Bogaars & Din

Bogaars & Din is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2018. The firm has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury. Their track record shows a 23.1% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 23.1% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Bogaars & Din has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in personal injury and automobile accidents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Personal Injury	6 cases	14.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76.67% relevance score	Bogaars & Din has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 14.0% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	5 cases	11.6% of total caseload	Experienced74.00% relevance score	Bogaars & Din has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 11.6% of their total caseload.
Negligence	4 cases	9.3% of total caseload	Experienced68.75% relevance score	Bogaars & Din has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9.3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4.7% of total caseload	Experienced70.00% relevance score	Bogaars & Din has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.7% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	4.7% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	Bogaars & Din has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.7% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	2 cases	4.7% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Bogaars & Din has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	4.7% of total caseload	Experienced52.50% relevance score	Bogaars & Din has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.7% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	4.7% of total caseload	General Practice47.50% relevance score	Bogaars & Din has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.7% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	2 cases	4.7% of total caseload	Experienced56.67% relevance score	Bogaars & Din has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.7% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	2 cases	4.7% of total caseload	General Practice43.33% relevance score	Bogaars & Din has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.7% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Bogaars & Din has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 4 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Savliwala Fakhruddin Huseni	4 cases	30.8% of firm's cases	2015 sgca 38(Aug 2015) 2014 sghc 109(Jun 2014) 2013 sghcr 13(May 2013)
Savliwala Din	2 cases	15.4% of firm's cases	2018 sghc 182(Aug 2018) 2003 sghc 163(Jul 2003)
Subramaniam Sundaram	2 cases	15.4% of firm's cases	2014 sghc 109(Jun 2014) 2013 sghcr 13(May 2013)
Cecilia Lee Thomas	2 cases	15.4% of firm's cases	2015 sgca 38(Aug 2015) 2015 sghc 127(May 2015)
Gerald Martin Wee	2 cases	15.4% of firm's cases	2003 sghc 163(Jul 2003) 2002 sghc 107(May 2002)
Nigel Bogaars	2 cases	15.4% of firm's cases	2018 sghc 182(Aug 2018) 2011 sghc 72(Mar 2011)
Wee Jee Kin	1 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2004 sghc 53(Mar 2004)
Dara Singh	1 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 288(Sep 2001)
Cecilia Hendrick	1 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2015 sghc 11(Jan 2015)
Bogaars Nigel Brian	1 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2015 sghc 60(Mar 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Bogaars & Din's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 3 (23.1%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	62.5 parties avg	2.5	46.2%
Partial	33.3 parties avg	3.3	23.1%
Won	32.6 parties avg	2.6	23.1%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	7.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	43.3 parties avg	3.3
2018	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Bogaars & Din's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(46.2%)	46.2%
Partial	3(23.1%)	23.1%
Won	3(23.1%)	23.1%
Neutral	1(7.7%)	7.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	538851.65	31697.169 cases	9

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	01111 1111	Lost: 1 cases (0.1%) Neutral: 1 cases (0.1%) Partial: 1 cases (0.1%) Won: 1 cases (0.1%)
2018	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Bogaars & Din in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Joo Yong Co (Pte) LtdAppellant, Defendant, Defendant Partial (1)Lost (1)	Appellant, Defendant, Defendant	2 cases	Partial (1)Lost (1)
Chia Soo Ong HectorDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
AnotherDefendant, Respondent Won (1)	Defendant, Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
Karuppiah Jai SankarDefendant, Respondent Won (1)	Defendant, Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
Koh Kow Tee MichaelPlaintiff, Respondent Neutral (1)	Plaintiff, Respondent	1 case	Neutral (1)
Mohd Paqmi bin ArifinDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Hotel Royal @ Queens Pte Ltd trading as Hotel Royal @ QueensPlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
Tiong Hwa Steel Sructures Pte LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Leow Fa Dong (by his next friend Leow Chye Huat)Respondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Lonpac Insurance BhdDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Polar Arts of Asia Pte LtdPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
Cain Sales & Consultancy Pte LtdPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Wong Siu FaiDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Irene Debora SariuliDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Mindo Lumban GaolDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)