WZK v WZJ: Will Revocation Dispute - Validity of December Will Challenged
In the Family Justice Courts of Singapore, Choo Han Teck J heard cross-appeals (DCA 43/2024 and DCA 46/2024) regarding the validity of two wills of the deceased. The first Defendant, WZK, appealed against the trial judge's decision to uphold the May 2017 will, while the Plaintiff, WZJ, appealed against the decision not to remove WZK as the executor. The court dismissed both appeals, finding insufficient evidence to support the validity of the December 2017 will and affirming the trial judge's decision to allow WZK to remain as executor, subject to faithful discharge of her duties.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
General Division of the High Court (Family Division)1.2 Outcome
Appeals dismissed.
1.3 Case Type
Family
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Cross-appeals concerning the validity of a will. The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the earlier will due to doubts surrounding the later will's execution.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Choo Han Teck | Judge of the High Court | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- The Deceased executed a will on 30 May 2017 (May Will) leaving his estate to his three children.
- The Deceased purportedly executed another will on 28 December 2017 (December Will) leaving his estate to his grandchildren.
- The first Defendant is the executrix and trustee under the May Will.
- The second Defendant is the executrix and trustee under the December Will.
- The circumstances surrounding the execution of the December Will were disputed.
- The trial judge disbelieved the second Defendant's testimony regarding the December Will.
- The Plaintiff's expert testified that the signature on the December Will was not that of the Deceased.
5. Formal Citations
- WZK and another v WZJ and another, , [2024] SGHCF 39
- WZK, District Court Appeal No 43 of 2024, District Court Appeal No 43 of 2024
- WZJ, District Court Appeal No 46 of 2024, District Court Appeal No 46 of 2024
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Prior will executed | |
May Will executed | |
Deceased moved to stay with the first Defendant after a heart attack | |
December Will purportedly executed | |
Deceased moved to Johor, Malaysia | |
Deceased died | |
Lawyer met with Plaintiff and his mother | |
Lawyer met with the first Defendant | |
Judgment reserved | |
Judgment delivered |
7. Legal Issues
- Revocation of Will
- Outcome: The court found insufficient evidence to prove the validity of the December Will, thus the May Will was not revoked.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Validity of subsequent will
- Proper attestation and execution of will
- Testator's sound mind at time of execution
- Executor Removal
- Outcome: The court declined to remove the first Defendant as executor, finding that the assets of the estate were clearly identified and she was on notice to discharge her duties faithfully.
- Category: Procedural
8. Remedies Sought
- Declaration of Validity of Will
- Revocation of Probate
- Removal of Executor
9. Cause of Actions
- Probate Dispute
- Will Contest
10. Practice Areas
- Probate
- Estate Administration
- Family Litigation
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No cited cases |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Will
- Revocation
- Executor
- Beneficiary
- Attestation
- Sound mind
- Signature
- Thumbprint
- Probate
- Trustee
15.2 Keywords
- Will
- Revocation
- Probate
- Family Dispute
- Singapore
- Succession
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Wills and Probate | 95 |
Estate Administration | 90 |
Revocation of Will | 80 |
Will Execution | 70 |
Evidence Law | 60 |
16. Subjects
- Wills and Probate
- Family Disputes