Arthur Loke Bernard Rada & Lee

Arthur Loke Bernard Rada & Lee is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2003. The firm has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and employment law. Their track record shows a 30.8% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 15.4% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Arthur Loke Bernard Rada & Lee has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and employment law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	4 cases	19.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82.22% relevance score	Arthur Loke Bernard Rada & Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 19.0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	9.5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82.50% relevance score	Arthur Loke Bernard Rada & Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9.5% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	4.8% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	Arthur Loke Bernard Rada & Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.8% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4.8% of total caseload	Experienced50.00% relevance score	Arthur Loke Bernard Rada & Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4.8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	Arthur Loke Bernard Rada & Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	4.8% of total caseload	General Practice40.00% relevance score	Arthur Loke Bernard Rada & Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.8% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	4.8% of total caseload	General Practice10.00% relevance score	Arthur Loke Bernard Rada & Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.8% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	4.8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95.00% relevance score	Arthur Loke Bernard Rada & Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.8% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4.8% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Arthur Loke Bernard Rada & Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4.8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	Arthur Loke Bernard Rada & Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.8% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Arthur Loke Bernard Rada & Lee has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 4 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
G B Vasu	4 cases	30.8% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 271(Sep 2001) 2001 sghc 208(Jul 2001) 2001 sghc 200(Jul 2001)
Benjamin Goh	3 cases	23.1% of firm's cases	2002 sgca 43(Oct 2002) 2002 sgca 38(Aug 2002) 2002 sghc 19(Jan 2002)
Stephen Soh	2 cases	15.4% of firm's cases	2002 sghc 32(Feb 2002) 2001 sghc 5(Jan 2001)
Paul Fitzgerald	1 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 54(Mar 2001)
Kenneth Tan	1 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2002 sgca 43(Oct 2002)
Christopher Stephen Soh	1 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2003 sgca 7(Feb 2003)
Stephen Christopher Soh	1 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2002 sghc 185(Aug 2002)
Wong Chiao Shan	1 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2002 sghc 185(Aug 2002)
Adeline James	1 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2002 sghc 32(Feb 2002)
Adelia Maler James	1 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2003 sghc 226(Sep 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Arthur Loke Bernard Rada & Lee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.9
Complex Cases: 2 (15.4%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	72.5 parties avg	2.5	53.8%
Won	43.5 parties avg	3.5	30.8%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	15.4%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	62.6 parties avg	2.6
2002	53.1 parties avg	3.1
2003	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Arthur Loke Bernard Rada & Lee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(53.8%)	53.8%
Won	4(30.8%)	30.8%
Partial	2(15.4%)	15.4%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	11111400	1111140.005 cases	5
USD	551316.99	275658.502 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	0222 222	Lost: 2 cases (0.9%) Partial: 2 cases (0.9%) Won: 2 cases (0.9%)
2002	041 41	Lost: 4 cases (9.8%) Won: 1 cases (2.4%)
2003	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Arthur Loke Bernard Rada & Lee in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
United Artists Singapore Theatres Pte LtdRespondent, Plaintiff, Defendant Won (2)Partial (1)	Respondent, Plaintiff, Defendant	3 cases	Won (2)Partial (1)
Pacific Media PLCRespondent, Plaintiff Won (2)	Respondent, Plaintiff	2 cases	Won (2)
Nippon SP Tech (S) Pte LtdDefendant Won (2)	Defendant	2 cases	Won (2)
Goh Han HengAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Ooi Ching LingAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Ooi Ching Ling ShirleyAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Jupiter Air LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Jupiter Singapore Pte LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Shirley Ooi Ching LingDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Measurex Corporation BhdDefendant, Respondent Partial (1)	Defendant, Respondent	1 case	Partial (1)
Tan Eng Koon trading as De AngeliDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Measurex Corporation BerhadDefendant, Appellant Lost (1)	Defendant, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)