Bogaars and Din

Bogaars and Din is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2005. The firm has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 5 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in negligence. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Bogaars and Din has demonstrated expertise across 4 primary practice areas, with significant experience in automobile accidents and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Automobile Accidents	4 cases	40.0% of total caseload	Experienced74.58% relevance score	Bogaars and Din has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 40.0% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	4 cases	40.0% of total caseload	Experienced67.92% relevance score	Bogaars and Din has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 40.0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	10.0% of total caseload	General Practice40.00% relevance score	Bogaars and Din has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10.0% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	10.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80.00% relevance score	Bogaars and Din has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Bogaars and Din has 5 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 2 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wee Jee Kin	2 cases	50.0% of firm's cases	2004 sghc 268(Nov 2004) 2004 sghc 147(Jul 2004)
Savliwala Din	1 cases	25.0% of firm's cases	2004 sghc 22(Feb 2004)
Adrian Heng	1 cases	25.0% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 180(Sep 2005)
S Sundaram	1 cases	25.0% of firm's cases	2004 sghc 268(Nov 2004)
Gerald Martin Wee	1 cases	25.0% of firm's cases	2004 sghc 22(Feb 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Bogaars and Din's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.7 parties avg	4.7	50.0%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25.0%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	34.4 parties avg	4.4
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Bogaars and Din's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50.0%)	50.0%
Partial	1(25.0%)	25.0%
Won	1(25.0%)	25.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	366850.73	33350.073 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	021 21	Lost: 2 cases (9.5%) Partial: 1 cases (4.8%)
2005	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Bogaars and Din in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Ng Ah TeeDefendant Won (1)Partial (1)	Defendant	2 cases	Won (1)Partial (1)
Teo Cheng HoeDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
A N S Plumbing and Sanitary Pte LtdAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Chew Kiat KeongAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Lo Lee LenAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Yim Khee MengAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)