COSCO Shipping v PT OKI Pulp: Jurisdiction to Stay Execution of Court of Appeal Order

In COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers Co, Ltd v PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills and others, the High Court of Singapore addressed the issue of whether the General Division of the High Court has jurisdiction to grant an interim stay of execution of an anti-suit injunction granted by the Court of Appeal. The application was made by PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills. The High Court held that it did have jurisdiction and granted the interim stay subject to conditions.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court

1.2 Outcome

Interim stay of execution granted to the applicant, PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills, subject to conditions.

1.3 Case Type

Admiralty

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The High Court addresses whether it has jurisdiction to stay execution of a Court of Appeal's anti-suit injunction, ruling it does.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers Co, LtdClaimant, RespondentCorporationApplication for interim stay grantedLostToh Kian Sing SC, Dedi Affandi bin Ahmad, Hazel Cheah Kam Ying, Wu Muyu
PT OKI Pulp & Paper MillsDefendant, ApplicantCorporationInterim stay of execution grantedWonAbraham S Vergis SC, Ngo Wei Shing, Axl Rizqy, Leong Lu Yuan, Chan Wai Yi Kevin, Dawn Tan Si Jie, Teo Wei Lin Elizabeth
COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers (Europe) BVDefendantCorporationNeutralNeutral
All other persons claiming or being entitled to claim damage, loss, expense, indemnity arising out of contact between “LE LI” (IMO No 9192674) and jetty/structure at Tanjung Tapa Pier on or about 31.05.2022DefendantOtherNeutralNeutral

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
S MohanJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Toh Kian Sing SCRajah & Tann Singapore LLP
Dedi Affandi bin AhmadRajah & Tann Singapore LLP
Hazel Cheah Kam YingRajah & Tann Singapore LLP
Wu MuyuRajah & Tann Singapore LLP
Abraham S Vergis SCProvidence Law Asia LLC
Ngo Wei ShingProvidence Law Asia LLC
Axl RizqyProvidence Law Asia LLC
Leong Lu YuanClasis LLC
Chan Wai Yi KevinClasis LLC
Dawn Tan Si JieClasis LLC
Teo Wei Lin ElizabethClasis LLC

4. Facts

  1. COSCO Shipping owned the vessel “LE LI”.
  2. The vessel made contact with a trestle bridge connecting a jetty in Indonesia.
  3. OKI claims to be the owner and operator of the jetty.
  4. The incident occurred on 31 May 2022.
  5. OKI commenced proceedings in Indonesia seeking losses from the incident.
  6. COSCO Shipping commenced an action in Singapore to limit its liability.
  7. COSCO Shipping applied for an anti-suit injunction to restrain OKI from pursuing the Indonesian Proceedings.

5. Formal Citations

  1. COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers Co, LtdvPT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills and others, Admiralty in Personam No 50 of 2022 (Summons No 2712 of 2024), [2024] SGHC 273

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Incident occurred between vessel “LE LI” and jetty/structure at Tanjung Tapa Pier.
COSCO Shipping commenced action HC/ADM 50/2022 to limit its liability.
PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills commenced proceedings in Indonesia.
COSCO Shipping applied for an anti-suit injunction via HC/SUM 2676/2023.
COSCO Shipping was granted permission to appeal by the Court of Appeal in CA/OA 7/2024.
Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in CA/CA 29/2024 and granted an anti-suit injunction against OKI by CA/ORC 34/2024.
OKI seeks to stay the execution of ORC 34 in HC/SUM 2712/2024.
High Court heard arguments regarding the interim stay application.
High Court issued grounds of decision granting the interim stay.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Jurisdiction to Stay Execution
    • Outcome: The General Division of the High Court has jurisdiction to grant an interim stay of execution of an order made by the Court of Appeal.
    • Category: Jurisdictional
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Original civil jurisdiction
      • Appellate jurisdiction
      • Incidental appellate jurisdiction
    • Related Cases:
      • [2024] SGHC 92
      • [2021] 1 SLR 809
      • [2022] 2 SLR 340
      • [2014] 3 SLR 357

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Stay of execution of anti-suit injunction

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Admiralty Litigation
  • Civil Litigation

11. Industries

  • Shipping
  • Pulp and Paper

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers Co, Ltd v PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills and othersGeneral Division of the High CourtYes[2024] SGHC 92SingaporeCited for background facts and the earlier decision declining COSCO Shipping's application for an anti-suit injunction against OKI.
Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin v Attorney-GeneralCourt of AppealYes[2021] 1 SLR 809SingaporeCited regarding the doctrine of stare decisis and the power of the High Court to stay the execution of a death sentence affirmed by the Court of Appeal.
Pradeepto Kumar Biswas v Sabyasachi Mukherjee and another and another matterCourt of AppealYes[2022] 2 SLR 340SingaporeCited for the principle that the Court of Appeal has no original civil jurisdiction and only exercises appellate or incidental appellate jurisdiction.
Re Nalpon Zero Geraldo MarioCourt of AppealYes[2013] 3 SLR 258SingaporeCited for the principle that Singapore courts are creatures of statute and their jurisdiction must be statutorily conferred.
Lee Wee Ching v Wang PiaoCourt of AppealYes[2024] 1 SLR 350SingaporeCited for the principle that the jurisdiction of a court must be statutorily conferred upon that court by the statute constituting it.
Au Wai Pang v Attorney-General and another matterCourt of AppealYes[2014] 3 SLR 357SingaporeCited for the principle that the Court of Appeal only exercises appellate civil jurisdiction and for the concept of incidental appellate jurisdiction.
Naseer Ahmad Akhtar v Suresh Agarwal and anotherHigh CourtYes[2015] 5 SLR 1032SingaporeCited for the Court of Appeal possessing all the jurisdiction and powers of the puisne court to determine matters which are incidental to the hearing and determination of an appeal.
Denko-HLB Sdn Bhd v Fagerdala Singapore Pte LtdCourt of AppealYes[2002] 2 SLR(R) 336SingaporeCited for the principle that the Court of Appeal only has the powers of the High Court where there is an appeal in existence.
Ocean Software Ltd v Kay and othersQueen's BenchYes[1992] 1 QB 583England and WalesCited for the principle that a subsequent inter partes application for an injunction to be discharged does not have to be heard at the first and last instance by the Court of Appeal.
Mah Kah Yew v Public ProsecutorCourt of Criminal AppealYesMah Kah Yew v Public Prosecutor [1968–1970] SLR(R) 851SingaporeCited for the definition of stare decisis.
Goh Nellie v Goh Lian Teck and othersCourt of AppealYesGoh Nellie v Goh Lian Teck and others [2007] 1 SLR(R) 453SingaporeCited for the doctrine of res judicata.
Kho Jabing v Attorney-GeneralCourt of AppealYesKho Jabing v Attorney-General [2016] 3 SLR 1273SingaporeCited for the principle that the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain a civil application even if it is inferior in the judicial hierarchy to the Court of Appeal.
Cropper v SmithEnglish Court of AppealYes(1883) 24 Ch D 305England and WalesCited for the principle that where an application may be made either to the Court of Appeal or to another court, it must first be made to the other court.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
Rules of Court 2021

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Merchant Shipping Act 1995N/A
Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1969Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Jurisdiction
  • Stay of execution
  • Anti-suit injunction
  • Original civil jurisdiction
  • Appellate jurisdiction
  • Incidental appellate jurisdiction
  • Stare decisis
  • Res judicata

15.2 Keywords

  • Jurisdiction
  • Stay of execution
  • Anti-suit injunction
  • Court of Appeal
  • High Court
  • Singapore

16. Subjects

  • Civil Procedure
  • Jurisdiction
  • Admiralty

17. Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure
  • Jurisdiction
  • Admiralty Law
  • Injunctions