that defendant had severed the ownership in the Flat into a tenancy in common.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Suresh s/o Purushothaman v Kusula Kumari d/o A Kesavan, Originating Application No 201 of 2024, [2024] SGHC 269

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Claimant and defendant met.
Claimant and defendant purchased HDB flat as joint tenants.
Defendant adjudicated bankrupt.
Defendant left Singapore and resided in the UK.
Defendant's lawyers informed claimant that defendant had severed ownership in the flat into a tenancy in common.
Parties signed an Application for Change in HDB Flat Ownership form.
HDB informed claimant that defendant had withdrawn her consent to the transfer application.
HDB informed claimant that defendant's lawyers did not have approval from the defendant's Official Assignee for her to transfer her share of the Flat.
Judgment reserved
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. HDB Flat Ownership Dispute
    • Outcome: The court ordered the originating application to be converted into an originating claim for further determination of the factual disputes.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Order to compel the defendant to transfer her share of the flat to the claimant.

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
O 15 r 7(6)(c) of the Rules of Court 2021

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Section 18(2) of the Supreme Court of Judicature ActSingapore
Section 2 of the First Schedule of the Supreme Court of Judicature ActSingapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Housing Development Board
  • HDB flat
  • Joint tenants
  • Tenancy in common
  • Originating application
  • Originating claim
  • Bankruptcy

15.2 Keywords

  • HDB
  • flat
  • ownership
  • dispute
  • Singapore
  • court

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Property
  • Civil Procedure